Do you need to run an home run from each grounding rod?
No. As others have since explained, the connections to the ground rods must be made via ONE continuous AWG 6 (or heavier) wire, with no breaks between the ground bus in the panel and the last ground rod.
I have read many of the previous threads on grounding subpanels. Many have referenced the two ground rods, non that I recall referenced running the wire back to the panel.
Well, not to be facetious, but is it not obvious that if they didn't connect back to the panel, they couldn't do any good?
I am not an electrician and you sound knowledgeable, so please explain my shortcoming in understanding. The subpanel will have its own grounding system and will not be bonded to the neutral. Ok, I understand so far. Also, it is my understanding that two grounding systems should not be interconnected. Why does it need 4 conductor wire providing grounding from the main panel if that wire cannot be connected to the ground bar in the subpanel? Where should that ground wire from the main panel terminate?
I won't swear to this; but I'm about 90% certain that it should ALSO connect to the ground bus in the sub-panel. The thing to understand here is that we are talking ONLY about the EGC "Ground" (which, if all is right with the world, will NEVER actually carry current), and NOT the Neutral conductor (which is sometimes mistakenly referred to as a "Ground", probably because it DOES get tied to ground back at the main service panel). As such, it's primary purpose is to provide an alternate (i.e., "backup") path to ground in the event of a failure anywhere else in the system (particularly in the Neutral conductor). The point here being, to take all possible measures to ensure that the least-resistance path-to-ground is NEVER through a Human.
So, with a sub-panel in a detached structure, the EGC actually gets "tied to ground" (i.e., Planet Earth) in at least TWO places: Once at/near the main service panel, and again at/near the sub-panel (well, to be pedantic about it, near where the service enters the structure, in both cases). Think "belt & suspenders." And again, all of this is completely separate and distinct from the Neutral, which is exclusively fed from (and connected to "ground" ONLY at) the main service panel.
I installed my system many years ago and I know the rules constantly change. When I did mine, I had two options: 1: Run 4 conductor to the subpanel, unbonded neutral to ground, and no separate grounding system. 2: Run 3 conductor (hot, hot, neutral) and put in a separate grounding system, again with no bonding.
AFAIK, neither of those arrangements would meet code today; but the first one is closer (and far easier to make truly "code-compliant").
I should have made it clear in my original post that the 120 volt two wire (hot, neutral and ground) feed was already there. It ran a single circuit for a light in the garage and the garage door opener. The underground supply emanates from a 30 amp breaker on the main panel at the house.
So, at least as of the moment, there is NO sub-panel in the garage, correct?
I wanted to add another circuit for a couple of small shop tools and incorporate GFI's in each circuit. I thought a subpanel in the garage with circuit breakers for each circuit would make more sense than what is there.
And I tend to agree with you. But adding that sub-panel brings with it some OTHER requirements, as "Charles (in GA)" explained quite well.
I'm in a rural area so no one is looking over my shoulder but I don't wish to do something dangerous.
Even so, you want to do this RIGHT, or not at all.
It seemed to me that this is just another circuit like all of the others that service the house itself. The subpanel in the garage is a plastic box.
HUH?!?
First, I thought we already established that there is currently NO sub-panel in the garage?
Second, I have NEVER seen a plastic subpanel. Ever. And while willing to be proven wrong, I seriously doubt such exists.
Are you sure that whatever it is you're (incorrectly, I'd wager) calling a "sub-panel" is really not just a junction box?
There is a grounding re-bar at the service entrance.
WHICH "service entrance"? If I understand the situation correctly, there is (currently) only one such place which really deserves the term -- i.e., back at the house.
Am I to connect this re-bar to something? .... if so what? ... a plastic box?
To what, if anything, is that re-bar connected now? And is it REALLY "re-bar", or is it a proper copper (or copper-plated) ground rod, at least 8-10 feet long and driven FULLY into the Earth?
Why isn't the house ground system adequate for this new circuit?
Because
IF you have a sub-panel in the garage, you then have a "service entrance" for that structure, as opposed to simply one more (far-flung, but that is coincidental) branch circuit off the main service panel. And given that, you need a proper Earth ground for the EGC.
I am using armored cable so everything appears to be well grounded in that respect.
"Armored cable" has absolutely NOTHING to do with any of this.
What you currently have is a branch circuit from the house. The house ground is sufficient and allowed for this purpose (ref. NEC 250.32(A) exception).
That's certainly what it sounds like. But then he goes back to talking about ALREADY having a "sub-panel" in the garage (which I tend to doubt, but...) -- and a PLASTIC one, at that.
However, the moment you add a sub panel and use that circuit to supply other circuits, the branch circuit becomes a feeder circuit and the new garage circuits become branch circuits and additional grounding means are required.
BINGO!