To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Post up your vintage Champion deArment/Channellock tools

To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

scoob511

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2021
Messages
13
I’m a newbie with this stuff, but figured I’d share. I picked this 18” Stillson today at the Habitat ReStore and found this thread while researching it. Lots of cool stuff here! AA seems to indicate this is a number 34. The screw nut doesn’t want to go all the way to release the top jaw, so I’ll have to mess around with it a bit more before I can clean it up and post better pics. If there’s a trick to it, though, please let me know!

IMG_0867.jpegIMG_0869.jpeg
IMG_0866.jpeg
 
OP
D

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,549
Location
Northern California
Normally the dynamic jaw can be removed easily. I suspect that the threads on the end of the jaw may have been damaged or deformed. You should check it and possibly dress up any visible problem with a file so it can come apart for cleaning. IMG_4257.png
That is a nice one with the early anvil marking. Those aren’t all that common.
-Don
 

scoob511

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2021
Messages
13
Normally the dynamic jaw can be removed easily. I suspect that the threads on the end of the jaw may have been damaged or deformed. You should check it and possibly dress up any visible problem with a file so it can come apart for cleaning. IMG_4257.png
That is a nice one with the early anvil marking. Those aren’t all that common.
-Don
Neat, thanks for the tip!

Edit—the bottom threads on mine are indeed a bit messy. Thank you for the comparison pic. I’ll use a file to try to open up the damaged thread enough to free it.
 

MisterEd

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2019
Messages
739
Location
Florida
Channellock HEATSORB CLAMP, 46
Weight: 5/8 Ounce
“A specially designed ‘heat sink’ that prevents heat damage to electronic components during soldering. Also a handy, self-gripping ‘third hand’ that holds and retrieves small parts in close work.”

Appears in “Tools by Channellock: Catalogs No. 68 and No. 73C”
 

Attachments

  • 46-19.jpg
    46-19.jpg
    680.2 KB · Views: 15
  • 46-16.jpg
    46-16.jpg
    675.4 KB · Views: 15
  • 46-07.jpg
    46-07.jpg
    743.8 KB · Views: 12
  • 46-04.jpg
    46-04.jpg
    850.9 KB · Views: 13
  • 46-01.jpg
    46-01.jpg
    888.9 KB · Views: 12

B Halverson

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2024
Messages
304
My father was a small dealer of Channellock brand tools 50-some years ago and had a blue peg-board in the back of his work van with the selection of pliers etc. hanging on it which he sold to fellow construction electricians while working on jobs. Electricians always had a few pairs each of the Channellock pliers and their sidecutters were very popular too. We lived close to the Meadville plant and both my father and I talked to the DeArment family members. My father would go to the plant and drop off broken tools customers gave him and they would give him the new ones. The blue pegboard is still hanging in the garage although the former channellock dealer has passed away recently. I will take a look at the pegboard and try to get a photo of it.
 
OP
D

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,549
Location
Northern California
I found these #430 Channellocks at yesterday’s estate sale. I thought that they might be early but they had the 1953 Canadian patent marking. I checked Champion de Arment and Channellock catalogs on the Archive and the first year I could find the #430s listed was 1967. They are only 1/2” longer than #420s and I’m not sure why they bothered. IMG_0138.jpegIMG_0139.jpegIMG_0140.jpeg
IMG_7017.jpeg-Don
 
OP
D

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,549
Location
Northern California
One of the items in a large tool trade with Fred Knox was this 3lb Champion deArment marked ball pein hammer head. There wasn’t much left of the handle so I drilled it until it came loose. IMG_0334.jpeg
Ready for a new handle IMG_0361.jpegIMG_0362.jpegIMG_0363.jpeg
I went through the box of handles and found one that isn’t a bad starting pointIMG_0364.jpegIMG_0365.jpegIMG_0366.jpegIMG_0367.jpeg
Next will be sanding and installation when I can spare the time

IMG_0369.jpeg
When it’s complete it will join the other Channellock and Champion deArment marked hammers. IMG_5112.jpeg
-Don
 
Last edited:

Eric Brown

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2024
Messages
678
Here are my two Champion Dearment No 307 battery pliers. Design patent 94156 (Dec 25, 1934), these have the early pattern on the handles. These two are almost identical. Exceptions being the name stamp on the top pair is not as deep and is closer to the pivot. Another stamping is on the inside of the handles towards the end. The top on is stamped A40 and the bottom one B42.
 

Attachments

  • Champion Battery 6.jpg
    Champion Battery 6.jpg
    52.5 KB · Views: 12
  • Champion Battery 5.jpg
    Champion Battery 5.jpg
    79.5 KB · Views: 10
  • Champion Battery 4.jpg
    Champion Battery 4.jpg
    115.4 KB · Views: 11
  • Champion Battery 3.jpg
    Champion Battery 3.jpg
    169.3 KB · Views: 11
  • Champion Battery 2.jpg
    Champion Battery 2.jpg
    247.2 KB · Views: 10
  • Champion Battery 1.jpg
    Champion Battery 1.jpg
    245.8 KB · Views: 19
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

AntiqueBen

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Messages
1,438
I generally can't pass up Channellocks & Vice Grips (locking pliers) when I run into them. Here is a few of my early Channellocks. One is stamped patent applied for & the other two have a couple different versions of the 1933 stamping.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250422_185259892~2.jpg
    IMG_20250422_185259892~2.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 10
  • IMG_20250422_185359321.jpg
    IMG_20250422_185359321.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 8
  • IMG_20250422_185434226~2.jpg
    IMG_20250422_185434226~2.jpg
    797 KB · Views: 14

AntiqueBen

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Messages
1,438
Same here, I have a couple of 460's, plus A similar pair with red grips. 480's are scarce.
Here's my 460 & a mystery red handled pair. I use the red one all the time. Very heavy & well made. I'd like to know who manufactured it?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250422_210318568.jpg
    IMG_20250422_210318568.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 18
  • IMG_20250422_210149222.jpg
    IMG_20250422_210149222.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 18
  • IMG_20250422_205910291.jpg
    IMG_20250422_205910291.jpg
    770.5 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_20250422_205945072.jpg
    IMG_20250422_205945072.jpg
    890 KB · Views: 25

AntiqueBen

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Messages
1,438
Several years ago I was happy to find a pair of 420's stamped with the 1933 patent date. I don't see to many of these around here anyways. I mostly find them stamped with the 1953 patent.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250422_185638608.jpg
    IMG_20250422_185638608.jpg
    968.3 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_20250422_185651482.jpg
    IMG_20250422_185651482.jpg
    969.2 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_20250422_185705533~2.jpg
    IMG_20250422_185705533~2.jpg
    662 KB · Views: 13

DetailSeeker

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 8, 2024
Messages
179
Location
South-eastern Ontario
Snagged a No. 410 (Heavy Duty General Utility) this morning. It's a little fugly. I'm going to have to clean it up more aggressively, and then re-arrange my Lugzsonian display. I currently have a No. 420 hanging over the 1942 catalog cover, where the No. 410 belongs. And while I am at it, find a place for a ball-pein hammer, too.
Alright, have to ask: the washer goes between the two pieces of plier, right? I took apart a 410 to clean it for the library, and it didn't have a washer, so I'm guessing it's not the first time it's been disassembled. (It's already been put back together, and I am not fighting with the nut and bolt again, but it'd be good to know for next time.)

channellock-front-410.jpgchannellock-back-410.jpg

I picked this cool box up from Roy that originally held a half dozen 410 Channellocks. Now I have to dig some out to fill it up. Here are pictures of the box and some 410 pictures and information.
-Don72E68B61-B4DC-46D1-A7AD-0A4E40A9AEA4.jpeg2CD00441-6702-4D56-AA40-DC22C3F7E46B.jpeg15212858-96B6-4D04-B7A9-DFF85B3E5556.jpeg80B9CF87-5B8D-4B76-B1A5-C39E4E3FEFBC.jpeg6FAD1A5A-2297-4FEF-9B1A-C24F7B85AF6D.jpegE1604A66-1629-4DF9-BB5E-1023B51E9EBE.jpeg98F362B8-F480-4EB4-A97A-C9CA52C303C9.jpeg2F9B07C9-6004-407D-8E2E-D90094D39E45.jpeg
The close-up of the box that actually shows "TRADE MARK REG. U.S. PAT. OFFICE" actually clued me in that the little "REG. U.S. PAT. OFF." on the handle could have been referring to a trademark, not a patent. (Yes, I know this is probably clear to many of you. I'm tired and if I knew this, I forgot it. Yes, I realize it's also on the 1953 catalog page. What can I say, the red ink on the blue box stands out more.)

This 410 has no patent date anywhere, which I was guessing meant it was made between March 6, 1951 (when the 1933 patent expired) and April 15, 1952 (when the new one was issued). That feels like a ridiculously specific timeframe, and I am sceptical about being able to narrow it down so much.

That said, when I poked the USPTO, the oldest Channellock trademark I could find was registered in October 1949. Is it possible that once the trademark registration was received, DeArment just started stamping "REG. U.S. PAT. OFF." on the handle, intending to cover both the patent and the trademark? Or am I overthinking again?

- Frances
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,574
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
Alright, have to ask: the washer goes between the two pieces of plier, right? I took apart a 410 to clean it for the library, and it didn't have a washer, so I'm guessing it's not the first time it's been disassembled. (It's already been put back together, and I am not fighting with the nut and bolt again, but it'd be good to know for next time.)
Hmm. Well, if I have to answer: this washer was under the cap head bolt. But, now that you ask, I don't recall seeing any washers anywhere on any pliers in my Champion DeArment collection. I'm not going to take them all apart, but a cursory visual inspection doesn't show any. Either a PO put the washer there - and if so, selected a perfect size, or all of my others are missing their washers.
Is it possible that once the trademark registration was received, DeArment just started stamping "REG. U.S. PAT. OFF." on the handle, intending to cover both the patent and the trademark?
I have several pliers with patent number markings and the "[CHAN][NEL][LOCK] REG. U.S. PAT OFF." logo, which would lead me to suspect that what you are suggesting as a possibility was not a universal policy or procedure.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,574
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
^ Works just fine. It doesn't change the functional geometry at all. The nut controls that. With or without a washer, you can make any model Channellock as loose or as tight as you want with the nut. If it's too tight, it won't turn and the jaws won't open, and if it's too loose, the excess play in the handles makes them dysfunctional. Obviously, if a washer under the cap head bolt were so thick that there weren't enough threads showing for the nut to grab hold, the internals would not mesh at all, either. But the play in these 410's is fine. In fact, the OP may have felt it was an improvement. I just found it funny that not only did I not think about the washer being an oddity when I posted it, nobody else did either. Frances really does live up to her username! :)
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,574
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
The last non-duplicate Channellock I saw in the wild was last August with the No. 307 battery pliers. Happy to break the drought with these No. 3017-1/2 long needle-nose pliers, no wire cutters, found in a tackle type toolbox this morning at the flea. Arrow flight grip. This makes fifteen (15) unique models in the collection, if I am counting right. I really have to update the board one of these days.

1763182616551.png
 

Attachments

  • 20251114_190615.jpg
    20251114_190615.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 5
  • 20251114_191030.jpg
    20251114_191030.jpg
    609.3 KB · Views: 5
  • 20251114_190228.jpg
    20251114_190228.jpg
    593.3 KB · Views: 5
  • 20251114_190206.jpg
    20251114_190206.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 6
  • 20251114_190148.jpg
    20251114_190148.jpg
    645.4 KB · Views: 6
OP
D

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,549
Location
Northern California
A couple of recent finds. The nut on this pair was over tight and adjustment was impossible. I was unable to get the nut loose with any wrench and finally had to clamp it in my vise to get it to move. It’s working fine now. I didn’t find any dating information on them. IMG_6102.jpeg
I pulled these rusty #460 Channellocks out of the evaporust today. These were made right before the transition from nut and bolt to rivets.
Before. IMG_9674.jpeg
After.IMG_6115.jpegIMG_6116.jpegIMG_6117.jpegIMG_6118.jpeg
-Don
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom