To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

What's going on with R410A?

jar944

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
5,918
Location
Northern VA
I said that

But energy release vs time duration is key. Propane burning will never be close to the detonation velocity achieved in a actual detonation. Yes a bunch of Propane in a confined space with ignion is bad, it's not close to a detonation though. Making the energy comparison irrelevant between the two
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

jar944

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
5,918
Location
Northern VA

Sure if you pump enough NG or propane into a enclosed space inside a house and ignite it it will knock the structure down and fling parts around thr neighborhood.

That wasn't a pound of propane. It was tens more likely hundreds of pounds. At 20x the energy content of cartoon "dynamite" per pound that would be hundreds to thousands of pounds of HE if both had the same time duration of detonation (remember propane doesn't detonate, it burns)

Hundreds to thousands of pounds of HE would level that house, the neighbors houses and crater the spot, so no again its not a apt comparison.
 

The Metric System

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 28, 2025
Messages
268
Can no one ask why
Sure you can ask, but it's been answered already. The energy content of a flammable material is not a reliable indicator of how hazardous it is.

A pound of wood has ~10 megajoules of energy in it. Nobody worries about a log blowing their house up; and rightly so.
 

American Locomotive

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
10,957
Location
Rhode Island
How often do refrigeration or air conditioning systems have a catastrophic loss of charge event where they dump their whole charge all at once? Even if a system did have a leak indoors, we're talking like grams of refrigerant a day...
 

pcmeiners

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
7,904
Location
In the only town in Pennsylvania, Bloomsburg.
But energy release vs time duration is key. Propane burning will never be close to the detonation velocity achieved in a actual detonation. Yes a bunch of Propane in a confined space with ignion is bad, it's not close to a detonation though
So what is the talk about the difference between "burning" or detonation, who gives a damn if one substance is faster than another if a home/building is scattered all over a neighborhood, it is irrelevant. If your in a war. mining or demolition, then it is pertinent. Have you ever been in a building when natural gas decides to "burn"?, I have, it is faster than your senses can handle if your near the ignition source, propane will have the same effect.
 
Last edited:

PoorUB

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 29, 2021
Messages
11,635
Location
Fargo, ND
When I worked for a HVAC wholesaler we found our that a customer had blown up a mechanical room.
Later on we found out he was working on a system and grabbed a certain color jug of refrigerant. Instead of R22 or R410, (i forget the specific refrigerant) it was some propane blend. Somehow he released a bunch in a small room and lit his torch, boom!

Thr back wall of the building was pushed out and ready to collapse and he barely survived. I don't know if he ever went back to work again. He was retirement age, so maybe it was time.
 

IndyGarage

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
9,693
Location
Indy
Propane was one of the original refrigerants, but was deemed too dangerous to put in millions of homes. So Charles Kettering had his team at GM invent Freon, which was not explosive, but not as good.

R410A is not as good as the freon it replaced, so i think it's funny that folks are circling back to propane.
 

jar944

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
5,918
Location
Northern VA
Have you ever been in a building when natural gas decides to "burn"?

Nope, but I've been around a lot of HE and LE when it detonated or burned. I'll take a pound of loose propane in my house over a pound of (spark sensitive) HE every time.

The topic was propane as a refrigerant in a closed system, not, if you fill your basement with 10s of pounds propane vapor is it problematic.
 
Last edited:

Snapped-off

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
4,783
Location
Indiana
Propane was one of the original refrigerants, but was deemed too dangerous to put in millions of homes. So Charles Kettering had his team at GM invent Freon, which was not explosive, but not as good.

R410A is not as good as the freon it replaced, so i think it's funny that folks are circling back to propane.
What if the Freon is R-410A?
RDT_20240629_1819469086061112148777218.jpg
 

Snapped-off

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
4,783
Location
Indiana
I think Freon is a brand name like Kleenex, so they can put it on anything. Honestly I don't think it has anything to do with the environment. They got everyone to buy new equipment with 410A and they are going to try to do that again.
It's Dupont's tradename. Comes in multiple scents.
 

bonneyman

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
8,795
Location
Desert SW
When I worked for a HVAC wholesaler we found our that a customer had blown up a mechanical room.
Later on we found out he was working on a system and grabbed a certain color jug of refrigerant. Instead of R22 or R410, (i forget the specific refrigerant) it was some propane blend. Somehow he released a bunch in a small room and lit his torch, boom!

Thr back wall of the building was pushed out and ready to collapse and he barely survived. I don't know if he ever went back to work again. He was retirement age, so maybe it was time.
Most, if not all, of the R22 replacement "blends" had various miscibility problems with refrigerant oil. So they added propane or isobutane for oil return issues. That way you could remove the R22, evacuate the system, and add the blend without having to deal with flushing and compatibility issues. Made the blends what they called more of a "drop-in" replacement. That sounded great, but there was the latent burning potential. And most of them had capacity fall-offs.

I think Freon is a brand name like Kleenex, so they can put it on anything. Honestly I don't think it has anything to do with the environment. They got everyone to buy new equipment with 410A and they are going to try to do that again.
I agree. It's all about money.
 

danski0224

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
13,414
Location
Near Naperville, IL
Honestly I don't think it has anything to do with the environment.
Patents and money.

One of the most popular refrigerant reclaiming machines, the Appion G5 Twin, does not have a purge function. The manufacturer claims that it falls under a "de minimus" release. There is a not so insignificant amount of refrigerant that is trapped in the machine and hoses during a recovery procedure that gets vented into the atmosphere, every time one of these is used, all over the world.

And rest assured, there is still plenty of outright refrigerant venting that is happening.
 

pcmeiners

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
7,904
Location
In the only town in Pennsylvania, Bloomsburg.
Propane was one of the original refrigerants, but was deemed too dangerous to put in millions of homes. So Charles Kettering had his team at GM invent Freon, which was not explosive, but not as good.
Too dangerous....
Before the 1960s, ammonia and sulfur dioxide (both can kill), were commonly used for refrigerant in refrigerators/freezers and other domestic devices, and still is but much less.

Honestly I don't think it has anything to do with the environment.
Patents, lobbyists and money. :thumbup:



"And rest assured, there is still plenty of outright refrigerant venting that is happening."

And legally allowed high leak rates in low pressure industrial HVAC.
 
Last edited:
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

PoorUB

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 29, 2021
Messages
11,635
Location
Fargo, ND
Most, if not all, of the R22 replacement "blends" had various miscibility problems with refrigerant oil. So they added propane or isobutane for oil return issues. That way you could remove the R22, evacuate the system, and add the blend without having to deal with flushing and compatibility issues. Made the blends what they called more of a "drop-in" replacement. That sounded great, but there was the latent burning potential. And most of them had capacity fall-offs.


I agree. It's all about money.
It wasn't a blend he mixed up. It was something that was 100% propane, or isobutane, I forget what was as it was about ten years ago. Jug color was very close to what he intended to use. He just grabbed the wrong jug, and it ended up badly.
 

bonneyman

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
8,795
Location
Desert SW
It wasn't a blend he mixed up. It was something that was 100% propane, or isobutane, I forget what was as it was about ten years ago. Jug color was very close to what he intended to use. He just grabbed the wrong jug, and it ended up badly.
Oh, I see.

There's so many refrigerants now they've run out of colors for the cans. I've seen alot of cans thinking they were one gas and then read the label and it was something else. Maybe they should start painting them with metallic colors? :LOL:
 

The Metric System

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 28, 2025
Messages
268
There's so many refrigerants now they've run out of colors for the cans. I've seen alot of cans thinking they were one gas and then read the label and it was something else. Maybe they should start painting them with metallic colors?
It's going to be a gradual transition as old stock is consumed, but since 2020 the standards have been updated to where all refrigerant bottles will be painted a uniform gray/green color and the printed text on the bottle will be the sole means of identification.

This is because as the number of refrigerants expanded the colors became close enough to be easily confused, especially if a cylinder was faded or dirty.

Makes sense, it's better to have no color coding than color coding that contributes to confusion or errors.

 

Aileron

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2019
Messages
462
Location
outside
It's going to be a gradual transition as old stock is consumed, but since 2020 the standards have been updated to where all refrigerant bottles will be painted a uniform gray/green color and the printed text on the bottle will be the sole means of identification.

This is because as the number of refrigerants expanded the colors became close enough to be easily confused, especially if a cylinder was faded or dirty.

Makes sense, it's better to have no color coding than color coding that contributes to confusion or errors.


Then the drums scrub together riding down the road in the service truck and the numbering rubs off.
 
OP
M

MushCreek

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
9,776
Location
Upstate South Carolina
I ordered and got my jug of R410A, which should last the rest of my days and then some. $230, but $60 shipping. Locally, I'd have had to drive to Charlotte, so 4 hour round-trip and $25 in gas, so it was worth it to just pay the freight.
 

Raisedonadeere

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
436
Location
Central KY
I ordered and got my jug of R410A, which should last the rest of my days and then some. $230, but $60 shipping. Locally, I'd have had to drive to Charlotte, so 4 hour round-trip and $25 in gas, so it was worth it to just pay the freight.
9 years ago I thought I had my last jug. Now need another. Where did you order?
 

MrFreeze

Active member
Joined
Sep 10, 2020
Messages
40
Location
Seattle, WA
The guys in the refrigeration and fabrication shop where I used to work (before I started there) used R11 for degreasing their hands, and also for hydrostatic testing small pressure vessels. Dirt cheap and no need to dry out the vessels afterwards

Same company was developing an R12 immersion freezer for freezing strawberries. Early 1980s. Tank of "food grade" R12, conveyor in and out, berries get dunked in R12 and freeze instantly. Water curtains used to minimize R12 vapor loss. Equipment used to recover and recondense captured vapor. Thought they were about to revolutionize the industry until someone noticed the hole in the ozone layer. A similar process is still used with nitrogen, but there is no way to recover any of the vaporized nitrogen so it is pretty expensive and rare.

The industrial refrigeration world mainly uses ammonia and CO2 at this point. But my new home refrigerator uses R600a (iso-butane).

The world continues to change, and doesn't care how you feel about it.

MrFreeze
 

bonneyman

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
8,795
Location
Desert SW
Yes but we don't run the gas line into the plenum and hook it to a very poorly made coil that it seems is designed to leak. Which takes a full circle to why we are using flamable refrigerants in the first place. Stop making **** equipment and go back to 12,22 and 502.

Propane was one of the original refrigerants, but was deemed too dangerous to put in millions of homes. So Charles Kettering had his team at GM invent Freon, which was not explosive, but not as good.

R410A is not as good as the freon it replaced, so i think it's funny that folks are circling back to propane.
Agreed!

I'd go back to 1990 era equipment with R-22 in a heartbeat! :)
 

Ohmthis

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
3,013
Location
Outside of Louisville KY
I'm so glad I got out of HVAC when I did. I would not be able to stomach the situation that's developed.
Having to carry so many gas cylinders, plus separate manifolds and vacuum pumps and reclaim cylinders - just to minimize the risk of cross-contamination. Back then some guys had 4 gases with them (R22, R410a, R12, and R134a) - to do A/C's and refrigerators. Now - who knows? With all the generations of gases - plus all the potential blends - guys will probably have to start driving 18 wheelers to do service.:scared:
But seriously, I get what you mean. Now I have 134a, 404, r22, r410, r32, and r 454b. I use one set of digital manifold gauges that do all of them. A blast of nitrogen to purge for the next gas if needed. I only work for myself and only take on certain jobs. I’d like to weed r22, but there are still a lot of systems that I look after, including our lake house. The supply houses near me just about gave away the last of the 410 equipment last year. What really ***** is having to keep that stuff as inventory. I wish I had more space for it.
 

dcg9381

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 20, 2018
Messages
11,753
Location
Austin, TX
I looked last week and found several online sellers. Just need to check the box stating it will be installed by a cert. person. Last 25# I bought was $100. Now $369!!

Getting the 608 universal cert is not too difficult.
I was just charged about $250/lb retail through a contractor. Looks like something worth having.
When I worked for a HVAC wholesaler we found our that a customer had blown up a mechanical room.
Later on we found out he was working on a system and grabbed a certain color jug of refrigerant. Instead of R22 or R410, (i forget the specific refrigerant) it was some propane blend. Somehow he released a bunch in a small room and lit his torch, boom!
I don't like working on HVAC, this is the extreme end of the "learning curve" I'm afraid of...
Doesn't this stuff have a "smell" to it like propane? Legit question....

For a while I was using R-12 "compatible" refrigerants in the old cars. They seem to have phased this stuff out due to "flammability" but I'm holding on to it!!
 

bonneyman

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
8,795
Location
Desert SW
But seriously, I get what you mean. Now I have 134a, 404, r22, r410, r32, and r 454b. I use one set of digital manifold gauges that do all of them. A blast of nitrogen to purge for the next gas if needed. I only work for myself and only take on certain jobs. I’d like to weed r22, but there are still a lot of systems that I look after, including our lake house. The supply houses near me just about gave away the last of the 410 equipment last year. What really ***** is having to keep that stuff as inventory. I wish I had more space for it.
I had a buddy who worked for Sears about 20 years ago. He carried R-12, R-22, and R-502, as he serviced reefers, reach-ins, home and commercial A/C. He had to be ready for everything as he never knew when he came in what route the computer was going to give him and what equipment he was gonna find. (I only did high temp HVAC all day at the time so I only had R-22 in my van.) Then the HFC's hit. He had to add R-410a and R-134a to his inventory. He had to get a new set of gauges (plus a spare set!), new vacuum pump, and another reclaimer. Had to keep the two generations separate. Just imagine the documentation he had to keep, and big bright labels on the rooftops with different generations of gases going side-by-side?
I assumed when R-32 was being pushed he would have had to "triple up" his gases, but then heard that many companies just flat out refused customers who had R-22 units as they didn't want to invest in keeping it around.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom