To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

What do you guys think about this box?

To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

zkling

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
16,939
The original poster asked about a specific box. I rendered an opinion that he could go with a Craftsman as I did for a lot less and he'd be just as well off and have money in his pocket to fill up the box.

After that others countered that statement, and that's fine, that's your opinion as I have mine. But to say "there's no way that they are equal" is once again, YOUR opinion. In my book, you overpaid. In your book, you got a "superior" box. Both are opinions..just like Chevy is better than Ford or Dodge is better than Buick.

It seems that around here, unless it's Snap On, it's junk. I will say it again: an old Craftsman does everything that a Snap On does, just as good, just as well for less money. You think otherwise, that's fine.

I mean if Snap On made toilet paper, would you say, "well after all, it's Snap On, it has to be better than Charmin!" Ya'all have to stop drinking the Snap On Kool Aid and believing that just because it has a Snap On badge, it's got to be superior.

It is NOT an opinion, it is a fact. You just can't seem to realize that. Based on some of your other posts on this forum, intelligent, fact based arguments don't seem to be your forte, so I doubt this will get us anywhere.

No one is saying that craftsman boxes aren't good. Just that this particular snap on box is better than the older craftsman boxes. That is just a fact which can be back up with empirical data.

And yes I have had the old craftsman boxes, 657s a 655, HF44, even industrial cabinet better than the snap on boxes in question. The build quality of the old craftsman boxes vs the late 80s snap on boxes is just not there, especially on the top chests.
 
Last edited:

Ponchoguy

Banned
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,399
It is NOT an opinion, it is a fact. You can't seem to realize that. Based on some of your other posts on this forum, intelligent, fact based arguments don't seem to be your forte, so I doubt this will get us anywhere.

No one is saying that craftsman boxes aren't good. Just that this particular snap on box is better than the older craftsman boxes. That is just a fact which can be back up with empirical data.

No, I think you refuse to believe that there ARE equals to Snap On. Again Snap On does not equal "the best of everything".

What empirical data do you have and why is this particular one better than a Craftsman?
 

Lookin4'67Galaxieconv

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
16,635
Location
Atlanta, GA
No, I think you refuse to believe that there ARE equals to Snap On. Again Snap On does not equal "the best of everything".

What empirical data do you have and why is this particular one better than a Craftsman?

There are equals to Snap On, they're known as Mac, Matco, Cornwell, etc. Craftsman is not one of them.
 

zkling

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
16,939
No, I think you refuse to believe that there ARE equals to Snap On. Again Snap On does not equal "the best of everything".

What empirical data do you have and why is this particular one better than a Craftsman?

I do not, I am fully away there are equals and even better than snap on boxes. However, and I can't stress this enough.

YOUR CRAFTSMAN BOX IS NOT ONE OF THEM, especially compared to that specific KR657

How many KR657s have you owned? How about HF boxes? Matco? Mac? Cornwell? Vidmar? Lista? Waterloo?
 
Last edited:

Ponchoguy

Banned
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,399
I do not, I am fully away there are equals and even better than snap on boxes. However, and I can't stress this enough.

YOUR CRAFTSMAN BOX IS NOT ONE OF THEM

As previously stated, this is your opinion. Where's the real world, in use facts from you?
 

Ponchoguy

Banned
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,399
It is NOT an opinion, it is a fact. You just can't seem to realize that. Based on some of your other posts on this forum, intelligent, fact based arguments don't seem to be your forte, so I doubt this will get us anywhere.

No one is saying that craftsman boxes aren't good. Just that this particular snap on box is better than the older craftsman boxes. That is just a fact which can be back up with empirical data.

And yes I have had the old craftsman boxes, 657s a 655, HF44, even industrial cabinet better than the snap on boxes in question. The build quality of the old craftsman boxes vs the late 80s snap on boxes is just not there, especially on the top chests.

Once again, your opinion. Where's the facts, Jack?
 

Ponchoguy

Banned
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,399
I do not, I am fully away there are equals and even better than snap on boxes. However, and I can't stress this enough.

YOUR CRAFTSMAN BOX IS NOT ONE OF THEM, especially compared to that specific KR657

How many KR657s have you owned? How about HF boxes? Matco? Mac? Cornwell? Vidmar? Lista? Waterloo?

Where's the facts, Jack? You made the statement about having the data, now back it up.

You do realize that Waterloo has made tool storage for just about everyone on your list, right? (Now you do.....I just told ya).
 

zkling

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
16,939
Once again, your opinion. Where's the facts, Jack?

I will, but you need to do your part, again because I no longer have a craftsman box here.

Take a few drawers out of your craftsman box and take a picture of the inside wall of the box, where the drawer slide channels mount.

Take a picture of the overall drawer outside of the box. Then take a picture of the side of the drawer where the channel is welded.

Use a micrometer to measure the thickness of the drawer and body sheet metal.

Take a picture of the underside of the craftsman box top surface.

When you post these I will do the same for the snap on box in question.

Now, here is the big question; when you realize you are wrong, what will I get out of it? Will you finally admit it or will you still be in denial?

Where's the facts, Jack? You made the statement about having the data, now back it up.

You do realize that Waterloo has made tool storage for just about everyone on your list, right? (Now you do.....I just told ya).

You do realize whom you are talking to right? Not to be arrogant, but again, just facts. I am probably one of if not the most knowledgeable person on this forum for ~60's-early 90's tool boxes.

What you seem not to understand is that waterloo made different spec boxes for different labels.

With that I'm done, either post up the criteria above or just stop.
 
Last edited:

Ponchoguy

Banned
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,399
I will, but you need to do your part, again because I no longer have a craftsman box here.

Take a few drawers out of your craftsman box and take a picture of the inside wall of the box, where the drawer slide channels mount.

Take a picture of the overall drawer outside of the box. Then take a picture of the side of the drawer where the channel is welded.

Use a micrometer to measure the thickness of the drawer and body sheet metal.

Take a picture of the underside of the craftsman box top surface.

When you post these I will do the same for the snap on box in question.

Now, here is the big question; when you realize you are wrong, what will I get out of it? Will you finally admit it or will you still be in denial?



You do realize whom you are talking to right? Not to be arrogant, but again, just facts. I am probably one of if not the most knowledgeable person on this forum for ~60's-early 90's tool boxes.

What you seem not to understand is that waterloo made different spec boxes for different labels.

I'm talking to a guy who believes as his opinion that a SO box is better. Nobody more than that.

With that I'm done, either post up the criteria above or just stop.

I'm talking to a guy who believes as his opinion (and nothing more than that)that a SO box is better...you put your pants on the same way I do, one leg at a time.

I'm very much aware what Waterloo does that, because in fact, I know two people that work there, and I've provided their contact information to others on this forum who needed parts information. You can look that up as part of your homework assignment.

You made the statement as a fact stating that SO boxes are better, so the onus is on you to prove that. I made a statement that he could get a Craftsman, have his needs met and have money in his pocket.

At the end of the day we'll still have our divergent opinions and life will go on. I suggest that we do just that :).
 

dodge610

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Messages
5,467
Location
North Canton Ohio
I will, but you need to do your part, again because I no longer have a craftsman box here.

Take a few drawers out of your craftsman box and take a picture of the inside wall of the box, where the drawer slide channels mount.

Take a picture of the overall drawer outside of the box. Then take a picture of the side of the drawer where the channel is welded.

Use a micrometer to measure the thickness of the drawer and body sheet metal.

Take a picture of the underside of the craftsman box top surface.

When you post these I will do the same for the snap on box in question.

Now, here is the big question; when you realize you are wrong, what will I get out of it? Will you finally admit it or will you still be in denial?



You do realize whom you are talking to right? Not to be arrogant, but again, just facts. I am probably one of if not the most knowledgeable person on this forum for ~60's-early 90's tool boxes.

What you seem not to understand is that waterloo made different spec boxes for different labels.

With that I'm done, either post up the criteria above or just stop.

I will agree that you are knowledgable about your boxes. But I for one have owned Snappy boxes Craftsman,HF,Waterloo,Matco,Mac,Remline.and Other various named boxes. And I will take the old craftsman over the new snppy or any other truck box hands down. In fact I am lookin at an older craftsman box now to replace one of my other truck boxes. No one makes as good of a box as they use too that is fact.
 

dodge610

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Messages
5,467
Location
North Canton Ohio
I'm talking to a guy who believes as his opinion (and nothing more than that)that a SO box is better...you put your pants on the same way I do, one leg at a time.

I'm very much aware what Waterloo does that, because in fact, I know two people that work there, and I've provided their contact information to others on this forum who needed parts information. You can look that up as part of your homework assignment.

You made the statement as a fact stating that SO boxes are better, so the onus is on you to prove that. I made a statement that he could get a Craftsman, have his needs met and have money in his pocket.

At the end of the day we'll still have our divergent opinions and life will go on. I suggest that we do just that :).

Here Here I will drink to that.:thumbup:
 

Mohawk Dave

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2012
Messages
5,068
Location
SoCal
Damn! Trollin hard!!!!!!

oh yea, Poncho. You are wrong. And that's a FACT.

This thread is funny.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Lookin4'67Galaxieconv

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
16,635
Location
Atlanta, GA
You made the statement as a fact stating that SO boxes are better, so the onus is on you to prove that. I made a statement that he could get a Craftsman, have his needs met and have money in pocket.

Your opinion is false, it's a fact that that particular Snap On box, and most any other one, are superior to your Craftsman. The materials, design, fit and finish are superior to your Craftsman box. You asked me why didn't I get rid of my Craftsman boxes? Why would I? They're great for what I need and I'm happy with them. But I'm also not delusional enough to believe they're the same or better than Snap On quality.

If they were, there would be a lot more Craftsman boxes in professional wrenching environments.

And for the last time, when an OP posts a question about a particular product, he's not asking to hear about how you like a cheaper alternative. :wtf:
 

Ponchoguy

Banned
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,399
Your opinion is false, it's a fact that that particular Snap On box, and most any other one, are superior to your Craftsman. The materials, design, fit and finish are superior to your Craftsman box. You asked me why didn't I get rid of my Craftsman boxes? Why would I? They're great for what I need and I'm happy with them. But I'm also not delusional enough to believe they're the same or better than Snap On quality.

If they were, there would be a lot more Craftsman boxes in professional wrenching environments.

And for the last time, when an OP posts a question about a particular product, he's not asking to hear about how you like a cheaper alternative. :wtf:

I thought we had made the olive branch on this one, but I guess not....

You keep stating your opinion, which like we all said gets you on the bus with $2.75 in this town. Of course they serve your needs, I told you that 20 posts ago.

You've also yet to prove that the SO box is better. You state that it is. Put your money where your mouth is. The burden of proof is on you.

You're also wrong about the CMan in professional wrenching shops. The shop I work in is a complete NYC block long and it's filled with Craftsman boxes end to end by some of the best mechanics in the business. There's every tool box brand under the sun there.

Some of the best guys are wrenching out of Craftsman tool boxes. I didn't know you could throw your voice and speak for the OP.
 

Ponchoguy

Banned
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,399
Your opinion is false, it's a fact that that particular Snap On box, and most any other one, are superior to your Craftsman. The materials, design, fit and finish are superior to your Craftsman box. You asked me why didn't I get rid of my Craftsman boxes? Why would I? They're great for what I need and I'm happy with them. But I'm also not delusional enough to believe they're the same or better than Snap On quality.

If they were, there would be a lot more Craftsman boxes in professional wrenching environments.

And for the last time, when an OP posts a question about a particular product, he's not asking to hear about how you like a cheaper alternative. :wtf:

Facts are true or false, opinions are not facts. Care to share that Kool-Aid with the rest of us?
 

zkling

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
16,939
Sure, right after you give us the proof I've asked for. Plus, do you advocate posting other's photos of their property?

I gave you the criteria to further this endeavor. If you choose not to do that and remain ignorant, fine by me. This is a two way street.

Facts are true or false, opinions are not facts. Care to share that Kool-Aid with the rest of us?

But the thing is you choose to disbelieve those facts.

Fact: The KR657 is better built than any of the vintage craftsman boxes.

Again, how many KR657s have you owned?
 
Last edited:

1950mercury

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
2,246
Location
metro detroit
Comparing a vintage craftsman box to a KR657 is like comparing a 79 trans am to a 71 hemi cuda convertible. The cuda wins hands down as does the KR657. I guess the cuda is more expensive because of the look aid
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom