tremek
Well-known member
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xsPBNiowYoE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Dont trust the results!!!
Someone told me Snap On has sent out these torque machines with secret coding imbedded that reads when a Snap On vs other mfg is hooked up and will give erroneous results for the other manufacturer!!!


Dont trust the results!!!
Someone told me Snap On has sent out these torque machines with secret coding imbedded that reads when a Snap On vs other mfg is hooked up and will give erroneous results for the other manufacturer!!!
Dont trust the results!!!
Someone told me Snap On has sent out these torque machines with secret coding imbedded that reads when a Snap On vs other mfg is hooked up and will give erroneous results for the other manufacturer!!!

Dont trust the results!!!
Someone told me Snap On has sent out these torque machines with secret coding imbedded that reads when a Snap On vs other mfg is hooked up and will give erroneous results for the other manufacturer!!!
Dont trust the results!!!
Someone told me Snap On has sent out these torque machines with secret coding imbedded that reads when a Snap On vs other mfg is hooked up and will give erroneous results for the other manufacturer!!!

Now this is an area where you would definitely want to spend good coin. Especially if your an engine builder.
Dont trust the results!!!
Someone told me Snap On has sent out these torque machines with secret coding imbedded that reads when a Snap On vs other mfg is hooked up and will give erroneous results for the other manufacturer!!!
You guys lol, sarcasm is clearly lost here.

Nice vid...love my CDI torque wrenches
Sweet the VW switch![]()
They had it set to 40 for the 2nd tests when it was clicking off on 48So what I saw was a test for 50 f/p. The SO first went for about 49 each time on the calibrator-obviously a good tool.
However, the HF (which they said was brand new) did 48 first, then 58/59, then after backing it down and ramping it back up to 50, did 48 twice.
I really don't think that's a blanket condemnation of the HF at all. And since they said it was a new device, I'd love to see some additional iterations of it as well to help gauge either way (nothing was said of the SO wrench's age).
I went to school there for a year...funny one of their videos pops up on here.
Their technique is also, so-so... such jerky motions with the wrench. Wasn't there a Hot Rod Mag article about the 1/2" HF torque wrench testing as good as their CMan, SO, etc... maybe was a fluke.
I'd actually be more interested in the accuracy of the digital meter... then you could check your clickers.
I wonder how accurate the HF digital torque meter is, and if that could be clamped in a vice to test calibration?
Only problem with that conspiracy theory is that the guy in the video said they have tested many other brands including Craftsman that were accurate.
Was your friend wearing his tinfoil hat?
![]()
Seems like a great school with informed instructors who give a ****.
At least the torque wrench adapter from Harbor Freight is accurate and has a calibration certificate enclosed
At least the torque wrench adapter from Harbor Freight is accurate and has a calibration certificate enclosed