To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

GearWrench SAE wrenches, China vs Taiwan

hangfirew8

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
879
Location
Central Maryland
I bought two sets of Taiwan GearWrench at Sears this past weekend, something I haven't seen there in years- including when I bought my China made sets a few years ago, under the impression they were from Taiwan, until I got them home and read the BACK of the package. This time, for $15 and $16 I could hardly turn them down.

I always felt a little burned by that first transaction, so with both SAE sets in hand (Chinese set is 10 wrenches, Taiwanese 8 wrenches), I sat down Monday evening with my trusty old dial caliper and started measuring. I didn't bother to weigh, as the slightly differing lengths throws off any comparison, but the lengths are close enough that there's no functional difference.

Widths and thicknesses of wrench ends, well, that's different. Small differences means "fits" versus "lobster claw" and I thought I knew how that would turn out. I guessed wrong.

My 3 or 4 year old China wrenches are marked "PAT" and with an "o" with lines running straight up and to the right from the "o". My new closeout Taiwan wrenches are marked "L-" (Capital L Minus). These are both non-reversing non-flex wrenches with no serrated edge to mark rotation direction. My Metric China wrenches are flex, so there wasn't much point comparing non-flex to flex Metrics.

For any budding metrologists, please don't object to the number of significant digits. Round up or ignore it, but I put it there because it is useful for comparison, as opposed to QA acceptance accuracy.

Spreadsheet format:
7yo9boC.png


Code:
GearWrench 	Comparison	                |						
	Chinese SAE		PAT		o-		Taiwan		L-		
Wrench	C Open	COThick	C Box	CBThick	Length	Wrench	T Open	TOThick	T Box	TBThick	Length
0 ¼	0.492		0.673		4.985	0 ¼					
  5/16	0.676	0.200	0.681	0.258	5.535	  5/16	0.716	0.212	0.754	0.276	5.598
 11/32	0.753		0.720		5.945	 11/32					
  3/ 8	0.830	0.221	0.820	0.292		  3/ 8	0.883	0.232	0.855	0.307	
  7/16	0.898	0.247	0.899	0.303		  7/16	0.910	0.324	1.001	0.265	
0 ½	1.080	0.261	1.000	0.345		0 ½	1.127	0.294	1.070	0.341	
  9/16	1.159	0.287	1.091	0.355		  9/16	1.267	0.294	1.095	0.375	
  5/ 8	1.328	0.290	1.210	0.392		  5/ 8	1.370	0.360	1.275	0.409	
 11/16	1.384	0.317	1.240	0.410		 11/16	1.475	0.363	1.361	0.423	
0 ¾	1.548	0.340	1.430	0.444		0 ¾	1.656	0.384	1.428	0.442

My haul:
 
Last edited:
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

bmwpowere36m3

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
1,125
Hard to read whatever measurements you posted. What I found interesting during my last Sears visit. The SAE sets were still Taiwan and Metric were all China… guess metric sell better and the SAE are old stock.
 
OP
H

hangfirew8

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
879
Location
Central Maryland
Sorry, I took the time to make a bunch of spacing corrections after pasting, and the data and headers line up perfectly in my Firefox on Linux.

Short version- the Taiwan wrenches are more the Lobster-claw than the Chinese.

EDIT: On mobile that that table is a train wreck. Try a PC or Mac.
EDIT2: FF had trouble, so I reshot Chris's spreadsheet and linked that... hope it works now.
 
Last edited:

bmwpowere36m3

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
1,125
That's interesting, because the smaller metric ones (China) at Sears were loberclaw-ish… Whereas the SAE Taiwan set looked overall alright.

Are the open and box-ends of the Chinese one thicker… I was consider GW, since our old set was really nice. However all I see now are China COO and they appear to be thicker than the old ones I had.
 
OP
H

hangfirew8

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
879
Location
Central Maryland
For my 2 SAE sets, most of the China versions are trivially thinner at the box end, I'm talking .015" or less. One wrench, I think the 1/2, was a few thou thinner on the Taiwan side.

Neither set are what I would call Lobster Claws. I've seen much, much worse in the Craftsman aisle.

Since tooling wears and gets changed out, perhaps someone comparing another 2 sets will get different results.

I'm not suddenly keen on Brand China, and I have no ability to reliably test metallurgy... but I will be keeping the China made wrenches, not selling them on ebay as originally planned. The Taiwan set will go to my road box.

-HF
 

jallyn

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
448
Location
Fort Wayne, Indiana
I did the same kind of measuring to compare and contrast metric reversible ratcheting wrenches... Craftsman(China) vs DeWalt(Taiwan). I will save you from the tedium of every measurement and just present the averages and my assessment:

Craftsman is 28% heavier than DeWalt while being 5% shorter in overall length.
Craftsman is 16% bulkier in every other dimension with the real kicker:
Craftsman is 37% thicker from the corner of the fastener to the end of the ratcheting/box end.

So DeWalt is the hands-down winner in every category, especially accessibility in hard to reach places which is the main reason for ratcheting wrenches.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

WhataTool

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2015
Messages
472
We mention "wrenches" but I'm going to assume based on the box end sizes there are ratcheting wrenches?
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom