nebben
11-17-2008, 01:29 PM
I'm still in the planning phase, so please bear with me here.
Right now in our 1946 house, we've got 100 amp electrical service that goes over an aerial. Since we want to build a non-attached garage, we will be increasing the electrical demands beyond what the house panel can provide. I plan to talk with a city inspector and get a local electrician onboard, but just for general planning purposes I'm prodding your brains.
Given: I want our service from the utility to be upgraded to 200amp. I want to move all wires underground.
Option #1: run new 200amp service from utility to the house. Because the existing panel is 100amp, it would need to be replaced with a 200 amp unit and all breakers reinstalled (or replaced?). Panel will be wired to 100 amp feed that goes to the garage subpanel.
Option #2: run new 200 amp service to garage (which will be all new construction and a new panel or subpanel anyway). Panel will be wired to 100 amp feed that goes to the existing 100 amp house panel. In effect, the house's panel which currently has the 100amp utility service entrace would turn into a subpanel.
So given these two options, with all other things being equal, I prefer the second option for several reasons. I wouldn't need to replace the house's panel and it would require less materials since the garage would be located between the utility pole and the house. Additionally, the current panel is mounted in an exterior wall with intricate stonework around it- I don't want to mess with that if I can help it! For option 1, if I'll be changing the current house panel from 100 to 200 amp, would I need to bring up existing wiring in the house to current code at the same time, or would this largely just be a simple replacement of the panel? For option 2, by changing the house from a main to a subpanel, would I need to bring up existing house wiring up to current codes too...or add additional grounds and such?
Thanks fellas!
Right now in our 1946 house, we've got 100 amp electrical service that goes over an aerial. Since we want to build a non-attached garage, we will be increasing the electrical demands beyond what the house panel can provide. I plan to talk with a city inspector and get a local electrician onboard, but just for general planning purposes I'm prodding your brains.
Given: I want our service from the utility to be upgraded to 200amp. I want to move all wires underground.
Option #1: run new 200amp service from utility to the house. Because the existing panel is 100amp, it would need to be replaced with a 200 amp unit and all breakers reinstalled (or replaced?). Panel will be wired to 100 amp feed that goes to the garage subpanel.
Option #2: run new 200 amp service to garage (which will be all new construction and a new panel or subpanel anyway). Panel will be wired to 100 amp feed that goes to the existing 100 amp house panel. In effect, the house's panel which currently has the 100amp utility service entrace would turn into a subpanel.
So given these two options, with all other things being equal, I prefer the second option for several reasons. I wouldn't need to replace the house's panel and it would require less materials since the garage would be located between the utility pole and the house. Additionally, the current panel is mounted in an exterior wall with intricate stonework around it- I don't want to mess with that if I can help it! For option 1, if I'll be changing the current house panel from 100 to 200 amp, would I need to bring up existing wiring in the house to current code at the same time, or would this largely just be a simple replacement of the panel? For option 2, by changing the house from a main to a subpanel, would I need to bring up existing house wiring up to current codes too...or add additional grounds and such?
Thanks fellas!