Fluid Film's useful stuff. For smaller hand tools, I keep a rag well spritzed with FF in an old glass peanut butter jar. When I have wiped a number of items with the rag, I respray it in the jar and put the lid back on.
There's also pair on this thread (post #30).I saw a pair of these posted elsewhere on the GJ...




Neat, thanks for the tip!Normally the dynamic jaw can be removed easily. I suspect that the threads on the end of the jaw may have been damaged or deformed. You should check it and possibly dress up any visible problem with a file so it can come apart for cleaning.
That is a nice one with the early anvil marking. Those aren’t all that common.
-Don



-Don









Not Channellock, but it is a tie clip.Found this on eBay and it arrived today. I’ve seen many lapel pins but never a tie clip!
I have a problem with leaving Channellocks behind,
Same here, I have a couple of 460's, plus A similar pair with red grips. 480's are scarce.I have my eye out for a pair of 480's. I've found up to 460's, but the big one evades me.
Here's my 460 & a mystery red handled pair. I use the red one all the time. Very heavy & well made. I'd like to know who manufactured it?Same here, I have a couple of 460's, plus A similar pair with red grips. 480's are scarce.
Alright, have to ask: the washer goes between the two pieces of plier, right? I took apart a 410 to clean it for the library, and it didn't have a washer, so I'm guessing it's not the first time it's been disassembled. (It's already been put back together, and I am not fighting with the nut and bolt again, but it'd be good to know for next time.)Snagged a No. 410 (Heavy Duty General Utility) this morning. It's a little fugly. I'm going to have to clean it up more aggressively, and then re-arrange my Lugzsonian display. I currently have a No. 420 hanging over the 1942 catalog cover, where the No. 410 belongs. And while I am at it, find a place for a ball-pein hammer, too.


The close-up of the box that actually shows "TRADE MARK REG. U.S. PAT. OFFICE" actually clued me in that the little "REG. U.S. PAT. OFF." on the handle could have been referring to a trademark, not a patent. (Yes, I know this is probably clear to many of you. I'm tired and if I knew this, I forgot it. Yes, I realize it's also on the 1953 catalog page. What can I say, the red ink on the blue box stands out more.)
Hmm. Well, if I have to answer: this washer was under the cap head bolt. But, now that you ask, I don't recall seeing any washers anywhere on any pliers in my Champion DeArment collection. I'm not going to take them all apart, but a cursory visual inspection doesn't show any. Either a PO put the washer there - and if so, selected a perfect size, or all of my others are missing their washers.Alright, have to ask: the washer goes between the two pieces of plier, right? I took apart a 410 to clean it for the library, and it didn't have a washer, so I'm guessing it's not the first time it's been disassembled. (It's already been put back together, and I am not fighting with the nut and bolt again, but it'd be good to know for next time.)
I have several pliers with patent number markings and the "[CHAN][NEL][LOCK] REG. U.S. PAT OFF." logo, which would lead me to suspect that what you are suggesting as a possibility was not a universal policy or procedure.Is it possible that once the trademark registration was received, DeArment just started stamping "REG. U.S. PAT. OFF." on the handle, intending to cover both the patent and the trademark?
Me eitherI don’t recall seeing washers as well.






