Lug: so do you have a scale to weigh your new 1949 bullet so maybe we can have others weigh theirs to compare?
46 lbs 8 ozs
Actually getting Lug interested in the Wilton question could be a good thing. He has a proven ability to ferret out the contract dates and specs, and has contacts that do the same for WWII ordinance, gear, and tools...
Well, first of all, I didn't mean to open a can of worms. I'm guessing that in the absence of some kind of dated Wilton document (e.g., catalog, jobbers' paperwork, standard operating procedures, etc) you guys took the empirical approach, trying to back your way into the facts by deduction, and there is a dispute over what all the data means. That's commonplace in the WWII tool world niche, and I have spent the better part of the last 8 years getting to the bottom of some of them with deeper research.
I promised Drives I'd read through this thread, and I will try, but before I do that, I have a few questions:
(1) In my initial searches on GJ after having just found my Wilton 9400, I ran into a thread with a page from a 1950 catalog. Is that the earliest Wilton catalog (or other dated Wilton document) that includes a reference to a 5-year warranty?
(2) What is the earliest actual date stamped on the slide of a Wilton bullet shown here?
(3) Is there a key post where the data has been tabulated that I could look at rather than (or in addition to) reading through 28 pages?
As for my resources, I can look up Wilton in a 1945 War Production Board War Supply Contracts List (it's located at a no-lending library at an institution about 60 miles from me, so this won't be tomorrow or even next week), but note that it only includes contracts that were $50,000 or more in value. Also, it only includes the contract number, start and end date, value, and product. The most this would do is verify what Wilton's website already says. It won't help on the date stamps issue.
I can tell you right now that Wilton is not listed as a supplier of mechanics or machinists vises for automotive maintenance tool-sets in any US Army Ordnance Dept references I have, and none of the figures in these tool-set manuals (a good secondary source of identification) shows a Wilton bullet. Vise brands that have been verified are Morgan, Columbian, and Desmond Stephan.
Seeing the Federal Specifications code (GGG-V-436) cited on that 1950 catalog page was encouraging to me, however. The rationale is that if they were supplying vises to the federal government in 1950, there's a very good chance they were supplying them during the war.
And then I came to discover that the Wilton website may provide the best explanation yet for why they don't show up in mechanics' or machinists' tool-set manuals. If they were being exclusively used on production lines, the government wouldn't have wanted Wilton to also be supplying other agencies, even if Wilton wanted to, which would slow down their deliveries to other factories.
In fact, chucking equipment and vises were two of the first types of tools to be controlled by the WPB Limitation Order L-216, which went into effect on December 4, 1942. I've never had a reason to read the schedule that included vises before, but I'll see if I can find it. In essence, what L-216 means is that no company was making particular tools for their own inventory or their distributors (i.e., the civilian sales market) after that date, so whatever production Wilton had under government contract was it, and I'm assuming it was all they could do to meet those demands, especially as a relatively immature manufacturer.
That's why, in my interpretation, their vises weren't going to the field services setting up maintenance shops and mobile maintenance shops with anvils, vises, forges, oxy-acetylene kits, etc. Whether that should be considered a compliment by Wilton fans 70+ years later (e.g., their vise was selected for production shops for its superior action and durability) or the opposite (they were new in the industry and the low man on the acquisition totem pole), I don't know.