I didn't see that on their website, nor did I see anything there about the fluid issue. I also didn't see any mention of a 3rd party saftey endorsmentThose are only intended to be used on ground up type restorations, nothing else.
I didn't see that on their website, nor did I see anything there about the fluid issue. I also didn't see any mention of a 3rd party saftey endorsment![]()
Personally, I feel that there is something wrong with supporting a vehicle by 2 wheels (or where the wheels should be) instead of the designed 4. I'd also like to see a unibody car after being lifted with that.
per website FAQ...
"What fluids do you drain? Depends on the vehicle. You need to worry about gas, oil, transmission fluid, and battery. I usually drain oil. With newer vehicles, the gas system is sealed, so you don't have to worry. Older cars, either tilt with side fill tube up, or rear fill with gas tank at least half empty. Otherwise, you need to drain the oil. With Auto transmissions, I just tape the fill tube if it's down."
I didn't see that![]()
Did you notice anything on the site about meeting OSHA/ANSI or some other safety council criteria?
Most quailty companies have their product tested by an independent agency to "assure" that the meet "standards" set by somebody. Usually known as 3rd party review. Granted those standards could be set low but neverless a lifting device must have a rated capacity to know you are in a safe operating range.Not that I found...
Would there be any standards for such a specialized products.
I didn't see that![]()
Did you notice anything on the site about meeting OSHA/ANSI or some other safety council criteria?
Thanks for the info!There are no standards that OSHA has that cover a setup like that. We have many of the ANSI standards at work, however I do not recall ever seeing a standard for that type of apparatus; that is not to say such a standard does not exist. We do not have every single one, just a good many. If OSHA found one of those in use at a body shop or the like, I am sure they would first check ANSI, in the absence of an applicable standard, their only option would be to rely on the manufacturers data. The manufacturers data would be incorporated by reference, and backed up by the General Duty Clause in the event citations were issued. Assuming that the fixture has data from a manufacturer,engineered plans to back it up, and being used as the manufacturer intended; OSHA would really have no ground for issuing citations. Many people would be suprised at how often things like company safety manuals, or standards from virtually any acknowledged rulemaking entity are applied along with the General Duty Clause to issue citations.
I'm glad they mention that on their website.
My offroad rig has been on either it's side or roof 9 TIMES. Trust me. Fluids leak from places you'd never think of. Battery acid all over the engine bay, and gear oil running from all three shifters into the interior - there's two quick examples.
If you left a normal vehicle on that apparatus for more than a couple of minutes, you would have to pull the plugs and crank it to ensure you didn't hydro-lock it. Cylinders fill with oil remarkably fast.![]()
Agreed. I am completely speechless, in an OSHA sort of way.HOLY PUCKERED ********! Good luck with that thing.
I can't see a reason to ever use such a rickety looking contraption ... total resto or otherwise.
A guy can build him self a NICE rotisserie for what this piece of junk costs.