To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Ingersoll Rand W5130 3/8" Cordless Impact

GSteg

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
1,295
Location
Earth
Mods, please move this thread if you wish. I only post here because the Product and Vendor Review forum is filled with seller feedback. Not much product review in there..

Also, excuse me for any grammatical error(s). Didn't have time to proofread.

Ingersoll Rand W5130 Review

Meet the W5130, the 3/8” little brother to the popular W7150. From the looks of it, Ingersoll Rand basically took the W7150 and shrunk it down in size. Everything about it is smaller, except the handle because it’s actually the same size as the W7150. It feels just like the W7150, but lighter. The W5130 comes with a compact 1.5 AH (BL2005), but can be used with the larger 3.0 AH (BL2010) for a longer runtime. However, the compact battery does not work with the W7150 for those who are wondering.

Drive Size: 3/8”
Max Torque Reverse: 180 ft-lbs (BL2005) / 190 ft-lbs (BL2010)
Recommended Torque Range: 25-135 ft-lbs (BL2005) / 25-140 ft-lbs (BL2010)
BPM: 2800 (BL2005) / 2900 (BL2010)
Free Speed RPM: 1700
Weight w/Battery: 3.6 lbs (BL2005)
Length: 6.6 inches
Sound Level: 91 dBA
Vibration: 8.8 m/s2
*Specifications pulled from Ingersoll Rand’s website


IMG_8076_Medium.jpg


IMG_8075_Medium.jpg



As I’ve said before, the W5130 is a miniature version of the W7150. Those who own the W7150 will find the W5130 very familiar. The over-molded rubber grip, forward-reverse switch, variable trigger, etc are pretty much carried over from the larger 1/2”. What’s unfamiliar is the LED light that sits below the brushed metal nose-cone. When I first saw the LED, my initial thought was “Oh no, it’s going to light up everything except the fastener.” My 3/8” Bosch impact LED lighting system is horrendous. The nose-cone gets partially in the way of the light so I can never see the fastener I’m bolting down. Surprisingly, the LED on the W5130 works much better. I normally don’t care for LEDs, but this one actually works! No shadows at all.


IMG_8073_Medium.jpg



The BL2005 (1.5AH) is the compact battery in the IQV20 line-up. Like most other brands, the compact battery is essentially half the capacity of the full-size battery. Using my analog scale, it weighs in at 14.5oz. In comparison, the larger BL2010 battery is approximately 25oz. The difference may seem small, but it makes quite a difference to the balance of the tool. Even with the larger BL2010, the W5130 is still reasonably balanced, more so than the Snap On CT4410A.

Okay, enough with the small talk. How well does this thing perform? Does it dominate its class like the W7150? Sort of. While the W5130 is rated at 180-190 ft-lbs, I found the limit of the gun lower than that. It has no problem undoing most fasteners under the hood. To see what it can do, I torqued my 19mm lug nut to 80 ft-lbs. Sure it took it off, but it hammered quite a lot doing so. Sad to say, it struggled with it. I was disappointed because I thought the W5130 would be more capable. Bear in mind I was using the compact battery. On paper, the difference in torque is almost negligible when switching to the BL2010. Since I already have the BL2010, I figured I’ll try it out. Torqued the lug nut to 80 ft-lbs again, zap zap, and the nut is off. Was that a fluke? I bumped it up to 100 ft-lbs and that was no problem. How about 125 ft-lbs? Yup, the W5130 removed it in less than 5 seconds which is pretty good for something of this size. But WHAT A DIFFERENCE the battery makes!! It’s like the strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. I have yet to test the limits of this gun, but I’m guessing it’ll top out at its maximum working range, which is 135-140 ft-lbs. Again, these were freshly torqued bolts I was playing with. Like any other impact gun, it won’t meet its number if the bolts are rusted to death, but it’s nice to know I can remove properly torqued lug nuts when push comes to shove. It's quite a beast with the BL2010.


IMG_8077_Medium.jpg



In the end, I feel the W5130 is a great addition to Ingersoll’s line-up. It’s not the best choice if it’s going to be your only gun, but it complements the W7150. While it has power to remove bolts torque to 100 ft-lbs, I feel it’s best to keep it in its territory. Grab the compact battery and use it on fasteners that you would normally use a 3/8” drive for, and you’ll be a happy camper.

On a side note: When I first reviewed the W7150, I criticized IR for not offering a protective boot. Months later, they offered one so kudos to them. I’m hoping they will follow up on the W5130 because the nose-cone will be prone to scratches.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Marlin

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
1,037
Gsteg,

The boot is available a bit sooner on this one, part # W5130-BOOT
 
OP
G

GSteg

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
1,295
Location
Earth
Here's a couple of videos I just took. Battery is showing 2 out of 4.


80 ft-lbs (Recommended spec for this car)
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Lgg3EI5LzFw?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

90 ft-lbs
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fQ1on1Xd7U0?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

130 ft-lbs - just for fun
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_QWXwazgABo?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


The battery is still showing 2 out of 4. I wouldn't be surprised if I could hit all 4 wheels (torqued to 90) and still have power left. I don't normally use a 3/8" cordless impact to remove lug nuts, but at least you know it will probably remove most of the fasteners (reasonable sized) under your hood.
 

bimmerZ5

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
1,790
strange.. my W5130 doesn't seem to be as powerful. with a fully charged BL2010, trying to get the lug bolts off my BMW torqued to 89ft-lbs was more like your 130ft-lbs video... it definitely took several seconds and had to impact quite a bit. it did eventually get it off...
 

bimmerZ5

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
1,790
are you using a shallow socket like mine?

yeah, shallow 17mm impact (Sunex). no adapters or extensions.

correction: if by "shallow" you mean standard depth socket, then yes... if "shallow" meaning shallower than standard depth, then no...

clarification: in case it might matters, the BMWs use lug bolts instead of lug nuts.. there's no threaded stud on the wheel hub side. not sure if that would make it harder or easier to take off...
 
Last edited:

IONH

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
2,043
Location
Central Massachusetts
yeah, shallow 17mm impact (Sunex). no adapters or extensions.

correction: if by "shallow" you mean standard depth socket, then yes... if "shallow" meaning shallower than standard depth, then no...

clarification: in case it might matters, the BMWs use lug bolts instead of lug nuts.. there's no threaded stud on the wheel hub side. not sure if that would make it harder or easier to take off...

Torque should be torque, I don't think bolts or nuts should really matter.

Did you install the lug bolts yourself the last time with a torque wrench or are you just assuming the prior installer torqued them correctly?

How old is the BMW, could rust in the threads be playing a factor?
 

bimmerZ5

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
1,790
Torque should be torque, I don't think bolts or nuts should really matter.

Did you install the lug bolts yourself the last time with a torque wrench or are you just assuming the prior installer torqued them correctly?

How old is the BMW, could rust in the threads be playing a factor?

I appreciate the questions, but yeah.. I take care of all my BMWs myself. So, yes, I torqued the lugs myself. And I would never let my car get rusty, plus i'm in SoCal so no road salt. The cars are more than 10yrs old, but they are very clean and the wheels get removed for inspections/cleaning (by me) a couple times a year at least. Taking the lugs off by hand (with breaker bar) or with the W7150 (less than a second) is no problem.... but the W5130 is like the 130 ft-lbs video above... even though they are torqued to 89ft-lbs.
 

IONH

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
2,043
Location
Central Massachusetts
I didn't watch the videos as I browse GJ mostly from work where YouTube or whatever is blocked.

From the description, I wouldn't be concerned. Two different materials and who's to say that the sample 130 ft/lb was really 130 ft/lb. IMO, not equivalent tests.

The impact has a warranty so you should be covered if you use it and it fails.
 

dvaka

New member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
1
Marlin,

Where did you find the boot for the w5130, I can't find it anywhere thanks.

Derek
 

Marlin

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
1,037
Marlin,

Where did you find the boot for the w5130, I can't find it anywhere thanks.

Derek

Sorry for the delay, I was on vacation. You should be able to get it from any authorized IR distributor. I just Googled it an several sources came up. Let me know if you cannot find it.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

IONH

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
2,043
Location
Central Massachusetts

Yup, it's also 9.6 pounds versus the IR 5130's 3.6 pounds (with battery). Maybe you meant to claim this against the W7150 which comes in at a claimed 6.8 pounds with battery based on their website. Of course, then we'd know who won the torque contest with that comparison.

How would you like to lug that around at 2.5x the weight of the IR 5130 with a gain of only 10-20 ft/lb of torque.
 

FiendFX

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
812
Location
California
Yup, it's also 9.6 pounds versus the IR 5130's 3.6 pounds (with battery). Maybe you meant to claim this against the W7150 which comes in at a claimed 6.8 pounds with battery based on their website. Of course, then we'd know who won the torque contest with that comparison.

How would you like to lug that around at 2.5x the weight of the IR 5130 with a gain of only 10-20 ft/lb of torque.

I'm just saying it's cheaper and stronger and it's brushless. It's much practical for me since I got other 18V Milwaukee line.

Why would you want to compare the 3/8 Milwaukee with a W7150???

If 9.6lbs is too heavy for you, you don't have to buy it... Just sharing my thoughts.
 
OP
G

GSteg

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
1,295
Location
Earth
It's much practical for me since I got other 18V Milwaukee line.

The same argument can be said for those who already own the IR 20v line. Chances are, there are lots of W7150 owners out there and the W5130 is meant to complement it.
 

bimmerZ5

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
1,790
Right. The milwaukee is brushless. Life span and stronger and cheaper is a plus.

yeah, but then you don't get the sparks shooting out the backside from the motor brushes breaking in. and real men like sparks, flames, and rumbling noises!
 

IONH

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
2,043
Location
Central Massachusetts
There is a benefit of sharing batteries between tools. If you don't use one or the other sets for long enough periods of time, the battery life is shortened.
 
OP
G

GSteg

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
1,295
Location
Earth
Right. The milwaukee is brushless. Life span and stronger and cheaper is a plus.


Of course, but what if I wanted the most powerful 1/2" impact gun? I'd have to buy into a new battery system because the Milwaukee is not cutting it. Now you pay more in the long run because you have to buy another kit. If I was looking to buy just a 3/8" impact with no plans for expansion, then yes, the Milwaukee is a better deal. But for those who already own a W7150, why spend more to get another platform just for a single tool?
 

Rezeppa

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
444
Location
Newport, MI
Hey, man, don't be bringing practicality into this discussion!

:)

This had me laughing so hard but, I had just recently made the argument that I have not replaced brushes on anything beside a Metabo in the past 5 years.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom