OP
zmotorsports
ALLIANCE MEMBER
Continuing on.
I reached for my larger machinist square.

Measured side to side and found there was quite a variance.


I then laid the square across the transmission mounting surface and noted a .030" difference from side to side.


To confirm my rough measurements I grabbed my Starrett test indicator and set up in the quill.


After confirming my gut feeling about the surfaces not being parallel I made another call to the owner. I was given the go ahead to proceed being this far in.
I explained that I felt this was the reason he was continuing to have issues with cracks on this particular bell housing. With the bell housing being mated to the back of the engine it would mean that when the transmission was bolted up to the bell housing two things would happen. First that without the two machined surfaces being parallel that the transmission would be trying to pull that area up to meet it and pull the transmission down towards the low spot resulting in some extreme forces on the cast aluminum bell housing. It would also mean that it was unlikely that the transmission input shaft was parallel with the engine crankshaft and this could create some undue forces with the clutch assembly as well.
I had to turn the bell housing on the mill table to ensure I could reach across the entire surface with the flycutter, I then raised the table to touch off and zero'd the DRO on the highest point of the transmission mating surface.


I marked for reference the low area of the transmission mating surface.

Stay tuned for more.
I reached for my larger machinist square.

Measured side to side and found there was quite a variance.


I then laid the square across the transmission mounting surface and noted a .030" difference from side to side.


To confirm my rough measurements I grabbed my Starrett test indicator and set up in the quill.


After confirming my gut feeling about the surfaces not being parallel I made another call to the owner. I was given the go ahead to proceed being this far in.
I explained that I felt this was the reason he was continuing to have issues with cracks on this particular bell housing. With the bell housing being mated to the back of the engine it would mean that when the transmission was bolted up to the bell housing two things would happen. First that without the two machined surfaces being parallel that the transmission would be trying to pull that area up to meet it and pull the transmission down towards the low spot resulting in some extreme forces on the cast aluminum bell housing. It would also mean that it was unlikely that the transmission input shaft was parallel with the engine crankshaft and this could create some undue forces with the clutch assembly as well.
I had to turn the bell housing on the mill table to ensure I could reach across the entire surface with the flycutter, I then raised the table to touch off and zero'd the DRO on the highest point of the transmission mating surface.


I marked for reference the low area of the transmission mating surface.

Stay tuned for more.
Last edited:


































