Aleady been discussed several times in this thread.It seems Snap=on is suing HF over this Jack.
https://www.biztimes.com/2016/09/22/snap-on-suing-harbor-freight-over-floor-jacks/
Question about trying to compare the two jacks: I saw a U-Tube video of the Snap-On Jack getting to full height in 3 1/2 pumps and saw another U-Tube video of the Daytona jack taking 5 1/2 pumps. Can someone try one or the another and tell me how many pumps each takes to get to full height empty?
Aleady been discussed several times in this thread.
Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
Well I'm not going to read all 17 pages either but I AM curious if it's been discussed exactly WHAT SnapOn was able to patent on their jack. It all looks like ordinary stuff to me except for shape. I don't believe you can patent appearance...
The linked article is short on facts.
There's enough differences in shape, wheel size, color, graphics, etc that HF will prevail, IMO....design patents are generally considered a weak form of protection because they specifically only protect the way something looks. Any variation in appearance could make it impossible to use a design patent to stop what may otherwise seem like a copy or knock-off.
Linky
How do You like your new, Harbor Freight 3 Ton Daytona Jack?My new Daytona takes 4 and a 1/4 pumps to get to full height.
How do You like your new, Harbor Freight 3 Ton Daytona Jack?
Thanks Good to know.This jack is REALY good. I have been around lots of shops and tried their jacks, used my buddies jacks, and my last 2 jacks were Torin 3.5 ton and Torin 3 ton (which I returned to Pep Boys after 1 use because it was so crappy). We have 2 land cruisers that I like to wrench on and this jack is great. Sturdy, lifts fast, long, greaseable. It has all the high end features. I think this is another HF "gem."
Harbor Freight is a large Nationwide retailer. They have absolutely no reason to be "scared" of Snap-on. I highly doubt HF is blowing out their inventory on eBay. If they really needed to blow out their inventory, they could easily do it in their own stores, or on their own website, without giving eBay a cut. After all, that's what their website and stores are for.... selling things. You know what they say, any time a deal is too good to be true, it usually is.
Buyer beware!
Yeah, after reading that I'm inclined to agree with every word of it, but I had already just took the plunge. Just in the last hour or so the listing I was watching went from 10 sold to 17 sold to 21 sold ... and I gave in. It does seem to be a deal too good to be true though I will admit.
Either way I promise to post back here with an update on whether my gamble paid off or didn't.
I just looked at the eBay listings. It's weird that the little bit of feedback those sellers have are as buyers. None of those sellers have sold on eBay in the past. It is very tempting I will agree. I also see they mentioned nothing about the 3-year warranty in the eBay listings...
It's been posted pretty obviously they aren't the same thing.
It's pretty obvious that they are not identical. What gets people interested in this jack is the price/performance ratio. Has the Daytona jack been proven that it CAN'T pick up 550s everyday?
Have you ever actually touched a "$500 Chinese red one". Let's see your Daytona pick up 550s everyday. Hell even a one ton. We also had "the beast" from Matco and it didn't compare
It's been posted pretty obviously they aren't the same thing.
The last 17 pages..
The only thing similar is they look similar but damn sure not identical. No different than them ripping off IR for impacts
Well it's obvious they're not identical. You would have to be blind to think they're identical. I'm looking for information that shows they're different mechanically or structurally. I haven't seen any proof or evidence that they are different in that aspect.
The fact that they are already being sold at far less than HF sells them for, tells me that they fall in the same category as all the rest of the junk that HF has made its 'reputation' on.
I hope that Snap on presses this as much as they possibly can, and continues their legal action to include the rest of the Snap-on clones that HF tries to pass of as 'equal'.
Ehh... Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" Only goes so far in today's marketplace, I think it's great SO is taking a stand regardless of how it turns out. I know there are a lot of members here who view snap on as the devil and feel HF is warranted to copy another design as long as they can use a coupon to purchase it.
I know... I know.... It's just like all HF jacks are awesome, but some how end up stacked 10 high on pallets and sold via wholesale/return auctions by th trailer load on a weekly basis. I've said it before ... They are extremely hit or miss, not because the hydraulic design is bad, it's the seals/QC involved. Today's Hydraulic manufacturers aren't interested in producing a 20 year hydraulic product anymore, it's not as profitable. There is a reason the Yasui design with fat Orings/Ucup's/wipers from the 70-80's are just now starting to break down for numerous members. You have to ask yourself? Why did manufacturers cheap out with Oring/retainers on the main ram? Utilize Smaller series orings? Removed wipers? It wasn't because technology went backwards... Hmmm
Btw... I'm not insinuating your Jack will fail tomorrow, but I'd be willing to bet I fielded 40+ PM's in regards to valve issues/handle feedback and leakage issues. I'm not claiming it's a large percentage based off the units sold annually to GJ members, but it was ridiculous on my end.
Will that jack lift the Dodge in the background? I don't mean weight wise, I mean height wise because of the tires.