I just re-watched his video. he didn't say it didn't do what it was supposed to do. What it boiled down to is that it didn't fit into his process. There are multiple ways to arrive at an answer. What's important is to find a tool that aligns with your preference and level of diagnostic knowledge. If you aren't comfortable with ohms law or Kirchhoff's laws you need something that aligns with your knowledge to use, but there's super super smart guys that just use test lights most of the time, but they know how to apply it properly and what they are telling them.
What I appreciated about PHAD's approach is that he articulated the electrical theory and was smart and learned enough to understand the limitations of the loadpro. things like intermittent fault requiring more amperage to reproduce, like a relay that fails when heat-soaked or duty cycle controlled circuits may require a different approach. His other concern was the size, but if you aren't getting a loadpro in you aren't getting a power probe in either.
At the end of the day each issue requires a choice of what tool to use, and you may not use the same one each time. LoadPro and Power Probe don't do the same things. They are different tools and require different methodologies to use. If your thought process makes more sense to use one or the other, more power to you. I advocate knowing why you are choosing what you are chosing. It can be really easy to mess things up with a power probe. LoadPro not so much. I find a lot of people don't know how to properly use a power probe, but also don't understand what a loadpro is telling them. Whatever you use, take some time to understand why things are doing what they are doing and some basic theory behind it.
I was going to **** it up and watch both vids (each about 50 minutes long), but found that part 2 is gone. Even searched his video stash, and no Part 2 that I could find.
IIRC part 2 was about how the inventor responded with bashing his video and how wrong he was in his part 1, and going about showing how/why his review was right.

