noid if there was a Tone koolaid, you'd have it all. Sorry man but they have stuff made in Taiwan for them and Japans COO restrictions aren't remotely as strict as the US so im not exactly sure why you're dropping words like "illegal" and "crime". The US has ZERO regulation as far as outside country of origin is concerned which is why so much junk is "made in mexico" when its blatantly just been assembled there out of components manufactured in Asia. (just one example)
Lets be clear, there is nothing wrong with having stuff made in Taiwan. The question at hand is whether that is the case and if there is misleading occurring.
Commercial international trade compliance; let me clarify.
The US has significant punitive regulations regarding COO of imports, as do most countries. In most cases, if intentional, the audits result in a criminal investigation.
CBP (US):
https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/de...origin-marking-on-goods-imported-into-the-u.s.
http://ccbjournal.com/articles/6740...oduct-origin-can-result-substantial-penalties
CBSA AMPS penalties(Canada):
https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/trade-commerce/amps/mpd-dmi-eng.html
Japan:
https://home.kpmg.com/**/en/home/in...customs-declarations-or-non-declarations.html
This would include when TONE is supposedly importing TW>Japan and any time TONE does business internationally, or provides COO information to a IOR (importer of record).
There are explicit laws prescribing when a product is considered to have been "advanced in value" sufficiently to be marked made in a country when its internal components originated elsewhere.
That is why I specifically asked TONE if 100% of the wrench was made in Japan, by TONE in a TONE factory.
I'm open to the idea that it may not be true, but what solid proof points to the contrary?
It is not false that Hi-Five had sell sheets for those ratchets before Tone. I explicitly remember Taiwan tradeshow PDFs 6-8 years ago with a number of tools, those ratchets being one of them.
Like I said initially, the relationship between the design, patent and manufacturer could go in any number of directions.
Perhaps Hi-five owns a design patent, perhaps its another company, or perhaps there is no design patent.
Other than the patent holder (if a patent exists) who cares? To your point below; good design is good design regardless.
You can hem and haw over it if you like, maybe even remain in denial a little bit, but as I said, I personally don't care. High quality tools is high quality tools. If you buy based off COO alone you're severely limiting your options from many great manufacturers the world over.
To be in denial, I think first I would need something to deny. Speculation is hardly something to hang on too.
I almost never buy exclusively based on COO. But I sure do care if a company is deceitful.
To that end, i'm not drinking anyone's koolaid; especially the speculative koolaid.
While we are on a speculative topic of lowest denominator; USA made Ruger SR1911? Or is it really just a re-stamped Rock Island Armory 1911 nickle being made in the Philippines? Or perhaps even worse, maybe they are circumventing trade embargoes from china in a plot to stamp Norinco 1911's with USA stamps.
Very spooky stuff.