very similar by Millers Falls USA and Marples UK about 1950s? - usually red and black paint
The rounded handle ends are not common so could be at least that old-have a faint thought on where I came across something similar but can't quite grasp it.very similar by Millers Falls USA and Marples UK about 1950s? - usually red and black paint
I checked out a similar one a few months ago, that had a even worse weld seem, I'll have a look to see if it is still around, won't buy it but kinda interesting if 2 the same are welded, may buy this one thou.colmal: dannyr is correct. It does look like a Millers Falls/Marples. Goodell-Pratt is credited with developing that style.
The smaller clamp-on with patent date is a Colton patent vice. They're cool and collectible. I think some of the earlier models had H or H&B on them for Hayden & Barnes. They're even more collectible.
I like the vice that only has 2 embossed on it. I have never noticed a clamp-on with a slide like that but I think I've seen full size vices that did. It does look like it might have been repaired. The area where the side meets the base looks like a weld seam. If it wasn't too expensive I think I'd buy it anyway.
Ah, this is where i saw a similar one a few months ago, wants $50 for the 2 thou, don't mind the condition, just thought it was at least $10 too much.


Not sure on this one as the angles are bad, but may be a Colton patent vise with the June 1815 patent date.Don't have anything like this and know nothing, but I'm pretty sure someone here does
This on looks to be a welded repair of something similar to a Stanley clamp on. See if any markings on top of the slide's tail.Really **** descriptions, photos on all his vices/tools
![]()
Jaws I i/8 - not seen a curved guide area before either.![]()
ThankyouThose double rod slide vises are fairly common and were made by everyone just about as a hobby vise. Millers Falls, Goodell Pratt, and many others as well as a lot of Asian imports.
I meant to mention the "2" on the one vise - besides Stanely there were German imports very similar in the 30's
This particular vise looks like it has Parker style jaw faces. They are actually standard rectangular faces but, through the magic of masking before painting, I gave them the distinctive Parker look. Don't be fooled.

looks like it needs to be mounted near a Coke Fridge. Came up nicely.3" jaws
CHAMPION No.3
Champion Blower and Forge
Opens to 3"
16 lbs.
This is one of the few bench vise models from Champion Blower and Forge. With fancy script lettering, it's a nice addition to my Homeowners Garage Vise sub-collection. There are a few quirks though. The "corrugated base" requires a very non-standard lock down screw. The removeable pipe jaws are also not standard. They each have a raised rib on the back. Both the dynamic and the static jaws have a boss against which the pipe jaw ribs will ride. The lock down screw, the ribbed pipe jaws, and the embossed front and back jaws all required extra designing, casting, and machining - all of which cost extra time and money; all for a style of vise that was standard and common.
* This particular vise looks like it has Parker style jaw faces. They are actually standard rectangular faces but, through the magic of masking before painting, I gave them the distinctive Parker look. Don't be fooled.
How do you blend the tops of the jaws? I can see myself making a mess with the belt sander!Your paint job didn’t fool me CRS. I liked it though. Building some as I write. Added your #3 to the spreadsheet.
First I use a Mold Making skill by stepping off the radius on my Bridgeport ( I created the geometry on my cad system) then I use a 36 grit 4-1/2” sanding disc to rough it down to the steps that were cut on the mill. Finish up with a hook and loop scotch brite pads on my 4-1/2” angle grinder. Belt sanders are to un controlling in my opinion.How do you blend the tops of the jaws? I can see myself making a mess with the belt sander!


Yep, happy about that, glad I didn't stuff around with offers and risk someone else buying, I have bought from him before and he was good and did accept my offer on other items,Did some research, seems to be conflicting info on whether this is a later or earlier version- 1933 - 1982, probably a bit over priced, but how do you quantify condition ? better than anything else I've seen, original paint. Only been listed a few hours and a bit of interest in it, could get it a bit cheaper maybe. Hmmm
So I applied the one true measure, do I want it - well yes, like the handle which appears to be less common, the condition and would be a excellent little Brother to my Dawn, also an original paint example.
So I bought it
![]()
Your 4 inch Dawn with the undermount post thru mount system and cover over the rail out the back looks just like the Record 74.Yep, happy about that, glad I didn't stuff around with offers and risk someone else buying, I have bought from him before and he was good and did accept my offer on other items,
Soon as I saw he had posted, (7.30am here), felt right, that's usually my 'grouse level" for a bought items. 5 and and half hours to find, research, pay and get posted- (couldn't sleep)
It does , would have to be a copy, Dawn started making them in 1960's even came with plastic jaw covers and the cylinder holding plug.Your 4 inch Dawn with the undermount post thru mount system and cover over the rail out the back looks just like the Record 74.

The plug is a perfect fit for the smooth pipe jaws and just fits on and protrudes out of the non-offset side- now that makes sense-just took me a year to think of it.It does , would have to be a copy, Dawn started making them in 1960's even came with plastic jaw covers and the cylinder holding plug.
It is more of a big Brother than I thought.
Thankyou very much, I may be able to find out how the holding plug works now via Record- vague thoughts that it screws into head and held in vice - doesn't seem quite right thou.![]()
Ah and just clicked, was trying to find when the style/mounting changed- don't think it did, you have a 75 pictured (5 1/4" jaws, 48 lbs), where the Dawn copies a 74 (4' jaws, 26 lbs) different mounting.Your 4 inch Dawn with the undermount post thru mount system and cover over the rail out the back looks just like the Record 74.
I just bought a 5 locally, they are out there cheap. Wonderful well built vise, up there with athol, hollands, reed, wilton, etc imho. Smooth and tight vise. Handles and jaws available reasonable from england too..this is it after jaws,, handle, repaint and big time clean.Anyone know how I can get ahold of a Paramo no. 6 vise?
I missed out on one at an estate sale a while back, and it's bugged me ever since then. I'm not a vise expert, but I get my heart set on certain hard-to-find models of things sometimes, and can't let go.
Doesn't need to be an expensive pristine specimen, but I want one.

Depending on your price point, they're certainly out there. https://www.ebay.com/itm/124946194263Anyone know how I can get ahold of a Paramo no. 6 vise?
I missed out on one at an estate sale a while back, and it's bugged me ever since then. I'm not a vise expert, but I get my heart set on certain hard-to-find models of things sometimes, and can't let go.
Doesn't need to be an expensive pristine specimen, but I want one.
Just in case you didn’t know, there are other brands that are identical to the one you’re looking for. It might broaden your search. This Dawn vise is the same thing out of Australia. I think some Records and Rae vises are the same as well. There’s a lot of info on this site about the variants.Anyone know how I can get ahold of a Paramo no. 6 vise?
I missed out on one at an estate sale a while back, and it's bugged me ever since then. I'm not a vise expert, but I get my heart set on certain hard-to-find models of things sometimes, and can't let go.
Doesn't need to be an expensive pristine specimen, but I want one.

Colmal - Sorry, I clicked on the wrong catalog page. Yes, mine was the 75. I see you posted the 74 from 1935.Ah and just clicked, was trying to find when the style/mounting changed- don't think it did, you have a 75 pictured (5 1/4" jaws, 48 lbs), where the Dawn copies a 74 (4' jaws, 26 lbs) different mounting.
All good, made me search a bit more and found some good stuff, Wouldn't mind finding a 74 and 75 now eitherColmal - Sorry, I clicked on the wrong catalog page. Yes, mine was the 75. I see you posted the 74 from 1935.



I don't like them enough to buy a damaged one, and not at the high price this one is selling for. (LOL- uh, cheaper than the Imp, but there was a severe case of FOMO going on with the Imp, and didn't mind paying overs for it.)