I'm surprised by the need for the aluminum housing to dissipate heat - I thought one of the big selling points of LED lights was their distinct lack of heat?
Not so. Some of the heat comes from the power supply, but most of it comes from the LEDs. The switch mode power supplies used are typically better than 90% efficient. That means, at most, 10% of the heat is from the power supply.I think a lot of the heat generated in LED is not the LED itself, but the AC-DC conversion and step down from 120V to perhaps 12V or 5V ? If we had lower voltage DC outlets, I don't think there would be much heat generated.
I'm surprised by the need for the aluminum housing to dissipate heat - I thought one of the big selling points of LED lights was their distinct lack of heat?
Not anymore. And LED's potential efficiency is still unknown, while fluorescent is pretty much maxxed out.LED lighting has generally about the same efficiency as efficient fluorescent lighting.
I contacted them and the price for a 10,000 lumen light was $379.00. They recommended two for my 24 x 24 garage. Still looking at alternatives
Watts is watts. Doesn't matter what the technology is, 100 watts consumed is 100 watts dissipated as heat.
I'm well aware of conservation of energy. If you're going to correct someone you should at least be right. Unless that light is escaping out the window into space, it will eventually be absorbed by the building as heat. I stand by my statement.Quite wrong... time to recall the law of conservation of energy back from high school!
100 watts consumed could be ANY amount dissipated as heat. Light is another form of energy. In a light, the the amount of heat + light generated add up to the watt rating. A 100W incandescent bulb will generate about 95W worth of heat. A 100W LED will only generate anywhere from perhaps as low as 5W to as high as 30W of heat, and produce a TON more light. Of course, whatever is not heat (for all practical purposes) is light output.
That does not seem too bad. That would mean I would need 5 of them for my 30x48 garage at @ $1900.00. I paid $1100 for 17 T8 4 tube 8' fixtures. Which calculate out to ~ a 100 candle ft. solution. from that I can figure out the return on investment based on the power savings.
Problem I see is that if I'm going to replace 17 fixtures with 5, the light distribution will be non uniform.
Not so. Some of the heat comes from the power supply, but most of it comes from the LEDs. The switch mode power supplies used are typically better than 90% efficient. That means, at most, 10% of the heat is from the power supply.
Low voltage DC outlets would lose a tremendous amount of power in the resistance losses in the wiring. This is the reason that electricity is always distributed over long distances as high voltage AC.
Quite wrong... time to recall the law of conservation of energy back from high school!
100 watts consumed could be ANY amount dissipated as heat. Light is another form of energy. In a light, the the amount of heat + light generated add up to the watt rating. A 100W incandescent bulb will generate about 95W worth of heat. A 100W LED will only generate anywhere from perhaps as low as 5W to as high as 30W of heat, and produce a TON more light. Of course, whatever is not heat (for all practical purposes) is light output.
I'm well aware of conservation of energy. If you're going to correct someone you should at least be right. Unless that light is escaping out the window into space, it will eventually be absorbed by the building as heat. I stand by my statement.
I'm surprised by the need for the aluminum housing to dissipate heat - I thought one of the big selling points of LED lights was their distinct lack of heat?
Watts is watts. Doesn't matter what the technology is, 100 watts consumed is 100 watts dissipated as heat.
LED lighting has generally about the same efficiency as efficient fluorescent lighting.
I'm well aware of conservation of energy. If you're going to correct someone you should at least be right. Unless that light is escaping out the window into space, it will eventually be absorbed by the building as heat. I stand by my statement.
I'm surprised by the need for the aluminum housing to dissipate heat - I thought one of the big selling points of LED lights was their distinct lack of heat?
No, actually they are not very similar at all.Of course light and heat are very similar forms of energy.
I simply made a factual statement, not necessarily in response or attempting to correct anyone. This was somewhat relevant at the time due to other threads at that time discussing air conditioning heat load due to lighting.But since the discussion you responded to was that the heat sinks were quite large despite them thinking LED was much more efficient, and you responded that they put out 100W of heat, I'm sure if you understand the physics involved you understand why that sounded quite confused.
You could have simply stated that instead of taking your condescending tone and trying to 'school me' on physics.The heat sinks are not there because the fixture "puts out 100W of heat energy". What happens with the light once it's left the fixture is irrelevant to the heat sink design of the fixture. The fixture puts out primarily light.
Strawman argument.I suppose you could say it puts out primarily mechanical energy, because you've put a solar panel below it running an electric motor?
True, but I suspect the typical garage will not contain many plants or photocells that will be turning the light into chemical or electrical energy. For all practical purposes, the light is quickly turned into heat.With that said, the IR is what will most directly be absorbed by another material and converted to heat.
Visible light will as well, but not as many materials absorb it and convert it into heat. It will be conserved, stored or converted in other ways such as plants absorbing for photosynthesis, photovoltaic cells in your calculator, etc.
we have a dairy. the intial price might be high but they money leds save will come out on top. ive done the math and they will pay for them selves in about 4 months on the dairy. as our electric bill is already about $7000-$10000 a month
Home depot has a 24" led for $199 that is spec'd at 12000 lumens. Probably can't run it over it with a truck though.
Next problem when they start to burn out, will the company still be around and will they still make parts for this light, technology is growing so fast I can't keep up with flash lights, Witch makes it hard to spend the money because in a few months something better is going to come out???That would be my concern as well. They do look very well built for the money, and one of the features offered is the different lenses for light distribution. But I think 5 alone without perfect reflection (white walls/ceiling/floor) would create shadows.
I work in a big Aircraft Hanger we just replaced the old mercury lights with the transformers (the hum drove us nuts) they put in about 300 to 500 lights wow what a difference went from yellow lights to white. The said we could buy them for about $600 each. the company spent about 500k and pay back is about 16 months money well spent.
I'm surprised by the need for the aluminum housing to dissipate heat - I thought one of the big selling points of LED lights was their distinct lack of heat?