HoosierBuddy
Well-known member
When your new furnace is 40 years old how efficient do you think it's going to be?
Sometimes it's just not practical to install a 90 plus furnace,
By that time it will have paid for itself a few times over. My gas usage went down by 1/3 when installed, and after that was when NG went to $14/DTH on the NYMEX (currently it is less than $2/DTH for comparison).
Also...regarding efficiency of an engine and a furnace you are talking apples and cantaloupes. If your engine makes more HP pulling in cold air, that does not make it more efficient. Your increased power comes from the ECU (or the tuner if using a carburetor) being able to add more fuel to the engine because of the increased air density. AND...before you get too upset, I'm not saying you are wrong about the furnace. I'm just saying it's not analogous.
I don't mean to hide behind a definition but so we are on the same page, efficiency to an engineer is energy in over energy out. If you are able to add more fuel and air and get more power out of the same sized engine...that is awesome....but it doesn't in itself indicate if "efficiency" went up, down, or stayed the same.
To know for sure someone (like the manufacturer) would have to test it both ways. I've seen several furnace manuals that specify they can be installed either with or without exterior combustion air and none of that literature indicates the manufacturer claims an efficiency gain because of it just comparing the heat input (heat content of the gas times run time) vs the heat output (delta T on the downstream side of the heat exchanger X volume of heated air). Maybe they haven't tested it...or if they have they are keeping that information to themselves.
Phil
Last edited:
