To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Sears/Craftsman "made in USA" lawsuit - what were the results?

Farmall450

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
13,368
Location
Marengo, Illinois
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/sears_craftsman.html

From a long time ago, what ended up happening?

Suit Hits Sears Made In USA Claim
Craftsman tools use parts from many countries, suit charges

12/08/2004 | ConsumerAffairs | Sears and Kmart News
facebook
twitter
google+
email
print
A class action lawsuit against Sears, Roebuck and Co alleges that Sears conducted false advertising and consumer fraud by advertising that its Craftsman tool line is "Made in the USA."

The suit alleges that promotions in ads, the website, on signs and labels claiming that Craftsman is "Made in the USA" led consumers to purchase the tools out of a sense of patriotism. Consumers were also led to believe that Craftsman is of high quality because it is "Made in the USA."

Pictures attached to the complaint show metal parts from Austria, Denmark, China, India and Mexico on Craftsman tools labeled as "Made in the USA."

"Sears has falsely touted Craftsman tools as 'Made in the USA' when the Federal Trade Commission has issued guidelines stating that such a claim is proper only where all or substantially all of the product is U.S.A. made. Sears Craftsman is misleading consumers by invoking that claim," said Barbara J. Hart, attorney for the tool buyers.

The lawsuit, which seeks class-action status and unspecified damages, was filed last week in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

1982fxr

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
10,012
Location
Phoenix

SMKS

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 14, 2010
Messages
5,832
Location
USA, planet Earth
When I worked for York manufacturing, assembling AC units, I questioned their "Made in the USA" claims. Most "moving" parts were built and shipped from South America. (Motors, compressors, wire harnesses). Only things such as top/bottom pans, coils, copper lines, etc. were made in house. There response was simply, they only had to manufacture a small percentage and assemble them here to meet the criteria. They could have been blowing me off, who knows. I do know they have been bought out by Johnson Controls. :dunno:

Could be a loophole Sears uses?

This has been posted a million times, but here's a simple, easy-to-understand site that spells out the rules for labeling an item "made in the USA."

http://www.business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard
 
OP
F

Farmall450

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
13,368
Location
Marengo, Illinois
When I worked for York manufacturing, assembling AC units, I questioned their "Made in the USA" claims. Most "moving" parts were built and shipped from South America. (Motors, compressors, wire harnesses). Only things such as top/bottom pans, coils, copper lines, etc. were made in house. There response was simply, they only had to manufacture a small percentage and assemble them here to meet the criteria. They could have been blowing me off, who knows. I do know they have been bought out by Johnson Controls. :dunno:

Could be a loophole Sears uses?

Probably

funny how that works, huh? Mega billion dollar company makes millions and millions by misleading people, millions and millions of them...and they get pass because they screwed over too many people!

Yeah, glad to see our justice system in action.

This has been posted a million times, but here's a simple, easy-to-understand site that spells out the rules for labeling an item "made in the USA."

http://www.business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

Funny, I haven't seen it in the years I've been on here...
 

Steinmetz

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Messages
2,274
Location
Washington State

1982fxr

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
10,012
Location
Phoenix
I saw a documentary where it told about corporations going to lengths to close off the legal system from consumers.

remember the greedy stupid ***** who sued Mcdonald's for too hot of coffee?

truth was it was like a 90 year old woman in a parked car being driven by her grandson. She tried to get the stupid lid off to cool it down and it spilled all all over her inner thighs. She almost died! The doc shows the pictures--they are EXTREMELY graphic. So after almost dying, she asked (not sued) mcdonalds to pay the hospital bills.

Of course they would not, so it ended up in court where she still only wanted the bills covered. The JURY awarded her that huge amount of money, she didn't even ask for it.

Then the media went into high gear, ignoring the truth and today you can still hear mindless radio, news, etc people babbling on about the greedy lady who sued them...
 

Steinmetz

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Messages
2,274
Location
Washington State
I saw a documentary where it told about corporations going to lengths to close off the legal system from consumers.

remember the greedy stupid ***** who sued Mcdonald's for too hot of coffee?

truth was it was like a 90 year old woman in a parked car being driven by her grandson. She tried to get the stupid lid off to cool it down and it spilled all all over her inner thighs. She almost died! The doc shows the pictures--they are EXTREMELY graphic. So after almost dying, she asked (not sued) mcdonalds to pay the hospital bills.

Of course they would not, so it ended up in court where she still only wanted the bills covered. The JURY awarded her that huge amount of money, she didn't even ask for it.

Then the media went into high gear, ignoring the truth and today you can still hear mindless radio, news, etc people babbling on about the greedy lady who sued them...

Largely true. The victim required skin-grafting for her injuries, and that doesn't come cheap. One persuasive piece of evidence was that McDonalds had received numerous complaints from the public regarding the molten steel they were serving, all prior to the accident.
 

sulfurburner

Active member
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
31
Location
Kansas City area
Largely true. The victim required skin-grafting for her injuries, and that doesn't come cheap. One persuasive piece of evidence was that McDonalds had received numerous complaints from the public regarding the molten steel they were serving, all prior to the accident.

There were actually multiple victims of McD's hot coffee. one of my buddies fiance was one of them. she got burned when she was just a baby. She ended up with big scars on her inner thigh area. I know she ended up with a decent sized settlement (paid for her education and then some).

I took a couple business law classes in college and my professor actually claimed that McD's kept getting hit with lawsuits, but refused to lower the temp. of the coffee because the majority of their customers wanted it extremely hot (I know I enjoy that outer layer of my throat being burned off during the first sip :spit:). In turn the courts started awarding victims more and more $$$$.
 

itguy08

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
119
The Federal Judiciary (including the U.S. Supreme Court) has become increasingly antagonistic toward Class Action suits in recent years. The most common target is the composition and size of the class.

Good! Class actions are a scam of the highest order. Get people who are "victims", then get the company to fork over a token amount of money, the lawyers collect the majority of the money for "expenses" and then each person gets a few dollars for another of the company's products or another very small amount.
 

BFBOB

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
5,073
Good! Class actions are a scam of the highest order. Get people who are "victims", then get the company to fork over a token amount of money, the lawyers collect the majority of the money for "expenses" and then each person gets a few dollars for another of the company's products or another very small amount.

Yes...but,
Take the latest that affected me: eBay was sued over failing to disclose they were taking Final Value Fees out of shipping payments as well as sales payments. I was awarded about 50 cents, probably pretty close to what was unfairly taken. How could I have hired a lawyer to collect that 50 cents? But more to the point, in the process of paying out pennies to a lot of people, eBay got its knuckles nipped to the tune of many millions of dollars. Enough to get the attention of even a company eBay's size, and maybe think twice before cheating more people. I could not have accomplished ANY of that by myself.
So, yes, the lawyers got rich and the plaintiffs got pennies, but it still served the cause of justice.
.
 

1982fxr

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
10,012
Location
Phoenix
Good! Class actions are a scam of the highest order. Get people who are "victims", then get the company to fork over a token amount of money, the lawyers collect the majority of the money for "expenses" and then each person gets a few dollars for another of the company's products or another very small amount.

yeah, i was being a total ***** when i cancelled my LA Fitness membership and they just kept taking money out of my account and wouldn't give it back. Along with a million other people. I'm such a jerk.
 

Skin

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
11,713
Location
Boston
Then the media went into high gear, ignoring the truth and today you can still hear mindless radio, news, etc people babbling on about the greedy lady who sued them...

Its probably true in some sense though because you cant tell me that was the only settlement. Look at Toyota with the accelerator issue that brought tons of low lives out of the wood work just looking for a quick pay day and Blitz gas cans were shut down by frivolous suits claiming their cans weren't "safe enough" for dumping fuel onto a flame.

You see a lot of really idiotic warning labels these days, they didn't get there for no reason. Someone was dumb/careless, got hurt, and sued.
 

Loscaldazar

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2013
Messages
2,385
Its probably true in some sense though because you cant tell me that was the only settlement. Look at Toyota with the accelerator issue that brought tons of low lives out of the wood work just looking for a quick pay day and Blitz gas cans were shut down by frivolous suits claiming their cans weren't "safe enough" for dumping fuel onto a flame.

You see a lot of really idiotic warning labels these days, they didn't get there for no reason. Someone was dumb/careless, got hurt, and sued.

The Toyota example is a really, really, really good one. Especially seeing as how every independent testing agency that investigated cleared Toyota.

For those who don't know, the premise was that the TBW (throttle by wire, ie, electric throttle input, not throttle input by a cable) was shorting out and causing the cars to go full throttle. Of course because they had shorted out, there was no way to reduce throttle input. Many companies were brought in to look into it (including NASA) and said there was no short, no problem, and no fault. Yet Toyota suffered in sales, image, and money that juries STILL rewarded people with. The whole floor mat recall was an attempt at saving face, not so much because an actual problem existed.

Full disclosure- I hate and despise Toyota and their current offerings in the US. I'm far from a fanboy trying to defend them.

EDIT:

Also several owners of Toyotas who didn't even own a car equipped with TBW were awarded money by a jury.... talk about stupid.
 
OP
F

Farmall450

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
13,368
Location
Marengo, Illinois
Yes...but,
Take the latest that affected me: eBay was sued over failing to disclose they were taking Final Value Fees out of shipping payments as well as sales payments. I was awarded about 50 cents, probably pretty close to what was unfairly taken. How could I have hired a lawyer to collect that 50 cents? But more to the point, in the process of paying out pennies to a lot of people, eBay got its knuckles nipped to the tune of many millions of dollars. Enough to get the attention of even a company eBay's size, and maybe think twice before cheating more people. I could not have accomplished ANY of that by myself.
So, yes, the lawyers got rich and the plaintiffs got pennies, but it still served the cause of justice.
.

Agreed.

:beer:
 

b-body-bob

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Messages
1,621
Location
Almost Heaven
Then the media went into high gear, ignoring the truth and today you can still hear mindless radio, news, etc people babbling on about the greedy lady who sued them...

You should read the true story behind the "Welfare Queen" that so inspired Reagan. They were so busy chasing welfare fraud they didn't even look into her background where it now seems she was responsible for kidnapping and murder.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

atwageman

Banned
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
1,140
Location
NC
I like the asbestos commercials the attorney's run on TV.

You work in a factory for 30 years and have no clue about the materials you're dealing with? Or the chemical make up of the materials? I'm not trying to make light of someone with work related cancer, I'm just say'n.
 
OP
F

Farmall450

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
13,368
Location
Marengo, Illinois
I like the asbestos commercials the attorney's run on TV.

You work in a factory for 30 years and have no clue about the materials you're dealing with? Or the chemical make up of the materials? I'm not trying to make light of someone with work related cancer, I'm just say'n.

Exactly! I never understood that...
 

1982fxr

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
10,012
Location
Phoenix
I like the asbestos commercials the attorney's run on TV.

You work in a factory for 30 years and have no clue about the materials you're dealing with? Or the chemical make up of the materials? I'm not trying to make light of someone with work related cancer, I'm just say'n.

Telling the truth to factory workers about the materials they're using has not been and will never be a priority. I've worked in many
 

Agentwho

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
264
Location
Baltimore
I remember the documentary Hot Coffee going into details about the McDonald's case amungs other things. If I remember right the amount was equal to two days of coffee sales, the jury awawded it to them but what you dont hear is that the judge cut it way down.

It was a great documentary, touches on a lot of things you would never hear about otherwise. I think its on Netflix
 

PugetDude

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
22,416
Location
Superstition Mountains, AZ
funny how that works, huh? Mega billion dollar company makes millions and millions by misleading people, millions and millions of them...and they get pass because they screwed over too many people!

As Ronald Reagan so aptly put it: "There you go again ...."
Is there any corporation or business out there you don't hate? :confused:
 

1982fxr

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
10,012
Location
Phoenix
As Ronald Reagan so aptly put it: "There you go again ...."
Is there any corporation or business out there you don't hate? :confused:

I've aired dislike for sears, wal Mart and McDonald's....are those what you mean?

And la fitness. Not exactly a cast of ethical firms though, is it?
 

Hootbro

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
1,465
Location
Delaware
I'm very skeptical of the entire class action lawsuit model, the lawyers that sued the tobacco companies walked away with BILLIONS of dollars.
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/great-tobacco-robbery-lawyers-grab-billions

Make our legal system "loser pays", it would stop a lot of the nonsense. No other country has our crazy litigation problem.

The tobacco settlements are a farce. In addition to just make the lawyers richer, many of the various settlements given to the states for anti-tobacco "education" programs and to help some indigent medically needy smokers, was squandered by the states and went either into the general revenue funds or was spent on other pet projects that had nothing to do with smoking or smokers.

I like UK's civil suit legal model, losing side has to pay both sides legal fees. Makes people think twice about filing ******** suits and to make sure you have a damn good case or it will come back to bite you with legal costs on both sides of the fence.
 

jhendric

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
135
Guys, like most everything the truth is in the middle. I worked for a large corporation for 30+ years and I can say first hand that the very best and brightest minds at that company were in the legal department. The processes are set up in a way that no person is accountable for screwing people, but screw people they do. Large companies are greed engines accountable only to a number. The entire premise of a corporation is that it is in and of itself, legally, a separate entity. This being said, they are critical to the US economy and provide many great jobs but they must be kept in check.

On the other side is a very large group of individuals that are always looking for the easy button they too need to be kept in check.

I do think the legal fees should be capped. My inlaws lived down the creek from one of the lawyers that won against the tobacco companies. Their house and yacht were rather large.
 

zendriver

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 10, 2014
Messages
29,962
Location
Indiana
Results?

Eventually, SBD purchase the craftsman brand, wasted $1 billion on the “state of the art” US factory that, that built mediocre tools,that no one really even wanted in the first place and refused to buy, unless they were deeply discounted.

The whole sorted endeavor **** the bed spectacularly, But did nothing to qualm the desire for domestic manufactured, snap on level quality tools at Harbor freight prices.

Maybe someday. :dunno:
 

finn

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
16,285
Location
The UP, God's country
The Toyota example is a really, really, really good one. Especially seeing as how every independent testing agency that investigated cleared Toyota.

For those who don't know, the premise was that the TBW (throttle by wire, ie, electric throttle input, not throttle input by a cable) was shorting out and causing the cars to go full throttle. Of course because they had shorted out, there was no way to reduce throttle input. Many companies were brought in to look into it (including NASA) and said there was no short, no problem, and no fault. Yet Toyota suffered in sales, image, and money that juries STILL rewarded people with. The whole floor mat recall was an attempt at saving face, not so much because an actual problem existed.

Full disclosure- I hate and despise Toyota and their current offerings in the US. I'm far from a fanboy trying to defend them.

EDIT:

Also several owners of Toyotas who didn't even own a car equipped with TBW were awarded money by a jury.... talk about stupid.
I think the Audi issue ended up being the design ergonomics that put the accelerator too close to the gas pedal.

From what I remember of the Toyota issue, it was actually the design of the gas pedal that got fouled up with floor mats.

Sometimes these seemingly bogus class action suits identify real Issues of bad design, in the end.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom