propav8r
Well-known member
I should snap some photos of my daily driver 1983 Volvo Turbo wagon. Looks a hell of a lot better than that, and it has 338,000 miles on it.
From late 60's to about 1985 was a terrible time for cars. Manufacturers were devoting up to half their engineering effort to safety requirements and emissions controls.
No they didn't.

It just struck me as odd that this was ever something acceptable in a manufacturing environment.
They got better on the '83 model. I've never seen a bad weld on an '83...lol.

Just because it lasted this long (and we don't know what kind of history the car had), doesn't mean it is structurally sound.
No one on this forum (or maybe anywhere) would say yes.
I would hope automated welding processes have improved in the 33 years since that frame was welded.
When was the last time you personally inspected the welds on the top side of a new car before you signed on the dotted line?
How many of you have even been inside an automotive assembly plant?
I find it interesting that one guy suspects that the welding on his automobile frame is insufficient and a whole crowd of armchair structural experts chimes in and condemns everything that a manufacturer has done in the last 40 years.
No they didn't.
Now just who do you think you are, trying to introduce logic into a Detroit-bashing thread?![]()

Standard practice for any rally car build regardless of where the base car was manufactured.First thing Vermont Sportscar does with their Subaru rally cars is weld every seam.
It was acceptable. It worked for over 3 decades and will continue to do so if you leave it alone. That's what production manufacturing is about...A reasonable service life at the lowest possible cost. Your frame itself actually looks to be in very good condition. Admittedly, the welding is not pretty but it was certainly adequate.
And for you yahoos w ho claim they have never welded in their lives and could do a better job, I hope you're shooting from the lip. It's not as easy as it seems, especially if you plan on doing something that takes a pounding like an automobile frame.
Years ago, there was a funny write up about a guy restoring a Corvette, planning to duplicate every factory screw up right down to the last detail.
Damn, maybe some Corvette owner has that story....it's freaking hilarious!

We would always wonder how they
stayed together in the first place........especially in accident scenario.
just head over to the corvette forum, half the guys on the C3 section can't do anything without the proper chalk marks on their frames...for some reason these models owners are owned by a level of restorer that just makes me scratch my head...which presents a dillema for the OP. if he doesn't leave those ugly welds as they left the factory, he'll never be able to resell it for anything more than scrap a donor car...![]()
I don't want my car to be exactly as it was in 1967. I want it to be as I imagined it in 1967.
So .... it lasted 33 years without a problem ? What's the gripe ?? I doubt that any of the car manufacturers care about what the welds on the chassis look like.
Not trying to bash anything, just showing my observations. Corvettes, Camaros, Firebirds imo were some of the most shoddy slapped together hot rods that ever left GM plants. My biggest gripe? Caulk. The way they caulk the things from the factory was terrible. Other cars suffered pretty bad, but EVERY 70s-80s 'vette or mulletmobile had just gobs of caulk built up in the trunk, firewall, and every other seam. They threw that stuff at them by the gallons from what I've seen. I can see doors not lining up all that well, same for the hood and trunk. It's a production car. Overspray is fine by me, if it bothered you back in the day you could wipe it off. But the gawd awful caulk monster standing up under the trunk lid on Camaros/Firebirds under the back glass would have drove me insane!! Same goes for the shoddy work on the firewall. If you want 'correct' you got to throw it on thick 'n sloppy!! Me, I let the owner know I'm cleaning that up because if I paint over that mess they tend to forget and then I get yelled at. Just my observations from working on waaayy too many cars over the years, that stands out the most for me. All of them were never close to the standards we expect today, but sheesh some just bug the heck out of me.
Go home, robot; you're drunk!
trunk? hmmm on a vette? caulk? guess my '68 427 didn't get that option...
Sigh, I knew there would be a smarta$$ in the crowd. Did you miss the part where I said 70s-80s which I was meaning for the Camaro/Firebird!!??? I'm meaning look at your firewall/cowl area if your car is original, most of those that I have seen were slathered with caulk from the factory. Plus funny how you mentioned you have a 68, aren't those the ones that was considered one of the worst years of fitment/panel alignment when they were new? Guy that I used to moonlight for restores Corvettes for a living and he hates when he gets a '68+ car. He always says 67 was the last year for a Corvette. I do like the C3 myself. Like I said, just a casual observation that I have noticed from the 17 years that I have been steadily been doing paint/bodywork on cars. I wasn't trying to start a pi$$ing match just an observation I have noticed with a particular GM lineup that annoyed the living **** out of me when I get as I call an unfucked with car, as in original.
Were I to have been alive then to be a new car buyer, when I popped the hood or trunk on a new car and saw globs and globs of sealer, I probably would have went out and bought a Mustang.......... Probably not but it would have been fixed before it left the lot for me lol!












Were I to have been alive then to be a new car buyer, when I popped the hood or trunk on a new car and saw globs and globs of sealer, I probably would have went out and bought a Mustang.......... Probably not but it would have been fixed before it left the lot for me lol!
Thankfully, these are problems of the past, since a great majority of auto welds are now done with robots.
Now that your chassis is clean, OP, it won't take tons of prep time to re-do those welds. I bet you could grind down the nastiest of the welds, splatter and mig wire in a couple of hours. It'll be satisfying.
Was the metal used...poor metallurgy.. idiots toyota are. But at least they bought them back or replaced the frames. 99-06 tundras are the same way, but its all frame replacement.

So what's their excuse now? LMAO!Here's the giggle for this thread - I messaged a friend who happens to be a long term GM employee, Corvette development engineer, and enthusiast, to inquire about manufacturing methods and issues. Those frames were an outsourced component that were manually welded by a human, and yes the quality on many of them did ****. The long and short of it is that it was an angry time between the UAW and GM management, and seeing **** work being accepted by union inspectors was common at GM.
Lol, ain't that the truth!more like Dana corp. they where the ones that fucked this up bad and ended up also paying a **** load of money for their fuckup. toyota fucked up by using a US manufacture![]()
