Ko-ken has definitely gone against the grain, and the mainstream. Since the 2000's, with the majority of manufacturers on a race/competition to produce high-tooth count ratchets, one would think Ko-ken would've produced their own, fine-tooth pear head ratchet, especially with the introduction of their Zeal lineup, but NO, they decided to still stick with a coarse-tooth ratchet.
What they did do with the Zeal series ratchets is that they decided to make their first floating, single pawl mechanism based on Snap-on's 36-tooth mechanism. One of their key requirements was to maintain the low resistance backdrag that users have come to favour from their orthodox mechanism (based on Proto's design). To do so, they modified the standard 36-tooth floating pawl mechanism so that it still operated with the same backdrag resistance as their Proto type mechanism.
This illustrates the torque figure between Zeal's mechanism (1.9 cNm), against their standard line (1.9 cNm), and contrasts it against the 36-tooth, single-pawl mechanism from two competitors (6.5 cNm and 8.5 cNm).
Ko-ken is clearly passionate about producing rachets that perform with low resistance backdrag. In that category alone, I don't think any other ratchet manufacturer currently produces a mechanism as smooth as Ko-ken's.
Imo, Ko-ken takes ratcheting feel much more seriously than the mainstream push for the highest tooth count.
I'm not saying they are entirely right, but I certainly respect their decision to stick to their core philosophy/principle, despite the industry trending on fine-tooth ratchets. They aren't jumping on the bandwagon.
.....at least not yet