First may I too mention GREAT site...
I have read that concrete break cuts are made approximately at 10' x 10' or 12 x 12. The goal is to control the break. Yet I dont seem to see that modeled here to often? What am I missing on this?
Next in reading literature from various pex providers.... and zurn doc from link here... I see mention of dropping the pex down out of the cement at the break cut. Alternative to drop, I also see at a minimum covering the pex (with pipe foam?) at least 2' from the break cut crossing in each direction. Yet I dont seem to see that modeled here? Again, am I missing something on this?
An other concern, it would then seem best to minimize the number of time pex crosses over a break cut in cement. This would reduce the number of dips down as mentioned above or the number of coverings.
I read that concrete does 2 things: get hard and cracks. So if the break occurs then the rebar will hold it all together... I am guessing that the rebar helps prevent the movement of the now broken slabs... so thinking if the slab moved up/down ect... then that would be a potential concern w/ pex going thru. Maybe I am overthinking this... the pex should expand a bit and the cement movement should be minute? And hopefully there should be no leaks. Obviously if it heaves majorly, other issues exist.
I have also read that the pex expands inward when in cement. The cement holds the outside of the tube tight causing the inside diameter to become ever so slightly smaller as the tub expands.
So if it makes sense to minimize the number of break crosses why then are folks just tossing the tube in without concern?
I have also read about tube placement 1/3 way up from the bottom of the slab as best for performance... while they do state tubing can be attached to foam.
I have read about the different patterns when laying pex to address heat loss of walls/ 2 walls / doors and windows. I dont see much increase in number of tubes or tightness of loops at garage doors for example.
I can see the benefit of a tube going out and coming straight back as it has less resistence in pumping verses a tube with 20 turns. Overall though I think one can design with trying to minimize turns or make wide turns.
As far as tightness of loop for 1/2", I kept hearing to be no wider than 9" to avoid cold spots... and be most efficient. Wondering?
I will try to post my pex design layout this evening for feedback good & bad.
thanks
I have read that concrete break cuts are made approximately at 10' x 10' or 12 x 12. The goal is to control the break. Yet I dont seem to see that modeled here to often? What am I missing on this?
Next in reading literature from various pex providers.... and zurn doc from link here... I see mention of dropping the pex down out of the cement at the break cut. Alternative to drop, I also see at a minimum covering the pex (with pipe foam?) at least 2' from the break cut crossing in each direction. Yet I dont seem to see that modeled here? Again, am I missing something on this?
An other concern, it would then seem best to minimize the number of time pex crosses over a break cut in cement. This would reduce the number of dips down as mentioned above or the number of coverings.
I read that concrete does 2 things: get hard and cracks. So if the break occurs then the rebar will hold it all together... I am guessing that the rebar helps prevent the movement of the now broken slabs... so thinking if the slab moved up/down ect... then that would be a potential concern w/ pex going thru. Maybe I am overthinking this... the pex should expand a bit and the cement movement should be minute? And hopefully there should be no leaks. Obviously if it heaves majorly, other issues exist.
I have also read that the pex expands inward when in cement. The cement holds the outside of the tube tight causing the inside diameter to become ever so slightly smaller as the tub expands.
So if it makes sense to minimize the number of break crosses why then are folks just tossing the tube in without concern?
I have also read about tube placement 1/3 way up from the bottom of the slab as best for performance... while they do state tubing can be attached to foam.
I have read about the different patterns when laying pex to address heat loss of walls/ 2 walls / doors and windows. I dont see much increase in number of tubes or tightness of loops at garage doors for example.
I can see the benefit of a tube going out and coming straight back as it has less resistence in pumping verses a tube with 20 turns. Overall though I think one can design with trying to minimize turns or make wide turns.
As far as tightness of loop for 1/2", I kept hearing to be no wider than 9" to avoid cold spots... and be most efficient. Wondering?
I will try to post my pex design layout this evening for feedback good & bad.
thanks
. I don't know if I can answer any questions or not, but I can share from my experience of recently installing a system of my own. As far as control joints, mine worked out to be about 8' X 8'. I'm pretty sure most garages on this site that I've seen also use control joints, so I'm a bit confused on that one.
. Hopefully I answered some of your questions. Don't forget, I am definitely NOT a pro, not do I play one on TV. Good luck.