There's a lot of mis-information on this subject.
Amen. And in this thread, too!!!
ACI 318-08. This is the reason why you first need to have the slab dsigned by a licensed civil engineer. Any repair or changes of fdn and paving will be expensive after the concrete is cured. Again, concrete will not crack if designed correctly.
I know many licensed civil engineers who are not qualified and can't properly figure this out. ACI does have a guide for the design of these slabs and - BTW - ACI spells out very clearly that all concrete cracks and all you can do is control the width of them.
For this type of application, hiring an engineer to design the slab is overkill. (It's only light duty.) However; ACI does provide the best practices and guidelines for the design.
if there are cracks and you are putting control joints in, couldn't you run rebar just in the area of the control joints only? Maybe like 3' pieces perpendicular and then tie them together parallel to the control joints?
There are applications where you might put "pins" across the joints to hold the slab sections together, but in this application, the reinforcement (WWF or rebar) is for crack width control. For crack width control, you want a consistent cross sectional area ratio of concrete to steel, otherwise you'd get a differential effect in different areas of the slab.
Plans are to have the floor of the barn 4" thick with two pads 8" thick for a future lift.
If you do this, you'll want to separate the slab sections (with differing thicknesses) with an expansion joint. The thicker section will build up greater forces related to shrinkage, so you'll need more reinforcement there if you want consistent crack control across the various slabs. Adding in the expansion joint (full section) also allows you to design the reinforcement for the different sections independently.
In the house I'm building, I isolated my garage slab from my house slab and also divided the house slab in to two sections with an expansion joint. I then had a different reinforcing plan for each of the three sections. My foyer got over-reinforced with lots of rebar so I didn't need any control joints cut at all, my shop space got WWF and closely spaced control joints, and my garage got a more typical rebar reinforcement with more distantly spaced control joints. It worked out really well and the combination of strategies paid off. I was able to invest in rebar where I needed it and forgo the expense where I didn't need it - an no cracks outside of the control joints.
So pricing it out, 1/2 bar spaced 18" gridded OC would add approx $2200 to the build, what are the opinions on whether this is needed or not? All concrete will be 4000psi placed on a compacted sand base.
If cost is a factor and you are going to keep one part of the slab thin, then I'd isolate the different sections with an expansion joint and only put rebar or WWF where you need it.
To figure out how much reinforcement (WWF or rebar) you really "need" for this type of application, you have to decide how you want to do crack width control. How many control joints do you want and how closely spaced do you want them to be on each of the slab sections? Once you know that, you can figure out how much reinforcement you need. IMO - 8" on the lift slab is overkill. I'd just go with 5 or 6" to make sure you get the minimum 4" required by the lift manufacturer. That will save you some money also. As LLWillysfan points out above, the strength is in the base.
BTW - There is also a game of probabilities here. It's impossible to calculate how much cracking you will encounter or where they will occur. Adding reinforcement or placing control joints closer together will only increase the probability that your cracks will occur within the control joints. Even a properly designed floor can develop cracks in unwanted places. So, you can also add reinforcement as an insurance policy, etc.