Pro mechanics don't talk about torque wrenches as a halo tool either, or compare the "tier-ness" of brands by if they have a digital torque wrench or not.
They don't? Are you a professional mechanic?
Uhmmm, that's EXACTLY what I'm arguing - the fact that the Koken is actually made in Japan is a reason it's sought after. That said, please provide me to this mystical $32 Koken ratchet link you speak of. What, $32 for the ratchet and $25 to ship from Japan?I'm really not sure what you're even trying to argue? The chinese and taiwanese Snap-On F80 equivalants (90-120T store brand ratchets) sell for far cheaper than an F80. If my SK LP90 was made in China, I wouldn't pay $50 for it either. Also, the Koken is $32, not 50. It feels smoother and nicer than my LP90, and I rank my LP90 right up there with the F80.
it's not a strawman at all. You quite literally said verbatim that because they don't have digital torque wrenches, they don't have advanced manufacturing capability. It's not just "one example", it's the only example you keep using.
Also, I did not say "verbatim" that digital torque wrenches make a tool company that produces other ratchets "top tier." If I really did, which I clearly did not, then quote me. You can't because I didn't. As an example, Harbor Freight has digital torque wrenches, and no, they're not what I would consider top tier. Top tier manufacturers are there due to various things, such as origin of manufacturing (Germany, Japan, USA), price (tend to be higher priced), warranty, reputation, performance, and then they also tend to have a full line of tools, including sophisticated instruments such as digital torque drivers/ratchets.
"Mid-tier" had direct implications about quality. Why would a high quality precise ratchet be classified as "mid-tier"? It doesn't make sense.
It makes sense, you're just confused. A Honda Accord and a Toyota Camry are impeccably engineered vehicles, but they are no BMW 5 Series, Audi A7 or Mercedes Benz E Class. It makes complete sense.
+6/-4 seconds per day means up to 120-180 seconds per month. A cheap digital watch holding +/- 10 seconds per month is literally an order of magnitude better. Literally, by the definition of order of magnitude. A mid range digital watch holding +/- 10 seconds per year is an order of magnitude better than that - two orders of magnitude more precise than that rolex.
Are you trying to imply the size of the company and number of emoloyees is somehow related to quality and "tier-ness"?
You're still arguing about accuracy (in seconds, btw), and that completely misses the point of owning a precision mechanical watch, let alone one that is certified accurate like a Rolex movement. I mean, if you want to get down to it, your cell phone is more accurate than a mechanical watch and most digital quartz watches.
