My "guess" is that for vertical deflection calcs for the TRUSS it would be conservative to assume there is no friction between the truss and sill plate - in other words treat that joint like a ball bearing - no horizontal reaction capability. In actuality there is some friction which results in more horizontal deflection and force on the vertical WALL, and less vertical deflection for the truss. I assume the long slots in that Simpson tie let the nails slide instead of forcing the wall outward.... but surely the Simpson designers also know the average carpenters helper is bound to drive nails that will bind up the movement at some point...
Those Simpson slotted brackets have about zero practical use in any conventional framed building as far as I can tell, and I doubt are ever used, much less correctly.
They don't make any sense- take for example a 40 foot wide building, the truss verticle load for our local snow , live and dead loads will be about 1800 lbs per truss at 24" on center. The coefficient of friction for wood on wood is about .4, so you will have to generate 680lbs of force before the truss would slide...now that is every 2 feet... looking at say the center 30 feet of a 40x50, that is 20 trusses - that is 13,600 lbs of force that need to be resisted before any sliding is going to happen.
Let's all agree that no building any of us are building is going to have sidewalls stiff enough to resist that kind of load. Changing the number of trusses makes no difference to these calculations.
This whole thing is way over stated, all that will happen is the walls will bow out very slightly under a big load and will go back when the load is removed ( snow melts).
Trying to let the truss slide over the wall is not only impossible, but would also create impossible condition for the interior trim, soffits, abutting walls, flashing....