To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

The VISES of Garage Journal

To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

alex03281996

New member
Joined
Jul 24, 2025
Messages
4
Just picked up this Reed 404 1/2 off Facebook, paid $150 for it... felt like a bit of a gamble since it is missing the swivel jaw pin, swivel base w/ locking mechanism, has a crappy home made handle that is probably 4" shorter than original, and I didnt know if I could get the jaw to even swivel. The guy I bought it from didnt know much about it and had it listed for a lot more before I told him about the missing pieces. After getting this home, it looks like it sat at the bottom of a lake for the last few decades with all the junk on the interior. I was able to free the swivel jaw after beating on it for about 10 minutes with a wood block as a cushion. It has probably 5 layers of paint that will need cleaned off (including a fresh one on the slide, ugh), but it looks to be in great physical shape. I carefully cleaned off the left side and found 1129 on both the dynamic jaw and main body. Interesting date... just one month after the Great Depression began. I cant imagine production for these expensive high-end vises were very high at that time.

I bought it because I really wanted a Reed with the swivel functions for my garage and I recently found a 204 1/2 for cheap that I restored. My plan is to harvest the swivel base w/ locking mechanism from my 204 1/2 to use on the new 404 1/2 once I get it all cleaned up. I will have to make a new handle (planning on threading the ends of a 12" long, 5/8" dia rod and tapping holes in 1-1/4" balls I got off McMaster) and tapered pin but that shouldn't be too hard. Is it taboo to harvest from my 204 1/2 ?? Dates are only 6 months apart, so I dont think there will be any changes to make it look awkward. 404 1_2.png
 

Andy FitzGibbon

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
173
Sure would like to see how they fit the hard jaws in the mold when the vise is casted. All of my Reeds had cast in jaws just like these examples you guys have shown.

I have replaced several of these cast in jaws and every time I break thru the 60 R/C I look for Copper or Nickel often used in brazing hard inserts to softer cast material. I found what looks like Copper in the 106 jaws I replaced. The Reed inserts on the R series have the round boss in the center of the jaw inserts. I’m assuming for more surface area in the casting.

How did they cast the Static and Dynamic with the finished hardened serrated jaws and then how well they align up to each other.
Fisher anvils have a tool steel face and horn that were welded in the mold to the cast iron body. Their system involved fluxing only the surfaces of the pieces that were to be welded, then pouring iron through a separate chamber in the mold, where it contacted the non-fluxed surfaces and preheated them before the anvil body was poured.

Reed jaws have so much less mass that I expect they just put them in the mold cold, or maybe preheated them in an oven.
 

colmal

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
454
Location
Australia
jopy: I located one of those journals. It looks like Australia and New Zealand used that quirky spelling of vice/vise/vyce.

colmal: This item shows a vice that might interest you - if you don't already have one.

1929 VYCE item.jpg
First I've seen that, only similar I have is a 4" Dawn workshop and a Littletown arriving in the next few days. Thankyou another rabbit hole.:)

Only time I have wished I was on Facebook or similar thou, would have hunted the Vyce down and tried to acquire it.
 
Last edited:

colmal

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
454
Location
Australia
Arrived this morning, don't know anything about other than it's got a swivel - :)

May be a 489A, Parry and botts, Made in England . 3" jaws, seems quite well made, I got it thrown in with some other stuff I bought as well why not-It has a swivel - :) I'll look into it later on today.

SAM_4883.JPG
 

Attachments

  • SAM_4881.JPG
    SAM_4881.JPG
    449.3 KB · Views: 7
  • SAM_4882.JPG
    SAM_4882.JPG
    480.3 KB · Views: 6
  • SAM_4884.JPG
    SAM_4884.JPG
    465.8 KB · Views: 4

dannyr

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Messages
283
Location
Sheffield England
Arrived this morning, don't know anything about other than it's got a swivel - :)

May be a 489A, Parry and botts, Made in England . 3" jaws, seems quite well made, I got it thrown in with some other stuff I bought as well why not-It has a swivel - :) I'll look into it later on today.

SAM_4883.JPG
yup Parry & Bott of Birmingham UK, also made fixed version of this and a vise like the Stanley corner vise - better known for levels and auger braces
 

colmal

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
454
Location
Australia
yup Parry & Bott of Birmingham UK, also made fixed version of this and a vise like the Stanley corner vise - better known for levels and auger braces
Thankyou,

This is about as deep into the rabbit hole as I am going, but will look out when I peruse any tool catalogues.

There was a mention elsewhere that Fry's may have owned P & B

1756371924219.png


Makes sense to me, I'm assuming the P & B is pre 1971, cause I can see where the Rabone Chesterman got it's inspiration.

1756372616409.png1756372662525.png
 

colmal

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
454
Location
Australia
Just happened to check a browser before I shut down for the night.
no words

akasrick
A fine example of precision machinery and tough, enjoyed the way they put the Dynamic jaw in for the first time.

And thankyou, been close a couple of times but fortunately never have and never will buy India made after looking at this.
 

akasrick

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 10, 2017
Messages
795
Location
south jersey
A fine example of precision machinery and tough, enjoyed the way they put the Dynamic jaw in for the first time.

And thankyou, been close a couple of times but fortunately never have and never will buy India made after looking at this.
He certainly earned his pay that day.

akasrick
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,221
Location
SF Bay Area
Or not !

If it was free or close to it, and much closer, I might have considered picking it up and seeing if any parts were still good enough for somebody to use. At $100 or even $50 I’m out.
I was looking for a swivel base on it, I found an inexpensive 4” vise that I may pick up soon.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

TheRealZeus

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Messages
5,012
Location
CONTINENTAL USA
What’s your theory about what sort of abuse caused that crater on top of the fixed jaw tower?
Hacksaws, torches, hammers.
IMG_6463.jpegWorthpoint pic for angle example… deductive logic would tell one to probably use one’s work-holding device apparatus in a offset manner, but perhaps there was not space available, or the thought does not occur to dig-dug(s) from the previous shop(s). Another theory often applicable, & a likely common denominator is; ‘usually/probably because the person(s) who destroyed it, didn’t own it.’ I don’t think this was done in the day, given I see the trifecta of hacksaws, hammering, & fire working as a team, to f-up that gem… *+Hammering apparent, or likely, from the missing static shelf. They all tell their story, albeit, usually leaving you with more “WTF!?..”
 

TheRealZeus

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Messages
5,012
Location
CONTINENTAL USA
Pretty sure it’d be a little bit more scorched.. what you do got is a sweet looking handle, which means worth looking at the screw & the nut for salvage in another vise, maybe an endcap… part horse, or a beater for rage-work.
 

Shiftless

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
14,554
Location
East Bay SFO
IMO… 👌 there’s a few dudes in here who have brought worse back from the dead…

“Cleaner her, cause you love her..”
Ole boat motto.
Guilty as charged your honor.

This Columbian Craftsman got attacked by a grinding wheel so the previous owner let me have it for a song. I stripped it down to bare metal, primed and Filled the Grand Canyon sized gouge with epoxy putty and then primed again and painted it to match one of the 2 tone combos offered on a new 1957 Chevrolet Bel Aire. The style line on these vises reminds me of tail fins from back in the day.
 

Attachments

  • E5222D0E-20E0-4E8C-9507-AE9DBC220191.jpeg
    E5222D0E-20E0-4E8C-9507-AE9DBC220191.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 9
  • 6C525378-2F29-4DF5-8A48-DB3688D0770E.jpeg
    6C525378-2F29-4DF5-8A48-DB3688D0770E.jpeg
    708.2 KB · Views: 6
  • A21E2C18-48E1-44C9-AC32-EE1604B00707.jpeg
    A21E2C18-48E1-44C9-AC32-EE1604B00707.jpeg
    658.6 KB · Views: 9
  • 68E82162-3262-4DB6-9010-8605A0F43FB5.jpeg
    68E82162-3262-4DB6-9010-8605A0F43FB5.jpeg
    477.9 KB · Views: 7
  • 0FE86D25-1680-41CF-8267-26570574C16C.jpeg
    0FE86D25-1680-41CF-8267-26570574C16C.jpeg
    632 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:

micahd1997

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2022
Messages
254
For any fellow Parker vise enthusiasts out there:

I've recently been working with the Meriden Historical Society to locate and scan any documents that they have on hand relating to the Charles Parker Company. Among those documents (all of which will eventually be publicized) is this very interesting letter written by the Department of Justice with a request for the Charles Parker Co. to cooperate with an ongoing investigation into the company regarding "alleged violations of the federal antitrust laws with respect to the industrial vise industry". There isn't any accompanying detail to explain how exactly the Charles Parker Co. had violated the antitrust laws (which deal with the illegalization of monopolies in various industries), but hopefully these details surface.
 

Attachments

  • 1756823218432.png
    1756823218432.png
    621.7 KB · Views: 9

micahd1997

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2022
Messages
254
1961? wasn't that after the Union buyout, and possbly after they stopped making Parker branded vises?
That threw me as well, Outlaw. However, I've seen newspaper clippings to indicate that, since Parker only sold its vise division to Union, other Parker departments continued. Not being legal expert, I'm not sure if Union would've technically been on the hook for those violations, or if Parker would be. I guess it's also possible that the DOJ just didn't have the most up-to-date information on the recent sale of the vise department to Union
 

Outlawmws

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
39,296
Location
The Badlands
Union would have been on the hook. - Maybe the Parker vise operations were still labeled Parker?

Columbian would also be in the picture as at one point Columbian claimed to be the largest Vise manufacturer in the world?
 

micahd1997

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2022
Messages
254
Maybe the Parker vise operations were still labeled Parker?
Possibly. Here’s a couple of the newspaper clippings that I mentioned (from 1960 and 1961). The 1960 clipping refers to the Charles Parker Co as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Union Manufacturing at that time. Even though Union was technically higher up the chain of command, I don’t know that it would’ve been incorrect for the DOJ to still address the Charles Parker Co.

Columbian claimed to be the largest Vise manufacturer in the world
Makes me wonder if Columbian ever received a similar letter, especially given that its controlling partner (Warren Tool Corp) purchased the Parker Vise Division in the early 1970s. As an accountant by trade, I’m easily fascinated by these behind-the-scenes economics.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4341.jpeg
    IMG_4341.jpeg
    679.7 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_4342.jpeg
    IMG_4342.jpeg
    784.6 KB · Views: 3
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom