TTLLOGIC
Well-known member
that base is awesome ... did it come with a t-handle for the hole?
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
No unfortunately, I am going to make one that matches the original.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
that base is awesome ... did it come with a t-handle for the hole?
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
While I am at it, Here is an old pipe vise that was in my Grandfathers old city house. This looked like this when I was 5 as young as I remember. Down in cellar with my little stash of tools and a workbench with a little clamp on vise.
But old, olny markings are in the picture. over the years, I took the old square head nuts & bolts out and put reg. stuff in there. I assume something from Pennsylvania? With the keystone emblem?
Picked up this really nice Columbian 603 1/2 M2 for $20 Needs a little cleaning up, but appears to be for the most part unused.
You hoarding all these vises or flipping them?
It has been over a month since i posted about the my Reed 403 1/2 find.
I have finally "restored" the vise. I was going to go all the way with prep and paint, however I liked the patina after the the wire wheel work so much, I decided to leave it raw and just ended up coating it with paste wax.
The screw engagement on this vise is pretty great with about one and a quarter inch of movement of the handle at the end to get the jaw moving.
I did attach a before image for reference.
Thanks for all the great info!
Picked up this really nice Columbian 603 1/2 M2 for $20 Needs a little cleaning up, but appears to be for the most part unused. Jaws and perfect.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hoarding for the inevitable vise apocalypse. [emoji16]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
While restoring the the Reed 403 1/2 in an earlier post, I also stumbled upon another vise while cruising the "for sale" sites.
I picked up this Parker 384 1/2 A Swivel Head vise for $70. All the original parts seemed to be present. It looks like it was barely used and the jaws have good sharp serrations.
The person had left it out for a yard sale so it picked up a bit of rust on the base after all the local rain. Once again the pin for the swivel head was seized, but this time I went at it with a little more gusto and got it out in less than a day. I stripped it down to parts and did a bit of wire wheel work on the small parts and left the red paint on it for now.
I could not find much info on this vise but the A designation seems like it is one of the later models before the switch to a different manufacturer. I will say that the manufacturing quality is down from the Reed, but it is still a lot nicer than the Asian vises on Amazon. The thread engagement is definitely looser as it takes over a half turn of the handle to get the dynamic jaw to move.
This thing is nearly twice the size and weight of the Reed and kind of a bear to move. However I still like this vice a lot. But that Reed did kind of spoil me.
No before pics but there is a combo pic of my Parker, Reed, and Irwin "Record" vises.
I am SO going to use that line!
Brian

Just curious but it appears your Parker swivel jaw is missing the cross pin on the swivel jaw. I think it keeps the swivel jaw from lifting up? Any way it looks great nice and straight with little wear or abuse.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you think this line will finally convince one's bride that there is a method to madness of hoarding vises?![]()

When all that's left is Chinese iron.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
one needs a handle, right what about missing most of the slide? That's a pretty rare pipe vise. I found a catalog scan from 1905.
gman, the Parker 206 also appears to be missing the pin that should engage in the swivel base to rotate it (this pin is missing in the last photo). I would pull the swivel base off and look inside. You may find that even more of the internal parts are missing. To me the Parker is a parts vise at this point.
Any idea what this is?
The anvil horn and covered spindle makes me think Craftsman. The seller says he sees no maker's mark.
I saw this AD, $175 for what appears to be Parker 206 (5") and American Red Seal 64 (4"). It also stated one needs a handle. Not a problem for me, can easily have one made. Not the best deal in the world but pretty reasonable. I am partial to Parkers have three Parkers (204,974,955) and would love to have a 206.
Then I see the second photoone needs a handle, right what about missing most of the slide?
![]()
Spotted a vise on eBay that has me really intrigued. It's marked as a Columbian 604 which is a standard 4" Columbian model... except this one looks absolutely nothing like a typical Columbian and instead looks more like a Parker 974 but without the special Parker jaws and collar. Never seen anything like this. Does anyone have an explanation or any evidence of this in a catalog?
No affiliation with the seller but here's the link.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Columbian-604-Bench-Vise-/163132001474
That's a 1st generation Columbian, probably pre-1915. I found a 1918 ad of a 2nd gen Columbian for comparison. 3rd gen was the "T" style jaws around 1925.
That's one of the oldest Columbian vises I've seen.
That's
Awesome. Thanks for the info. On closer look there are some more subtle differences from Parker styling, but at first glance it sure looked like one to me. They really developed a totally different, uniquely Columbian style later on.
I also had no idea they were "malleable iron" all the way back then. I thought that was a much later development.