Rusty Musket
Well-known member
Thanks Andy & Wrenchguy! Google works so much better when you know what words to type in the little box


Oh, it's been on and working since the restoration ~ 1 year ago. I think the issue was as I tightened the set screw, the collar would 'angle' some and cause the screw to bind at a certain point of the rotation. I took it apart last night and put a fender washer between the collar and dynamic jaw surface and tightened the set screw. This allowed for enough clearance so there isn't any binding- or so it appears. I'll hold tight for now and see how it reacts. If it still causes issues, I will make a new retaining ring.
![]()
I used washers for bushings for this same reason when I used the set screw collar.


I posted this over in the general tool discussion and a member suggested that I post here also. I just joined GJ hoping to gain a little more information from some of you guys regarding my Wilton bullet vise I recently acquired. I have exhausted my research efforts and have determined that it is to the best of my knowledge an oddity. It is "Chicago" marked and also marked "Pat. Pend.", this leads me to believe that it was made in 1941. It must weigh 100 pounds.
I traded a fellow a Yost 33C for the Wilton because I have had an infatuation with these bullet vises for several years now and I finally have one. I would appreciate your comments.
The left side of the vise is marked "Wilton Tool Corp" "Chicago" and the right side is marked "Wilton Vise No 60" "Pat Pend Made in USA".
![]()
![]()
![]()
That is a very nice 1st generation 40's Wilton 1st production 6" as in as nice of condition as I have ever seen and to top it off, its Wilton's earliest swivel back. You sir have a collector's Wilton. Do not touch, use or paint it. Its that nice. I don't mean to imply that its worth a ton of money but its collectable no doubt. Thanks for adding it to this thread.
Outlaw strikes again! Well, if I'd ever seen one at a garage sale, I'd have grabbed it. First I saw was on evilBay, and it was worth $25 to me . So there!
Interestingly, the patent drawing shows a swivel jaw arrangement too, with the swivel being on the dynamic jaw, unlike most I've seen. Is one of yours like that? None of the patent drawings are exactly like mine or 454ragtop's.
on what Autopts said, at least as to keeping it in good shape. I'd still use it, but infidelity not abuse it!







I posted this over in the general tool discussion and a member suggested that I post here also. I just joined GJ hoping to gain a little more information from some of you guys regarding my Wilton bullet vise I recently acquired. I have exhausted my research efforts and have determined that it is to the best of my knowledge an oddity. It is "Chicago" marked and also marked "Pat. Pend.", this leads me to believe that it was made in 1941. It must weigh 100 pounds.
I traded a fellow a Yost 33C for the Wilton because I have had an infatuation with these bullet vises for several years now and I finally have one. I would appreciate your comments.
The left side of the vise is marked "Wilton Tool Corp" "Chicago" and the right side is marked "Wilton Vise No 60" "Pat Pend Made in USA".
![]()
![]()
![]()
Of course, it's good to be here guys. I appreciate your knowledge. I can take more pics if there is anything you would like to see. My wife is less than pleased with it sitting on the kitchen counter… I told her I would move it after I take a few more pics. Truth is, I'm fairly intrigued by it and am now wanting to learn as much about it as I can. What say you guys?

The first is kind of sad, it's a huge Reed that has been abused and neglected since before I started working there. Someone was pretty reckless with a grinder over the years and the lead screw is definitely trashed. My guess is the screw is missing threads or something because you often have to turn the handle a few times then pull the dynamic jaw toward you to open it. Although it does still clamp down...not sure what the problem is. The handle is also no stranger to hammer blows.
![]()
Hi, 95riosnake
On your Wilton restore, I would not mill the "anvil" face. (They call it an anvil, but we all know you shouldn't be beating on it!). You'd get a more authentic look by smoothing it with a belt sander. I'm not a Wilton expert, but on the vises I've paid that much attention to the flattened surface are ground, not milled. Unless you have a surface grinder, a belt sander works fine. If you just love milling things, go ahead and then take the mill marks out with a touch of the sander. 120 grit gives a good appearance, to me.
The one exception I've made is when A_pmech made a pair of custom jaws for my dp vise. They are such works of art I'm leaving the mill marks proudly displayed!
It looks like the collar is missing in the front of the dynamic where the leadscrew goes in. You can see how it is cocked to one side. Something there ain't right...
It looks like the collar is missing in the front of the dynamic where the leadscrew goes in. You can see how it is cocked to one side. Something there ain't right...
Craftsman 391-5188 Made in Japan. It's 4 inches (I think, it's in the shed now, could be 4.5 inches).
It was free, as it came with the house. I'd like to add a Wilton torpedo vise in the future, but they can be expensive.
I have seen some of these for sale in the neighborhood of $35-$50. They need some work - is that a decent price for these?





One last bit of information… We just sat it on the scales and it weighs 109.2#
SNIP
Also, given my newfound awareness of vises thanks to GJ, I noticed we have some cool vises around the shop at work and figured I'd share some pics with you guys.
The first is kind of sad, it's a huge Reed that has been abused and neglected since before I started working there. Someone was pretty reckless with a grinder over the years and the lead screw is definitely trashed. My guess is the screw is missing threads or something because you often have to turn the handle a few times then pull the dynamic jaw toward you to open it. Although it does still clamp down...not sure what the problem is. The handle is also no stranger to hammer blows.
![]()