Private Lugnutz
Well-known member
Care of four.cycle, I have this partial Walden-Worcester midget socket set, posted previously on the midget thread. (See Pics 1, 2, & 3).
Based on the construction and markings, and in comparison to very well-known Walden-Worcester wartime production, it is prewar. It is 9/32-inch square drive. I don't have to point out that it's in an OD green box. But the most interesting aspect might be the contents and configuration. The contents are an identical match to the wartime NAF 1108-1 sets (Phila. Mfg Co., Plomb, etc) that several GJ members own. From the number of tools, to the types of tools, right down to the sizes of the sockets (the number of points in the broachings has some variance), it appears to be an earlier version of the same exact set. Even the practice of neatly labeling everything on the lid of the box smacks of NAF.
See Pic 4 for a photo of my Phila Mfg Set as a reminder, with the labels in Pic 5 & 6 for comparison. Even though the actual part numbers are different, the part numbering scheme or pattern is the same.
Based on the construction and markings, and in comparison to very well-known Walden-Worcester wartime production, it is prewar. It is 9/32-inch square drive. I don't have to point out that it's in an OD green box. But the most interesting aspect might be the contents and configuration. The contents are an identical match to the wartime NAF 1108-1 sets (Phila. Mfg Co., Plomb, etc) that several GJ members own. From the number of tools, to the types of tools, right down to the sizes of the sockets (the number of points in the broachings has some variance), it appears to be an earlier version of the same exact set. Even the practice of neatly labeling everything on the lid of the box smacks of NAF.
See Pic 4 for a photo of my Phila Mfg Set as a reminder, with the labels in Pic 5 & 6 for comparison. Even though the actual part numbers are different, the part numbering scheme or pattern is the same.
Attachments
Last edited:




















