To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

The Mysterious FILSON Tools...mystery now solved (at least, in part)!

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
I found a couple of Filson branded wrenches. Had never seen the name before, so I started the usual web research and found this to be an obscure company with a few tool photos and a lot of folks wondering who they were. So I decided to dig a little deeper to see what I could find.

A few examples of tools I found were helpful in that they appear to bear a more complete name, Henley Filson Company of North Vernon, Indiana. Even then, information on this company is almost non-existent. Most refer to a Filson company that is still in business selling outerwear and bags, but after looking into it I don’t think there’s a connection.

One tool of which I found a couple of examples is a set of M2 crimpers marked Henley Filson Co. I also found forum posts recalling their use in the military as far back as the Korean War and into the Vietnam era. One post maintained that this was a standard service crimper since WWII, implying that the tool started being supplied to the military sometime during the war. So the occasional ‘rumor’ I encountered that the company made contract wrenches for the government look to be correct.

While a few examples appear to be older, most all photos I found resemble post-war production.

I finally got lucky in locating an article on page 103 in the Indianapolis Star newspaper of 2/7/1954 that appears to be a kind of PR piece extolling the virtues of moving to North Vernon because of the business and transportation resources there. One of the companies listed having 60 to 100 employees is the Henley Filson Company, a maker of dies and forgings. Also helpful was the statement that “INDUSTRY HAS been slow coming to North Vernon, despite its abundant transportation and a location nearly midway between Indianapolis, Louisville and Cincinnati. No major industry pre-dates 1937.” It accounts this to periodic water shortages, which seem to have been resolved with the recent completing of a reservoir at the Muscatatuck State School (a large facility for the mentally retarded). There is also the indication that industry only started developing in the town as the result of war-time manufacturing needs, and then converted to commercial and consumer production after the war.

This article provides vital missing pieces of the puzzle. Based on the artifacts and available information, it appears as if Filson was started in North Vernon, not having relocated there from some place else. All artifacts with any location markings are all North Vernon. Since the article states that no industry existed in this rural agricultural community prior to 1937, it’s safe to assume that Filson opened sometime during the war. It also seems that Filson made contract tools for the military, which ties in quite nicely with the historical context of the article. This might be another tool to chase down for those military tool collectors.

Also, based on what little information is available and studying the existing artifacts, it appears that they were in business perhaps into the 1970s, but probably not beyond.

So…an important part of the puzzle has now been solved. However, all this brings up an interesting possibility. In looking at the available photos online of various Filson tools, there seems to be a discontinuous mix of designs perhaps representing three or more distinct styles, all bearing strong resemblance to better known brands. Some are marked FORGED in USA, some MADE, some MFD. Some markings are forged (including all that have the additional “Henley”), others stamped. There is even a photo showing Indestro and Filson locking pliers side by side that appear virtually identical. First impressions would lead one to believe that Filson was just a sales company having all its tools contracted out, which might also explain why there are so few online references to the company or its tools. But now we know for certain that Filson made its own dies and forgings, and thus most likely some of their own tools. It may be possible then that, at least in some cases, this scenario is reversed—that it was Filson that made contract tools for some other brands! This might also explain the variety of Filson designs—perhaps after having made the contract dies for other makers, it modified them with its own name and sold its own product based on whatever contract dies were in house at the time. Stranger arrangements have been known to have occurred in the American tool industry.

The posted photos are of the two Filson pieces I have. You’ll note the DBE has one of those odd anodized-like finishes that look brassy with hints of other colors in it. Perhaps the detailed photos can help a member identify another brand with identical geometries.

I can post the other photos I found around the web if you’d like. As long as they’re used for scholarly reference and not for any financial gain, I think they fall under the “fair use” clause of the copyright laws.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1573.jpg
    IMG_1573.jpg
    147.2 KB · Views: 206
  • IMG_1574.jpg
    IMG_1574.jpg
    145.7 KB · Views: 203
  • IMG_1575.jpg
    IMG_1575.jpg
    147.3 KB · Views: 184
  • IMG_1576.jpg
    IMG_1576.jpg
    140.3 KB · Views: 147
  • IMG_1577.jpg
    IMG_1577.jpg
    144.5 KB · Views: 143
  • IMG_1578.jpg
    IMG_1578.jpg
    148.3 KB · Views: 140
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
OP
D

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
That combination wrench is 100% classic indestro:
It's close. But there were a lot of tool companies that made very similar wrenches with 'racetrack' cross section handle profiles having a relatively flat top/bottom surface, or 'classic' style. Proto, Thorsen, P&C just to name a few. But look closer. The differences in the brands are in subtle variations of geometry. Notice on my 1st photo how wide the handle is as it meets the open end compared to the Indestro. Notice also the radius at the bottom of the open end, how the Indestro has a deeper cut, more acute radius. Also note that the top of the box end on the Filson has no recess around the opening (something like many of the late model Wright wrenches I've seen) while the Indestro does. So while I agree it is a 'classic' style wrench, they're not quite the same. I have an old Upland Forge 1-1/8 that's even a closer match to this Filson than your Indestro, but it's still not dead on.
 
OP
D

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
There are Filson wrenches that are made especially for Ford. They could be military for a Jeep, which Ford made. The wrenches are offset in the open end, and probably fit a water pump or other accessory for the engine. I have some somewhere.
I would love to see some pix of them.

What you're reporting lends more support to the idea that Filson was primarily a contract maker.
 

four.cycle

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
29,162
Location
Tacoma, Washington
DadsTools said:
It's close. But there were a lot of tool companies that made very similar wrenches with 'racetrack' cross section handle profiles having a relatively flat top/bottom surface, or 'classic' style. Proto, Thorsen, P&C just to name a few

They ARE close. Without laying them down side-by-side it's difficult to see the little differences.

Thorsen 2018 9.16 combination wrench 01.jpg Thorsen 2018 9.16 combination wrench 02.jpg
 

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,582
Location
Northern California
There are Filson wrenches that are made especially for Ford. They could be military for a Jeep, which Ford made. The wrenches are offset in the open end, and probably fit a water pump or other accessory for the engine. I have some somewhere.

I am pretty sure that no Filson wrenches were made for Ford Jeeps.
-Don
 

Username already in use

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
2,177
Location
Ohio
The short DBE with the deep offset looks suspiciously like a Jos Shaw wrench that I have. I wonder if Shaw made them for Filson? :dunno:

The font used for FORGED IN USA on the reverse side looks identical to me.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Jos Shaw DBE.jpg
    Jos Shaw DBE.jpg
    93.2 KB · Views: 1,085
OP
D

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
The short DBE with the deep offset looks suspiciously like a Jos Shaw wrench that I have. I wonder if Shaw made them for Filson? :dunno:

The font used for FORGED IN USA on the reverse side looks identical to me.

attachment.php
That does look remarkably similar to the Filson DBE. Talk about another obscure tool company!

There are a number of references online to the Joseph Shaw Company of Toledo. It's claim to fame in the hand tool arena seems to be an interesting multi- or 'bung' tool they produced, of which I found numerous examples. I also found a few examples of Shaw end wrenches, as well as the occasional reference to having been also made for the military on contract. However, unlike the solid evidence for military contract work provided for Filson by the M2 crimper, I could find no such corroboration for Shaw, only allusions to such tools. Although the bung tools have a forged in "US", this in itself is insufficient to say they were made for the military, and could just be Shaw's way of marking COO.

What I did find, however, are solid references to specialty or 'gimmicky' devices, which would be consistent with the multi-tool. There is a reference of the manufacture of those old, long spring-like devices that one would affix to a car fender that would indicate how close you were to a curb by hearing its scraping. Another reference from 1950 shows a manual mechanical device for rotating your rooftop TV antenna from inside your home for maximum reception.

The reason why I mention this much info is to address the question as to whether Shaw may have made such wrenches for Filson. The evidence does not seem to justify an assumption that Filson was the contractee and Shaw the contractor. Whereas we have hard evidence that Filson was a forging facility making contract tools, we have no such evidence that Shaw was also a forge, especially since two of the specialty devices it mfd needed no such capability. Therefore, I think it more likely, at least with what info we have so far, that the opposite assumption is more sound--that it may have been Filson making contract wrenches for Shaw (if such an arrangement actually existed between the two), which would equally explain the close similarity between the two DBEs.
 
Last edited:
OP
D

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
No, I don't think so. Most of the wartime M2 demo crimpers I have seen are dark natural steel. I am guessing 60's, but I don't know. It's not plated, but it's not natural steel finish, either.

20161024_173320_zpsq9lqsmxj.jpg
References to the tool scattered about numerous forums collectively indicate a time period of WWII through the Vietnam era.

Finding that newspaper article made all the difference! This gives us the most solid historical info on Filson tools to date. And we know now they were indeed a die and forging company, completely capable of making their own hand tools.

I find the resemblance between the Filson DBE and the one presented by Username already in use to be remarkable. Sure looks like a solid hit to me. Different Filsons I've seen online have the same uncanny similarities to other brands, including a lateral offset DOE like a Herbrand. What still needs more research in such instances is 'who made what for whom'. It may well be that the natural assumption that such wrenches were being contract-made for Filson may in fact be bass-ackwards.
 
OP
D

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
They ARE close. Without laying them down side-by-side it's difficult to see the little differences.

Thorsen 2018 9.16 combination wrench 01.jpg Thorsen 2018 9.16 combination wrench 02.jpg
Thanks for the Thorsen pic. Yes, this Thorsen is a good example of this design made by numerous mfrs. Most, however, like the Thorsen, seem to have a more graceful and refined ascent from the handle to the offset box. The offset box on this Filson combo is abrupt, the geometry (seen in my 4th photo) being like affixing the box at an angle directly to the straight handle.

I'd like to somehow find as close a match to the combo as Username found to the DBE. Would be doubly interesting to find one among the well-known brands rather than another obscure maker's wares.
 

bonneyman

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
8,854
Location
Desert SW
The short DBE with the deep offset looks suspiciously like a Jos Shaw wrench that I have. I wonder if Shaw made them for Filson? :dunno:

The font used for FORGED IN USA on the reverse side looks identical to me.

attachment.php

I've got one of those, too. Nice feel, good balance, good length.
Wouldn't mind having a complete set of those.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4277.JPG
    IMG_4277.JPG
    107.3 KB · Views: 51
OP
D

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
Do you guys think that these ignition wrenches are from the same Shaw?
-Don
They could very well be. I don't know of any other Shaw brand wrenches, but that doesn't mean much. I find it interesting that these are stamped steel, not forged, which leans me toward my suspicion regarding The Filson and Shaw lookalikes that it was Filson that was the contract forging co. for Shaw, not vise versa. My observations have been that ignition wrenches made by a company with its own tool forging also forged their ignition wrenches as well, whereas the stamped ones were cheapies made on contract for that brand, which argues toward Shaw not forging their own tools.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Jim C.

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
2,598
Here’s my addition to the Filson thread; a 9/16” x 5/8” starter/manifold wrench. I got it in a small odd lot hodgepodge of wrenches. I was going after one of the other wrenches in the group and this was included. I never heard of Filson tools prior to getting this wrench. Anyone needs it for their Filson collection, just let me know.

Jim C.
 

Attachments

  • 4AC197F0-171F-400C-B2A0-47C529469F40.jpg
    4AC197F0-171F-400C-B2A0-47C529469F40.jpg
    108.8 KB · Views: 72
  • 9F34F1A3-C890-4CDF-A114-B1BF54481C23.jpg
    9F34F1A3-C890-4CDF-A114-B1BF54481C23.jpg
    112.2 KB · Views: 64
Last edited:

twertsy

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 5, 2014
Messages
6,726
Location
Reedville, VA
Henley-Filson Co. was incorporated (DE) on 11/30/1946 in North Vernon, IN. Charles Merrill Filson // I haven't been able to discover the Henley side.

In 1950, Filson and Otto H. Kaufman (Pres of Truecraft Tool Co. Chicago) either established or moved their co-owned Precision Tool Co. to Seymour, IN for the "production finishing of socket, box and open end wrenches."

In April of 1957 the company is in receivership for bankruptcy. It is then purchased by Beurt SerVaas and produces U-Joints to GM, Ford and Chrysler. I believe it was called the Vernon Processing Co. at this time and I also found a note that they were "1 of 3 companies in the U.S. making 4-way Lug Wrenches."

Prior to the Henley-Filson company, Mr. Filson was "Works Manager" for The Broderick Co. (mentioned in E-Award notice in 1943)

So basically, 1947-1957 for this company's lifespan.
 
OP
D

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
Henley-Filson Co. was incorporated (DE) on 11/30/1946 in North Vernon, IN. Charles Merrill Filson // I haven't been able to discover the Henley side.

In 1950, Filson and Otto H. Kaufman (Pres of Truecraft Tool Co. Chicago) either established or moved their co-owned Precision Tool Co. to Seymour, IN for the "production finishing of socket, box and open end wrenches."

In April of 1957 the company is in receivership for bankruptcy. It is then purchased by Beurt SerVaas and produces U-Joints to GM, Ford and Chrysler. I believe it was called the Vernon Processing Co. at this time and I also found a note that they were "1 of 3 companies in the U.S. making 4-way Lug Wrenches."

Prior to the Henley-Filson company, Mr. Filson was "Works Manager" for The Broderick Co. (mentioned in E-Award notice in 1943)

So basically, 1947-1957 for this company's lifespan.
Thanks, Twertsy! Great information. If there were any doubt that Filson actually manufactured its own tools, these tidbits you found really ties it down. Finding Filson listed as a company's employee in 1943 and his own company's incorporation in 1946 narrows the start of the company even more. Good detective work (as usual!).

However, the date of incorporation does not necessarily eliminate the possibility that Filson was manufacturing contract tools for the military as a non-incorporated company. Everyone who could was on that bandwagon. It looks as if Broderick was a manufacturer, which would have provided Filson with a familiarity of the lucrative military contract business that may have inspired him to leave Broderick and seek his own fortune. The references I found in online forums about the Filson M2 crimpers production starting during WWII leads me to strongly consider the possibility. References to the HF M2 being made through the Vietnam era suggests that the company survived in some form after 1957. While the idea that the HF M2 extended from wartime through Vietnam could be mistaken, it could also be accurate.

In my work with vintage fishing lures and tackle, I found many references by "authorities" to historical "facts" about a particular item that upon deeper research turned out to be completely erroneous. An 'authority' publishes a 'fact' that begins to be used as the established reference and becomes a firmly established part of the lexicon in that community, especially when the item is somewhat obscure. There are many examples. I ran into a number of them from my work in that field. I just ran across another one where an 'authority' published a 'fact' that a certain patent was connected with a particular lure that has become a widely accepted 'fact'. More thorough research plus a careful examination of the patent showed that, other than the general shape, there's absolutely no connection between that patent and the lure. Just a failure to take the time diving deeper into the subject. Another infamous one was a lure package that had the date 1950 on the card, so all the 'experts' said the lure was made in 1950. A closer reading showed the date referring to a biology report from a fisheries department. I laughed hard while shaking my head. After contacting the company who marketed it and surviving members of the inventor's family, the actual release date turned out to be 1960. Sadly, if the 'authority' is popular in that community, folks will continue to parrot their 'facts' even in the face of publishing a clear refutation. This vintage forum is not immune from the same false-flag effect. I guess the biggest one was my refutation of the widely circulated 'fact' on the General forum that US General toolboxes was a mfr that was bought out by Harbor Freight. Not. There are other examples. My inside knowledge of HF's history told me that this was highly unlikely, so I did the extra digging to get the real facts.

So, when an 'authority' says something is so, but something doesn't quite seem right about it to me, based on my experiences my reaction is, "Oh yeah? Says who?" and I start digging. I also prepare myself to take the flame from the true believers for it. Goes with the turf.

So, your extra digging into the Filson case is really appreciated. There was a general sense in the community that Filson tools were contract-made for the company by someone else. It was a study of the artifacts I could find online and my own that started me thinking this was not the case, and so I drilled down into it further. Turns out that Filson not only made its own tools, but in cases where their tools exactly match those of another brand, the most probable answer is that Filson was actually the contract manufacturer for that brand, not the other way around.

Thanks again.
 
Last edited:

d42jeep

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
16,582
Location
Northern California
Since I just read the latest post in this thread this morning, it was impossible to leave this combo behind at a garage sale. My first Filson!
-DonFCF6A652-5C63-49E3-86D3-9B62AD8D303B.jpg
 
Last edited:

twertsy

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 5, 2014
Messages
6,726
Location
Reedville, VA
Thanks, Twertsy! Great information. If there were any doubt that Filson actually manufactured its own tools, these tidbits you found really ties it down. Finding Filson listed as a company's employee in 1943 and his own company's incorporation in 1946 narrows the start of the company even more. Good detective work (as usual!).

However, the date of incorporation does not necessarily eliminate the possibility that Filson was manufacturing contract tools for the military as a non-incorporated company. Everyone who could was on that bandwagon. It looks as if Broderick was a manufacturer, which would have provided Filson with a familiarity of the lucrative military contract business that may have inspired him to leave Broderick and seek his own fortune. The references I found in online forums about the Filson M2 crimpers production starting during WWII leads me to strongly consider the possibility. References to the HF M2 being made through the Vietnam era suggests that the company survived in some form after 1957. While the idea that the HF M2 extended from wartime through Vietnam could be mistaken, it could also be accurate.

In my work with vintage fishing lures and tackle, I found many references by "authorities" to historical "facts" about a particular item that upon deeper research turned out to be completely erroneous. An 'authority' publishes a 'fact' that begins to be used as the established reference and becomes a firmly established part of the lexicon in that community, especially when the item is somewhat obscure. There are many examples. I ran into a number of them from my work in that field. I just ran across another one where an 'authority' published a 'fact' that a certain patent was connected with a particular lure that has become a widely accepted 'fact'. More thorough research plus a careful examination of the patent showed that, other than the general shape, there's absolutely no connection between that patent and the lure. Just a failure to take the time diving deeper into the subject. Another infamous one was a lure package that had the date 1950 on the card, so all the 'experts' said the lure was made in 1950. A closer reading showed the date referring to a biology report from a fisheries department. I laughed hard while shaking my head. After contacting the company who marketed it and surviving members of the inventor's family, the actual release date turned out to be 1960. Sadly, if the 'authority' is popular in that community, folks will continue to parrot their 'facts' even in the face of publishing a clear refutation. This vintage forum is not immune from the same false-flag effect. I guess the biggest one was my refutation of the widely circulated 'fact' on the General forum that US General toolboxes was a mfr that was bought out by Harbor Freight. Not. There are other examples. My inside knowledge of HF's history told me that this was highly unlikely, so I did the extra digging to get the real facts.

So, when an 'authority' says something is so, but something doesn't quite seem right about it to me, based on my experiences my reaction is, "Oh yeah? Says who?" and I start digging. I also prepare myself to take the flame from the true believers for it. Goes with the turf.

So, your extra digging into the Filson case is really appreciated. There was a general sense in the community that Filson tools were contract-made for the company by someone else. It was a study of the artifacts I could find online and my own that started me thinking this was not the case, and so I drilled down into it further. Turns out that Filson not only made its own tools, but in cases where their tools exactly match those of another brand, the most probable answer is that Filson was actually the contract manufacturer for that brand, not the other way around.

Thanks again.

I don't think it possible they lasted until then. By 1960 it was definitely called Mount Vernon Forge owned by Beurt SerVaas. Mr. Filson moved to CA by 1963 and stayed there 20 years, when he moved back to Indiana and passed in '88. Could MVF have continued producing tools under the Filson name? Perhaps, but I think it unlikely.
 

Attachments

  • 7-27-1958-firesale.jpg
    7-27-1958-firesale.jpg
    19.1 KB · Views: 55

Beanscoot

Active member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
41
Location
Vancouver Island, Canada
"References to the HF M2 being made through the Vietnam era suggests that the company survived in some form after 1957."

Is there any chance that since the part was made only for the military, old dies continued to be used bearing the defunct company name, but by a different company?
 

Leviton

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 25, 2019
Messages
921
Location
Oregon
My Filson Find For The Day. 8.50 inches overall length. 3/4" & 13/16" DOE with a "1Y" on the back and "ALLOY FILSON MADE IN USA" and a sideways "V" on the front.
Any idea what the original finish might have been? I am afraid to Evapo-Rust this in case it was originally a black oxide finish.
attachment.php

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Front-s.jpg
    Front-s.jpg
    167.6 KB · Views: 348
  • Back-s.jpg
    Back-s.jpg
    142.4 KB · Views: 346
  • V-s.jpg
    V-s.jpg
    162.2 KB · Views: 17
  • 1Y-s.jpg
    1Y-s.jpg
    160.6 KB · Views: 15
Last edited:

3baygarage

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
11,978
Location
SW Florida/from Buffalo,NY
Some old half blurry pics of the little 1/4 Filson with a backwards S.

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 13356435-2691-4CED-B7E6-3704F30D2735.jpeg
    13356435-2691-4CED-B7E6-3704F30D2735.jpeg
    77.3 KB · Views: 336
  • 1E322753-45B6-4B6A-8899-87DDBDA65BA2.jpeg
    1E322753-45B6-4B6A-8899-87DDBDA65BA2.jpeg
    73.7 KB · Views: 339
  • 4AD9839D-8433-438A-957A-3928B5B0007B.jpeg
    4AD9839D-8433-438A-957A-3928B5B0007B.jpeg
    116.8 KB · Views: 340
  • 9225B798-1B07-4EA4-9D2E-32F8B4DE6EC4.jpeg
    9225B798-1B07-4EA4-9D2E-32F8B4DE6EC4.jpeg
    109.6 KB · Views: 338
  • BB24B1AE-F94F-4FE6-B8F1-6E4FA6F0C91F.jpeg
    BB24B1AE-F94F-4FE6-B8F1-6E4FA6F0C91F.jpeg
    106.4 KB · Views: 340
OP
D

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
That wrench looks Vlchek made to me.
It indeed looks very much like an old Vlchek, but I also see subtle differences compared to the AA photos. The similar Vlcheks appear to have a slight taper in the shank width from the larger to smaller end where the Filson appears to be parallel sides. The characters in the size stampings on the Filson appear much larger than those found on the Vlcheks. Also, all the Vlchek wrenches seem to have a horizontally oriented forged-in codes on the shank where the Filson is vertical. So it may not be an exact match.
 

Leviton

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 25, 2019
Messages
921
Location
Oregon
Thanks for the ideas macaxis, Lugz and DadsTools. The shank width is 0.475" on the 3/4" end and 0.525" on the 13/16" end - not much taper.

Would the sideways V have any relation to Vlchek?

3baygarage, that backward S makes for a great wrench. Nice find.
 

Oldtuleguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
10,461
Just read through the filson thread. Great info. Here is a filson ratchet that appears to be new britain made
 

Attachments

  • 20200504_180501.jpg
    20200504_180501.jpg
    87.7 KB · Views: 52
  • 20200504_180507.jpg
    20200504_180507.jpg
    86.3 KB · Views: 79
OP
D

DadsTools

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
1,852
Just read through the filson thread. Great info. Here is a filson ratchet that appears to be new britain made
I have never seen a Filson ratchet before. Kind of does look New Britain-ish. Cool find.

Filson remains somewhat of a mysterious company. I think the research here, along with the examples posted, supersedes the old idea that Filson was just a name brand that had others make all its tools on contract. It's pretty convincing that Filson did at least forge some of its own branded tools, and the evidence also suggests it made some on contract for other brands. But an example like this ratchet also indicates that others made tools for it as well--it's hard to argue that this isn't a NBM ratchet, unless Filson directly ripped it off, which seems less probable. The dizzying variety of wrench designs carrying the Filson name makes me suspect that, at least in part, Filson struck some of its own branded tools with dies it made under contract to others, so that its tool line looks like a 'flavor of the month' club.
 
Last edited:
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom