[/b]
Heres the thing you arent considering with the GFCI. Since 240v GFCIs arent available as an outlet, u have to use a breaker which u already know. The problem with this is if u trip the GFCI breaker due to an issue on a 120v outlet, u loose power to everything.
I dont know about u, but this can be frustrating and cause issues with the material u are working on if the machine suddenly loose power.
The added cost also doesnt make sense.
For what u will spend on 120v/240v GFCI breakers, u could use for surface mount conduit or extra NM-b to have separate 120v and 240v circuits.
You may have missed it above (see my response to your inquiry about 250v duplex), but I concur. GFCI dbl pole breakers are about $100 so it doesn't make sense to use them.
So I am using GFCI outlets and feeding that ahead where I want 120 outlets. (The MWBC converts back to a two wire feed after the GFCI)
In a couple spots I have an additional GFCI outlet or two than would be strictly required, but the extra cost is nothing compared to 3 or 4 dbl pole GFCI breakers!
I appreciate that this method is a bit different than normal and probably over flexible for 250v(20a) outlets ... but it is a bit of a reaction to needling to get this done under an electrical permit I have open. I would have rather left the workshop detail and electrical to be a separate project that would let everything be customized to what is needed as many suggest, but due to trying to keep trades synchronized, I decided to build in extra flexibility ( at some additional cost).
But I don't think the cost is more. For the same result, conventional topology would need more total wire and more breakers (3x the beakers and 2x the panel spaces- each MWBC dbl pole becomes 1 dbl pole+2sngl pole). Now, it would be fair to say that the number of circuits could (should) be reduced to get back some of the cost, but I don't see a net savings at the end.
I can see why electricians would not do it this way. They make money and get quality by doing set patterns and doing it fast. It is not worth any extra thinking or complexity to do a special deal for a workshop.
So... I guess it still fair to say that thete is no NEC restriction on using 250v duplex recepticals instead of the common 1.4" single version?...
I did also see a 250v single in the decora format that would work.