I have a new old box of 12/2-NM that has been in my shop for years. Is it OK to use it today? I see that the cable sold now is 12/2-NM-B. I am not concerned about the age, it is in the box and not damaged, but not sure if it up to code.
Since even brand new NM cable with THHN conductors is limited to the 60 deg C column, and further choked in ampacity by 240.4(D), I see absolutely no reason not to use it.
As long as (like pattenp said) the ground is the same size as the other conductors.
You CANNOT be serious.I don't understand why people think NM-B cable has THHN conductors. If you've ever had both next to each other, they are definantly NOT the same.

You CANNOT be serious.
It is not labeled as such, but it is the same conductor.
http://www.wesbellwireandcable.com/Romex/Romex_Wire_Information.html
http://www.cerrowire.com/nmb
Whatever gooch. I really don't feel the need to argue this with you. It's the same stuff and that's all that matters.first link is a joke.
second link lists nothing about using THHN wire.
Wow. I hadn't looked at that section in years. I never knew of the 90 deg C requirement.I say the NM cable is scrap metal, see NEC art 334.112 , the color of the outer sheath is not a code requirement, but the fact they are not 90 degree C rated is a deal killer.
334.112 Insulation. The insulated power conductors shall
be one of the types listed in Table 310.13(A) that are suitable
for branch-circuit wiring or one that is identified for
use in these cables. Conductor insulation shall be rated at
90°C (194°F).
FPN: Types NM, NMC, and NMS cable identified by the
markings NM-B, NMC-B, and NMS-B meet this
requirement.
Existing NM that is not 90 degree C is fine but NOS, New Old Stock is not & the 90 degree requirement has been in place since the 1987 NEC as 336-26.
Wow. I hadn't looked at that section in years. I never knew of the 90 deg C requirement.
Thanks.![]()