Ok, so I called and talked at length with Snap on and Leatherman, both companies I recently purchased significant amounts from (considering my small time status as a hobby wrencher).. Anyway..
It seems that there is a California law on the books that has been upheld in court in a challenge as it relates to labeling items "Made in USA".. The law requires that 100% of the items, and material be of US origin. This is (as we all know, nearly impossible).. Companies like Fender Guitar (which I have two ) make a guitar 100% in the US, using US made screws, wire and most of the woods, but if they source the rosewood neck wood from Brazil or Africa, it's technically not legal to mark it "made in USA"
This is Dumb.. (pardon the simple term)..
I am the first to defend that we need to make more here, and certainly a lot less in China.. but for Leatherman to source a two items from Switzerland and Austria, and finish the Pliers in Mexico, but be unable to put down "Made in USA" on their tools, when 80%+ of the time invested in making it is US, is a bit much... The law should be amended to be 75% or even less... so long as the "majority" of labor is US, that should be good.. Just require that the rest of the content also be listed.. I.E. Made in USA, of 90% US, 5% Swiss, and 3% Mexico and 2% Austrian parts/labor. This kind of information is readily available for all items a company makes as a part of their "Cost accounting" procedures and would cost them next to nothing to print on a box.
My Snap on CT6850 and CDR6850 (both power tools) are also similarly not marked Made in USA for the same reason, as are my openend/ratcheting SOEX and 80 tooth ratchets.. Even though the majority of the tool, and it's assembly is of US origin, the fraction that is not is the cause of the lack of a USA label..
What do you all think? Am I being overly naive in thinking that it's a bit too much?
I personally don't care if there is some EU or Japan content to a tool, it's the China and Mexico that I get a bit upset about, and if it's disclosed as a small %, I am ok with still marking the tool USA.
Discuss..
It seems that there is a California law on the books that has been upheld in court in a challenge as it relates to labeling items "Made in USA".. The law requires that 100% of the items, and material be of US origin. This is (as we all know, nearly impossible).. Companies like Fender Guitar (which I have two ) make a guitar 100% in the US, using US made screws, wire and most of the woods, but if they source the rosewood neck wood from Brazil or Africa, it's technically not legal to mark it "made in USA"
This is Dumb.. (pardon the simple term)..

I am the first to defend that we need to make more here, and certainly a lot less in China.. but for Leatherman to source a two items from Switzerland and Austria, and finish the Pliers in Mexico, but be unable to put down "Made in USA" on their tools, when 80%+ of the time invested in making it is US, is a bit much... The law should be amended to be 75% or even less... so long as the "majority" of labor is US, that should be good.. Just require that the rest of the content also be listed.. I.E. Made in USA, of 90% US, 5% Swiss, and 3% Mexico and 2% Austrian parts/labor. This kind of information is readily available for all items a company makes as a part of their "Cost accounting" procedures and would cost them next to nothing to print on a box.
My Snap on CT6850 and CDR6850 (both power tools) are also similarly not marked Made in USA for the same reason, as are my openend/ratcheting SOEX and 80 tooth ratchets.. Even though the majority of the tool, and it's assembly is of US origin, the fraction that is not is the cause of the lack of a USA label..
What do you all think? Am I being overly naive in thinking that it's a bit too much?
I personally don't care if there is some EU or Japan content to a tool, it's the China and Mexico that I get a bit upset about, and if it's disclosed as a small %, I am ok with still marking the tool USA.
Discuss..
Last edited:




