pattenp
Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by pattenp
Has anyone used copper with compression fittings (No sweating joints) for air lines? I was thinking about putting in copper airline and using the compression type connectors. I know the sweat connectors are cheaper but I too hate sweating connections. Was wondering what the downside may be of using compression fittings.
Oh and I apologize, I should has started another post instead of hijacking this one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by back2class
This is the WORST idea I have herd all day! Definately NOT!
I wanted to take this to a new thread because I originally posted in the PVC Air Line post and got the above response. So why would this be a bad idea. The Garage-Pak product uses a mechanical connection with an O-ring. I would think using compression fittings on copper would be just as good as the type of fitting as used in the Garage-Pak product. Has anyone done this? Of course seeing the response I got, you may not want to admit to it.
Originally Posted by pattenp
Has anyone used copper with compression fittings (No sweating joints) for air lines? I was thinking about putting in copper airline and using the compression type connectors. I know the sweat connectors are cheaper but I too hate sweating connections. Was wondering what the downside may be of using compression fittings.
Oh and I apologize, I should has started another post instead of hijacking this one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by back2class
This is the WORST idea I have herd all day! Definately NOT!
I wanted to take this to a new thread because I originally posted in the PVC Air Line post and got the above response. So why would this be a bad idea. The Garage-Pak product uses a mechanical connection with an O-ring. I would think using compression fittings on copper would be just as good as the type of fitting as used in the Garage-Pak product. Has anyone done this? Of course seeing the response I got, you may not want to admit to it.
Last edited:

