)I thought in that socket comparison thread someone did, the wear marks on the nuts from 12 and 6-pt fasteners looked pretty much the same. Am I thinking incorrectly?
That's what I thought too.
If the contact patch is the same on a hex head bolt with a 6pt pr 12pt socket why is the 12pt more likely to round the nut?
Is it because the 6pt socket flats match up to the bolt head and therefor there's no room for the socket to jump over the flat edge? Unlike the 12pt?
I have both types and use both types.
12pt has less contact area than 6pt (the area in which the socket contact the bolt), so it will round off the bolt much easier than 6 pt.
I looked at this 13mm socket comparison: http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=73245
The contact patches don't look distinctly different in their size. What does stick out is the placement of the contact.
With the above documented comparison noting contact patch locations on the hex nut face, my question still stands. Why is the 12pt socket still considered more likely to round a nut compared to the 6pt socket?
Each test nut was torqued three times with the socket in a different orientation each time. This was done to give an average pattern from each socket. The test nut was then removed by loosening the nut below the washer to avoid any more imprints on the test nuts.
DavidB said:Here are the pictures of the socket's imprints on the nuts. These nuts are Class 8 and from McMaster-Carr. The part number is 90591A161. Dykem layout fluid was used. Each test nut was torqued to 27 ft-lbs using a Harbor Freight torque wrench which is the standrd dry torque of M8 bolts. The test apparatus is a bolt with several nuts on it, a washer, and the test nut. The test apparatus was held by my lovely assistant seen here.
(snip)
Each test nut was torqued three times with the socket in a different orientation each time. This was done to give an average pattern from each socket. The test nut was then removed by loosening the nut below the washer to avoid any more imprints on the test nuts.
The link only show when the socket first contact the bolt without much loading. As the load increase, the bolt goes into elastic deformation at the contact area. For 12pt, the contact (or bearing) area (and the shear area across hex edge) do not change much as the bolt deform elastically. For 6pt, the contact (or bearing) area (and the shear area across hex edge) increase as the bolt deform elastically; therefore, less stress on the bolt head.
Is there really that much deformation in something torqued generally at less than 100 ft-lbs? The explanation sounds reasonable, but I would think it would be more of an issue with an impact tool than a plain chrome socket (that isn't being used on a 6-ft breaker bar).
We've discussed it some before, but usually the overly large fasteners, in the 3/4" drive range, are generally 12-point sockets with apparently no issue. Those are likely to have far more torque applied, why would they generally choose 12-point for that application if there is that much issue with elasticity?
I didn't read the whole other thread again, but:
It doesn't say what spec they were torqued to, but if they were torqued down to a reasonable amount, wouldn't the deformation be indicated in the markings? The socket and nut would be made of different material, and flex differently.
I don't know much about materials yet to probably have much of an in-depth technical discussion (though it's something I will need to be familiar with in the future). I'm just curious.

As a hobby mechanic I encounter having to use a breaker bar far more than I have encountered a problem with rounding a nut. Therefore, in my own opinion, I definitely recommend 12 pt over 6 pt.
It all depend on the contact and shear area. If it is small enough, 100 ft-lbf will shear the hex edge off. The specified apply torque is not enough to round the hex head even with 12pt. The hex edge at the contact area will elastically deform, but not plastically deform. There is a big difference between elastic and plastic deformation. Rounding of bolt head usually happen during un-torquing. The torque to remove is sometime much much higher than the torque to install due to rust, dirt, corrosion, etc.... The torque can be high enough to cause plastic deformation by using 12pt socket. With 6pt, even with the high torque, the stress is reduced significantly so plastic deformation (rounding off) is less likely.
Nope.A 12-point will definitely be much more likely to round off the fastener because it puts more stress on the "points" and less on the flats.
Nope.
![]()
Each nut was removed with a different socket or wrench. Which do you think were removed with a 6pt and which with 12
One more PRO to 12pt is that if you work in a shop and a car comes in with wheel locks and you don't have the wheel lock key. If you own a few different size 12" sockets, if you have the right size it can be hammered over the lug nut and taken off.

As for rounding fasteners, I have no facts or theories. I simply have notice that the only times I round off bolts are when I use a cheap 12 point socket combined with having an adventure where my ratchet and socket go flying.
Nope.
![]()
Each nut was removed with a different socket or wrench. Which do you think were removed with a 6pt and which with a 12pt?
We can go with theory, and use the elastic vs. plastic deformation, or use real world results. The real world says 6 or 12 doesn't matter, unless the nut is worn, already rounded, or weakened. If the nut is in good condition but seized, either will transmit enough torque to either break it free or shear the bolt.
Keep this in mind. Whenever the 6 vs 12 argument is made, the majority says 6 point is better, except when you need more positions like with a breaker bar. Isn't it odd that they endorse using an "inferior" socket with the handle that is going to give you the most torque?
That said, I never use 6pt unless I encounter a fastener that someone else has severely damaged. Maybe a couple of times a year.
What about an expensive 12-pt socket?![]()
Your picture is pointless because it is possible to round off a fastener with either type of socket/wrench. What I said was 100% factual and true. Maybe you missed the part where I said "more likely".
It doesn't. Your statement is 100% false. You ignore multiple tests that prove they both contact the fastener on the flats the same. They will both take the corners off the hex starting at the same point. Only after the fastener has failed (rounded) will the 6 point offer any advantage. Even then, a rounded fastener is not capable of receiving it's full rated torque. If sockets and fasteners were precision machined to a perfect fit, maybe this would be different. Right now, with loose fits and advances like flank drive, most of the wall in a 6 point is not doing anything until the fastener rounds, then it has a weak wedge effect. It didn't make it less likely to round.A 12-point will definitely be much more likely to round off the fastener because it puts more stress on the "points" and less on the flats.
Agreed. A 6-point tool is designed for a 6-point fastener. A 12 point tool is designed for 6 or 12 point fasteners. If 6 point was superior for pro use, most 3/4" drive and up would all be 6 point. And why are 12 points in smaller sizes as popular as they are, considering that 12 point fasteners are much rarer than Torx?Any mechanic worth anything understands that a 6-point tool is designed for a 6-point fastener. There's really nothing else for me to say if you don't at least understand that basic fact.
I also wonder if the faster has a lot to do with rounding off.
I have no idea, but I wanna play for fun. 6,12,6,6,12,12. How'd I do? (PM would be cool, Then others could still make guesses
It doesn't. Your statement is 100% false. You ignore multiple tests that prove they both contact the fastener on the flats the same. They will both take the corners off the hex starting at the same point. Only after the fastener has failed (rounded) will the 6 point offer any advantage.
If 6 point was superior for pro use, most 3/4" drive and up would all be 6 point. And why are 12 points in smaller sizes as popular as they are, considering that 12 point fasteners are much rarer than Torx?