To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

tell me about this proto socket set

goodwrench

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
173
found it pawn shopping this morning. I don't know much of this brand, so any info you can give me is appreciated. I was wondering about the vintage of these? Any idea the year? What is the quality of these? any history of proto would be nice.. So whatcha think??
1protolid.jpg

2protosticker.jpg

3inside.jpg

4socketsall.jpg

5extensions.jpg

6socketclose.jpg

7ratchet.jpg

8headback.jpg

9headfront.jpg

Any guesses what i paid? What would you have paid? I wasn't sure the worth but i hope i did good at 40$$ whatcha think???

later!! chris
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

v8garage

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
901
Location
Texas
Not sure about the vintage on these. I would think probably 1980's or 1990's. Proto made that style ratchet for a long time. Those ratchets are tough but are not very fine tooth. Usually about 24 tooth. I like the fact that it is a 6 point set. I would say it is well worth the money.:thumbup: Is the universal a Proto? It looks like a Craftsman in the picture.
 

cruiser808

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
1,921
Location
Hawaii
Yeah, ya did good and deserve a "you ****" award. I have that set and it's mid-80's to mid-90's vintage. Most of my tools are Proto and they have served my well over the years, both as a money maker and a weekend wrench. MSC or Grainger may have an updated version of the set that you can check for a retail price comparison. You may want to soak the universial in some Kroil as it looks kinda rusty. And of course, lather the insides of the ratchet with Merk's red lube of love.
 

cruiser808

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
1,921
Location
Hawaii
Not sure about the vintage on these. I would think probably 1980's or 1990's. Proto made that style ratchet for a long time. Those ratchets are tough but are not very fine tooth. Usually about 24 tooth. I like the fact that it is a 6 point set. I would say it is well worth the money.:thumbup: Is the universal a Proto? It looks like a Craftsman in the picture.

It's definitely a Craftsman. :thumbup:
 

posaune

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
899
Location
Collinsville, Connecticut
It *****. Send it to me and I'll dispose of it properly. :lol_hitti

When I got frustrated with the quality and/or design of Craftsman recently, I started getting Proto whenever I could. Everything seems to be high quality and well built - definitely better than Craftsman's recent offerings imo.

MSC lists that set HERE, so yes - the "you **** award" goes to you today. :thumbup:
 

MOPARHOUND!

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
697
Location
Kansas City
Looks to be Stanley produce Proto, but definitely bought right. Biggest plus is it's all 6-point, hard to find second-hand as a set.

Proto's head design is surprisingly strong for the thickness of the head, hard to break one. The best part I like about Proto's ratchet is the minimal ratcheting resistance the mechanisms have.
 

riley.m

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
348
Location
Port Townsend Wa.
i love proto tools.that is a nice set you got.does anyone know anything about the bronze selector and when it was being used.i have a plomb 1/2 drive with a bronze selector and a 1/2 proto without but my 3/8 drive and 1/4 drive proto ratchets have bronze selectors.anyone with insight?
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Bolster

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
4,056
Location
Mexifornia
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there's a big difference between the Ingersoll-Rand Proto ratchets (1960-1984) and the subsequent Stanley Proto ratchets (1984-on) in terms of function or quality.

Over time I think the Proto pear style heads got a little stouter as did the neck, but I can't say for certain when the "thickening" occurred.

And at some point the chrome became more "chrome-y," more of that "liquid silver" look you see on new SO, TopTul, Blackhawk, and many others...
 

v8garage

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
901
Location
Texas
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there's a big difference between the Ingersoll-Rand Proto ratchets (1960-1984) and the subsequent Stanley Proto ratchets (1984-on) in terms of function or quality.

Over time I think the Proto pear style heads got a little stouter as did the neck, but I can't say for certain when the "thickening" occurred.

And at some point the chrome became more "chrome-y," more of that "liquid silver" look you see on new SO, TopTul, Blackhawk, and many others...

It seems like everyone wants to knock the Stanley Protos. I guess it is just because they don't like the Stanley Co. As far as I know all Proto stuff is still US made and I can't tell that the quality is not just as good or better than the old stuff. Most of my stuff is old but I do have some never sockets. They have larger and better lettering than the old ones. I also use a lot of newer Proto stuff on the nuclear plants that I travel to around the country. A lot of people may not know it but operating nuclear plants supply all their own tools for the work to be done there. They don't want you bringing your own tools in. Traditionally most of the tools have been Proto however now I am seeing a mix of Williams, Stanley, Wright and a sprinkling of Snap-On and Craftsman along with the Proto.
 

cruiser808

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
1,921
Location
Hawaii
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there's a big difference between the Ingersoll-Rand Proto ratchets (1960-1984) and the subsequent Stanley Proto ratchets (1984-on) in terms of function or quality.

Over time I think the Proto pear style heads got a little stouter as did the neck, but I can't say for certain when the "thickening" occurred.

And at some point the chrome became more "chrome-y," more of that "liquid silver" look you see on new SO, TopTul, Blackhawk, and many others...

Bolster - you're correct about the ratchet heads getting a bit fatter over the years. I put two of my Proto 5449 1/2" ratchets side by side and it seems the smaller head is pre-Stanley (prior to 1984). Also, the chrome is more of a brushed style whereas the newer Stanley version is polished chrome. The good news is that ratchet kits will work on both of them.
 

MOPARHOUND!

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
697
Location
Kansas City
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there's a big difference between the Ingersoll-Rand Proto ratchets (1960-1984) and the subsequent Stanley Proto ratchets (1984-on) in terms of function or quality.

Over time I think the Proto pear style heads got a little stouter as did the neck, but I can't say for certain when the "thickening" occurred.

And at some point the chrome became more "chrome-y," more of that "liquid silver" look you see on new SO, TopTul, Blackhawk, and many others...

I like the ratchets, old and new. I could be wrong, but IMO, the socket quality I believe is not what it use to be, but still made to a good quality standard.
 
Last edited:

48548

Well-known member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
4,029
Location
Phoenix
you are correct for sure about the heads getting wider on the newer stuff, the IR proto's were pretty narrow around the bottom plate that can be removed and changed, where as the newer ones had a lot of metal on the narrow parts of the plate.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom