
Fisher anvils have a tool steel face and horn that were welded in the mold to the cast iron body. Their system involved fluxing only the surfaces of the pieces that were to be welded, then pouring iron through a separate chamber in the mold, where it contacted the non-fluxed surfaces and preheated them before the anvil body was poured.Sure would like to see how they fit the hard jaws in the mold when the vise is casted. All of my Reeds had cast in jaws just like these examples you guys have shown.
I have replaced several of these cast in jaws and every time I break thru the 60 R/C I look for Copper or Nickel often used in brazing hard inserts to softer cast material. I found what looks like Copper in the 106 jaws I replaced. The Reed inserts on the R series have the round boss in the center of the jaw inserts. I’m assuming for more surface area in the casting.
How did they cast the Static and Dynamic with the finished hardened serrated jaws and then how well they align up to each other.
First I've seen that, only similar I have is a 4" Dawn workshop and a Littletown arriving in the next few days. Thankyou another rabbit hole.jopy: I located one of those journals. It looks like Australia and New Zealand used that quirky spelling of vice/vise/vyce.
colmal: This item shows a vice that might interest you - if you don't already have one.
yup Parry & Bott of Birmingham UK, also made fixed version of this and a vise like the Stanley corner vise - better known for levels and auger braces
Thankyou,yup Parry & Bott of Birmingham UK, also made fixed version of this and a vise like the Stanley corner vise - better known for levels and auger braces



A fine example of precision machinery and tough, enjoyed the way they put the Dynamic jaw in for the first time.
He certainly earned his pay that day.A fine example of precision machinery and tough, enjoyed the way they put the Dynamic jaw in for the first time.
And thankyou, been close a couple of times but fortunately never have and never will buy India made after looking at this.
Saw that, closed the ad, shook my head.
I'll bet you couldn't get your wallet out fast enough!

Or not !I'll bet you couldn't get your wallet out fast enough!![]()
I was looking for a swivel base on it, I found an inexpensive 4” vise that I may pick up soon.Or not !
If it was free or close to it, and much closer, I might have considered picking it up and seeing if any parts were still good enough for somebody to use. At $100 or even $50 I’m out.
Tough ‘ole bird.. Good hardware had a rough life.
What’s your theory about what sort of abuse caused that crater on top of the fixed jaw tower?Tough ‘ole bird.. Good hardware had a rough life.
What’s your theory about what sort of abuse caused that crater on top of the fixed jaw tower?

Hacksaws, torches, hammers.What’s your theory about what sort of abuse caused that crater on top of the fixed jaw tower?
Worthpoint pic for angle example… deductive logic would tell one to probably use one’s work-holding device apparatus in a offset manner, but perhaps there was not space available, or the thought does not occur to dig-dug(s) from the previous shop(s). Another theory often applicable, & a likely common denominator is; ‘usually/probably because the person(s) who destroyed it, didn’t own it.’ I don’t think this was done in the day, given I see the trifecta of hacksaws, hammering, & fire working as a team, to f-up that gem… *+Hammering apparent, or likely, from the missing static shelf. They all tell their story, albeit, usually leaving you with more “WTF!?..”I just showed an old timer..What’s your theory about what sort of abuse caused that crater on top of the fixed jaw tower?
Guilty as charged your honor.IMO…there’s a few dudes in here who have brought worse back from the dead…
“Cleaner her, cause you love her..”
Ole boat motto.
That threw me as well, Outlaw. However, I've seen newspaper clippings to indicate that, since Parker only sold its vise division to Union, other Parker departments continued. Not being legal expert, I'm not sure if Union would've technically been on the hook for those violations, or if Parker would be. I guess it's also possible that the DOJ just didn't have the most up-to-date information on the recent sale of the vise department to Union1961? wasn't that after the Union buyout, and possbly after they stopped making Parker branded vises?
Possibly. Here’s a couple of the newspaper clippings that I mentioned (from 1960 and 1961). The 1960 clipping refers to the Charles Parker Co as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Union Manufacturing at that time. Even though Union was technically higher up the chain of command, I don’t know that it would’ve been incorrect for the DOJ to still address the Charles Parker Co.Maybe the Parker vise operations were still labeled Parker?
Makes me wonder if Columbian ever received a similar letter, especially given that its controlling partner (Warren Tool Corp) purchased the Parker Vise Division in the early 1970s. As an accountant by trade, I’m easily fascinated by these behind-the-scenes economics.Columbian claimed to be the largest Vise manufacturer in the world