OK, so I have a multipart question.
I have a small Home Depot air compressor (only paid like $90 new, I think they put them on sale before they switched the color scheme):
http://www.homedepot.com/p/Husky-8-...sor-TA-2530B/202564847?N=c2fhZrd#.UZwhF5Wn4Uw
And I recently bought a cheapo HFT impact gun:
http://www.harborfreight.com/1-2-half-inch-pneumatic-impact-wrench-95310.html
Now, I know my compressor is too small to get maximum performance out of this sort of tool. However, my goal is to be able to remove lug nuts torqued at 80 ft/lb (installation will be done with a torque wrench), which isn't exactly the toughest job around.
it can be a tough job if you don't have the right tools. you should see how much someone struggles with lugnuts when all they have is a 4 way and the lugs have been rusted into place for 4-5 years
Moreover, I have read several accounts of people able to get >80 ft/lbs from this tool (or one of its differently-branded clones) from a compressor similar too (or even smaller than) mine.
you dont know if their lugnuts were torqued more or less, or is theirs stayed on longer, or they just threw them on and then took them off, or if they used a lubricant when putting them on, or antiseize. this is a generalized statement and you should be more concerned with your own application than someone else's
However, I'm currently driving the gun with 1/4" hose and quick connect fittings, and it just isn't cutting it.
who woulda thought a 1/4" hose on a 1/2" impact on a small compressor wouldn't cut it.. hell that wouldn't cut cheese if you tried.
So, question part 1: if I go ahead and buy a 1/2" hose (as the impact gun's manual recommends), is there a good chance I can remove these nuts? I do know that a smaller diameter hose has more internal friction and therefore greater pressure reduction at the outlet, and also I've heard that volume is as important for impact wrenches as is pressure, and obviously a 1/2" hose should help with that.
if you already read up on it, why don't you put that knowledge to use, or look up the basics instead of asking here, it's obvious you already looked up a few answers to your problem, and the recommended hose size isn't 1/2" anyway
Question part 2: I was looking at
HF's 1/2" hose, and I see that all the reviewers are complaining that the 1/2" hose has 3/8" couplers, thus "defeating the purpose" over a 3/8" hose. However, I observe that 1: people readily assume HF stuff is bad-review-worthy even when their own ignorance is to blame, and 2: nearly all the name-brand 3/8" hoses I see have 1/4" couplers.
So, exactly how much effect does the coupler size have on the hose performance? Why
do most larger hoses have a comparatively small coupling? I assume this does not render them pointless. Why not?
Finally, is a 3/8" coupler on a 1/2" hose reasonable?
you are asking a question as simple as pressure vs cubic feet per minute, just like volts vs amperage... pressure vs flow.... you could have a large amount of pressure, but without the flow you just aren't going to cut it. you already have all your answers and you came into this thread knowing it all, and then talking down to people's responses. i suggest you go out and do what you already know, put it to practice, then report back and let everyone know how it went. if you know a 1/4 hose doesn't allow a high enough volume of air to pass through at one time to power the impact proprely, then switch to a larger hose, probably 3/8 like alot of home compressor setups use, you shouldn't need 1/2 until you go larger unless you get a bigger compressor. at this rate with a small compressor and a 1/2 hose you can be guaranteed to run out the cfm you need to take 2 tires off.
Thanks for your time, everyone.