BB: your educated guessing is pretty good so far and happy to watch and learn. in case SB wants to see what a Morgan star vise looks like here's a couple pictures of mine for the thread.
Looks just like mine Morgan Aurora no. 4!
BB: your educated guessing is pretty good so far and happy to watch and learn. in case SB wants to see what a Morgan star vise looks like here's a couple pictures of mine for the thread.
yeah, that feller way up in post #2 had it pegged as a Morgan (or a Morgan copy)

Yeah, and I have never seen a USA machinist's vise that the jaws were not precisely a standard width, such as 3.5", 4", 5", 6", 8", etc. unless the sides of the jaws were ground off by some neanderthal, but the OP's vise does not look to have ever been ground on.I have never seen a foreign copy of a USA machinists vise.
Yeah, and I have never seen a USA machinist's vise that the jaws were not precisely a standard width, such as 3.5", 4", 5", 6", 8", etc. unless the sides of the jaws were ground off by some neanderthal, but the OP's vise does not look to have ever been ground on.
PM me your email address and I will send you what I have on the Morgan jaw faces (pdf file)
PS - I would have treated the jaw faces and screws with Kroil for 24 hours before even attempting to remove them!
Today I've been working on removing the Removable Jaws from this vise. It has been unpleasant work.
The distance between the two 5/16-18 holes in the Removable Jaw looks to be 2-1/4 inches between centers. Does that match the spacing in the 4-inch Morgan Removable Jaw? Does the Morgan Removable Jaw have a very "vertical" countersink as opposed to the flatter countersink screw in the picture?
Scott
Another example of the 4 Standard Vise is posted on The Vises of Garage Journal thread on page 584.
This one doesn't swivel.
It was posted on a Craigslist ad in Baltimore, MD.
Based on these 3 examples, it would seem there was national distribution for this vise brand. We've got one on the west coast, this one on the east coast & my example that seems to be from North Dakota.
Scott
![]()
sbosecker, are the jaw faces too hard to file? From the photos, it looks like they could be freshened up by hand if a file will cut them.
There was a Standard Tool Company in Athol Mass that may have sold vises. It may also have been known as Athol Machine Company.
SB: i haven't forgotten about the Standard vise specs you asked me to get for you off of mine and actually made an attempt to find it yesterday. hopefully i'll have it this weekend. which measurements did you want besides the width of the jaws?
by the way a lot of guys are having issues with trying to buy screws for old vise jaws and if you check the Vise Repair 101 thread i think Nines was just asking for some and was given information from other members.
by the way i like the way you are like a bulldog on the search for the history of this vise. i'm wondering if my Morgan 130 might have the same swivel base as my Standard vise since yours has the 130 on it?
Coward!
Ha!
Best regards,
Scott

My screws have the steep angles on them just like those replacement screws. Your flatter screw is probably the wrong one.
I'm telling you, PB Blaster is not Kroil by a long ways!
also, if you have a torch, even a small handheld mapp gas one, it would work wonders on removing these screws by heating up the jaw face first (then use freeze spray on the screw)
SB: nice work getting the jaws off. i made another attempt to find my Standard vise and came up empty, but i think I've narrowed it down to where it might be hiding now. measurements coming soon (I hope).
SB: will do and crossing my fingers i can find it.
SB: will do and crossing my fingers i can find it. by the way if you wouldn't mind posting up some of your vise repairs over on the vise repair 101 thread for all of us to enjoy and have an easy way to look up later that would be great. you don't have to do like McB did on his 7 page post, but a few posts with all your issues and fixes might help others and maybe you too later.
SB: some slop is not unusual. you don't really want it super tight, but some shims or a little JB weld to add to the size of your vise nut to keep slop to a minimum might not be a bad idea. i think i remember you saying you don't weld, but if you have slop from side to side and you need the base of the vise nut enlarged because it's worn from wear then some weld on that section with the vise nut out of the vise so you can then sand to make a better fit might be the best fix.
how did your vise work before you took it apart? if you were happy with the way it worked and were just cleaning it up then leave it as is. read the posts on the vise repair thread #117-124 of McB's to see how he shimmed up a few different issues.
SB: i found the Standard vise i own this afternoon so i grabbed it with the Morgan 130 and the Morgan Star 4 and took a group shot.
the width of my Standard vise is right at 4 inches and the slide is 15 inches and my screw sticks out about a half inch. it seems to work fine and the old timer i bought it from might have replaced the main screw because he cut original handle off and did a little phillips screw and small tap in the old handle to use it again. if my Star vise wasn't in way better condition i'd use it's screw for the Standard vise because it looks like it would have been the original one.
now looking at the Morgan 130 and my Standard 4 together the swivel bases are almost identical and the Morgan's feet are just a little different shaped.
i still have all 3 sitting on a bench at my house so i'll leave them there for a little while in case you have any other questions.
Scott: since yours (and my) Standard vises are maybe 70 years old it's hard to say what a prior owner or owners have done to them. i know the handle was cut off of mine and maybe a new screw put in the old one's place.
Another interesting comparison would be to remove the base from all three of these vises and see if there are any clues that might help confirm or deny Morgan as the manufacturer of the Standard Vise.
I take it BlueBolt hasn't heard back from Morgan regarding his query.
Best regards,
Scott