This is going off-topic sorry, but I wanted see if you really can fettle a ratchet spring/springs enough to make a significant difference in back drag without effecting the function of the ratchet mechanism. Just for fun, this is no science lesson.
No offence please, CR888 and toddmorr, I realize that you don't need confirmation from me about something you already know.
I didn't have a junk pear head to mess with so purchased the cheapest 72 tooth ratchet I could find locally. 'Streetwize' with a 'z.' Obviously, results will vary with different ratchets.
The Streetwize ratchet feels like it has average back drag for a 72 tooth, somewhere between Gedore and a sealed Facom. Gedore is 60 tooth so not an exact match. My aim was to make the Streetwize similar in smoothness and back drag to the Gedore.
I already had a box of springs so tried some different shapes and sizes before committing to cutting the original springs. The conical spring is from the ratchet. This is the size of spring that reduced back drag enough to compare to the Gedore. Any smaller and the mechanism slipped. The new spring is also easier to compress.
So I started cutting one of the original springs, half a coil at a time. Surprisingly I couldn't really feel any significant difference until the spring was about half it's original size.
With the original springs cut, the back drag is greatly reduced and feels similar to the Gedore. However, the mechanism did not feel as smooth and produced louder clicks. With new softer springs, again about half the size of the originals, the mechanism feels and sounds very similar to the Gedore. Not quite as smooth but pretty close. I have tried the ratchet on a couple of bolts without issue but I'm not 100% confident that the changes will not cause issues. I would speculate that less drastic alterations would not affect function negatively at all.
Will try again with a dual pawl design if one turns up cheap.
Note. Something I didn't consider... The original springs are conical. When conical springs are compressed, the coils fit inside each other so the spring can be compressed down to the thickness of just one coil. With non-conical springs the coils sit on top of each other when compressed. This means that the original springs cannot be replaced with non-conical springs of the same length as it would not allow enough clearance for the pawls to move away from the main gear. So on this ratchet, simply replacing the original springs with softer standard springs of the same size is not an option.