I would take any new-off-the-truck Snap-On dual 80 with a 2026 date code over literally every product SK ever made. No thanks.
That ratchet has survived because of the short handle. Its to be expected that asking more leads to a higher failure rate.
Yes. I have owned many SK. Still have couple. Have failed one or two. Seen many skipped because of sheared teeth. Seen many sloppy worn. But, have couple by weeding out poorer ones, have survived and still good. Like most other tools that era, were fairly well made and served purpose well. Same can be said for quality makes today. But, quality makes today have advantage better technology and design. SK suffered from different quality levels over the years, could never count on them.
I'm always amazed guys like JBLnut that have antique Craftsman set used steadily and still performing satisfactorily. Dad had complete set old V series 1966 he felt same way about, and he used on his small farm. He carefully preserved it, bought cheap tools to use when he had to abuse to "save" the good Craftsman. In 70's, it was good set. By time 2000 came around he didn't use much anymore but was worn and aged and wasn't nearly as good it had been in the 70's. As a homeowner quality set got used up even at moderate use over 30 years. If I used that worn set like my current tools, I'd bet 30% of it would be failed and discarded within few months to year. And, I don't use tools to extent a large farm full time mechanic or millwright or professional mechanic would.
I worked my way from Craftsman, up to SK, eventually to Wright, MAC, Proto and Snap-on over a 40 year time using tools. I wore out Craftsman. Outgrew much of the SK, needing better tools, particularly sockets, screwdrivers and ratchets. Haven't outgrown better pro level tools. Of course, could have simply replaced 3 or 4 sets of CM and SK in that time, with some things being replaced 15 or 20 times (the MAC and Proto and Snap-on versions of those items have also been replaced a few times).