
What you want is an "impacting" ratchet. Also called a "reactionless" ratchet. HF 3/8" Earthquake is not bad. IR "Hammerhead" is probably top of the heap, but it is big and heavy.
There are some small, yet powerful 1/4" pneumatic ratchets on the market now.
Air ratchets and angle impact wrenches,important or not?
how often have you use air ratchets and angle impact wrenches?
Which part of the work?
![]()
![]()
Anyone looking at a "hammerhead" should check out the Astro Nano. End to end it is about the same thickness as the IR model and less cost.

What he said.it has about 450 ft-lbs of torque and fits in a lot of places. Not quite as small as the IR hammerhead but i am getting this gun in the near future.
![]()
Its not 450, its more like 250-300. Their spec is massively bloated. You also have to factor in your hand. The advantage to the hammerhead and hammerhead copies is your hand isn't in the way of anything.

I have seen that review. That guy does a great job reviewing them.Actually the new stubbies seem to meet their specs and exceed them even.
Review here -
He's a member here.
[emoji481]

Its not 450, its more like 250-300. Their spec is massively bloated. You also have to factor in your hand. The advantage to the hammerhead and hammerhead copies is your hand isn't in the way of anything.

With that being said, would you recommend getting the nano still? I have the 3/8" hammerhead and a standard 3/8" impact, but don't know if it is worth it to get the nano. At 450 ft-lbs I would certainly get it, but not so sure at 250.![]()

I actually have one too (M7 3/8 quiet) and rarely use it. My full size 3/8 isn't much larger, the difference in power is noticeable, and its very rare situations that the nano can fit where a normal 3/8 cant.
Personally im just not a fan. Seems like a fad with everyone coming out with their own color/brand of these nano impacts (they all seem to be coming from just 1 or 2 places).

Sometimes a small difference in size makes all the difference in the world. It can sometimes save you a lot of time and frustration. I try every power tool that I have before I attempt to remove any faster by hand, doing it manually is last resort for me. So I like to have a good variety of different powered faster removers.I actually have one too (M7 3/8 quiet) and rarely use it. My full size 3/8 isn't much larger, the difference in power is noticeable, and its very rare situations that the nano can fit where a normal 3/8 cant.
Personally im just not a fan. Seems like a fad with everyone coming out with their own color/brand of these nano impacts (they all seem to be coming from just 1 or 2 places).
I actually have one too (M7 3/8 quiet) and rarely use it. My full size 3/8 isn't much larger, the difference in power is noticeable, and its very rare situations that the nano can fit where a normal 3/8 cant.
Personally im just not a fan. Seems like a fad with everyone coming out with their own color/brand of these nano impacts (they all seem to be coming from just 1 or 2 places).
What full size 3/8 impact do you have? All the ones I see have about 300 ft-lbs including the one I own. This is why the nano at 450 ft-lbs seemed so attractive to me?
Sometimes a small difference in size makes all the difference in the world.
I've been using my SP-Air impacting air ratchet for 3 years now and really appreciate the speed it delivers. It stays in my brake servicing drawer.
The RPM speed must be double over what the typical air or cordless ratchet does. Having said that, I find myself using a cordless ratchet for interior and engine bay work as you don't have to deal with a hose, and there's better trigger control with them.
Is that air ratchet reasonably quiet? I found conflicting specs for that model with MAC listing its dba as around 90 and a supposed SP spec sheet for the SP branded one listing 83. Its bizarre because all the other specs match (specifically speed and torque).
I actually have the Nano. I like it and would recommend it. Have you watched the video review I posted before of four of the competing brands?
Their specs don't seem so "bloated" in the review. In fact they exceed their specs in the tests and any would get the job done.
![]()
