So here's a question that can raise a good amount of debate and I'm sure its been asked before, but I'm also sure the answer changes with economy.
Is a pole barn a good investment as far as the value of your home is concerned?
I am buying a property in a suburb of Chicago. It's a really nice 2.75 acre lot with a pond (lots of this size and as nice are rare for the area). The house on the property is nice enough but has no garage whatsoever. I am considering building a 40x48 pole building (I currently have a cheap race car and a 28ft trailer and a lift, plus two trucks and a car and a couple of toys) but with the quotes tallying $90-$100k, I'm wondering how much of that money I could recover if I sold it?
Here is specs of proposed building:
40x48, 16ft to the eave, insulated and finished inside, water, electric, radiant heat, one 14x14 foot door and two 10x10, three windows down each side.
As for the building, I figured, generally, bigger is better, especially since the house has no basement (which is unusual for the area) and lacks adequate storage. I also thought it would be good to incorporate a high height and large door in case I decided to sell as it should hold a decent sized RV.
The reason I ask is that the cost is going to be a struggle to do as financing likely won't be an option. Additionally, the house is not exactly to our tastes and if we can't afford to rebuild it down the line, we may just move, and I don't want to eat all of the cost of the garage.
Would I be better off going with something smaller that would may give me a better opportunity to recoup my money?
Is there any type of rule of thumb with respect to a garage not being above a certain percentage of the cost of the property/home?
A lot of questions, I know, but these are the things I'm asking myself.
Is a pole barn a good investment as far as the value of your home is concerned?
I am buying a property in a suburb of Chicago. It's a really nice 2.75 acre lot with a pond (lots of this size and as nice are rare for the area). The house on the property is nice enough but has no garage whatsoever. I am considering building a 40x48 pole building (I currently have a cheap race car and a 28ft trailer and a lift, plus two trucks and a car and a couple of toys) but with the quotes tallying $90-$100k, I'm wondering how much of that money I could recover if I sold it?
Here is specs of proposed building:
40x48, 16ft to the eave, insulated and finished inside, water, electric, radiant heat, one 14x14 foot door and two 10x10, three windows down each side.
As for the building, I figured, generally, bigger is better, especially since the house has no basement (which is unusual for the area) and lacks adequate storage. I also thought it would be good to incorporate a high height and large door in case I decided to sell as it should hold a decent sized RV.
The reason I ask is that the cost is going to be a struggle to do as financing likely won't be an option. Additionally, the house is not exactly to our tastes and if we can't afford to rebuild it down the line, we may just move, and I don't want to eat all of the cost of the garage.
Would I be better off going with something smaller that would may give me a better opportunity to recoup my money?
Is there any type of rule of thumb with respect to a garage not being above a certain percentage of the cost of the property/home?
A lot of questions, I know, but these are the things I'm asking myself.
Last edited:
