Thanks for the comments, Nick!
The Speed Shelf is morphing into a Speed Wall. In it's current configuration:
A few items had been in drawers and one new arrival from
Woodpeckers or, as I occasionally refer to them, Picchio Rosso. So we have some progress to report. It's quickly becoming an evolutionary mini project with things rotating in and out plus various placement adjustments. I do have wall space planned out, but don't actually have the items I plan to mount there.
In the mean time I have been working on the L-Boxx ports which is its own project with certain component timing needs. I really wanted to keep the
Tool Trundles but the current gen1 configuration A) was garbage from a functionality standpoint, and B) would not fit under the drill press inset. Because I have as much room on the left as I do on the right (behind the HF44's), I could make a single full length trundle. It ended up being 7' long. Simple OMG-has-plywood-gotten-expensive 15/32BC and some 2x6's ripped courtesy of the new track saw rig:
The trundles need to be completed before the L-Boxx ports can go in.
Here's a learning part. It seems my research on using a foreign market cordless power tool was not 100% complete. I overlooked a key detail, which I'll explain further on.
I reused the hardware and original casters that came on the HF44's. I couldn't use the HF44 handle though; it's too tall. A simple carcass:
One upgrade was the change in caster alignment. The end units are aligned just off the front and the center caster is aligned off the rear.
I also squared them up - something I just eyeballed on gen1. Not that these casters are precision units - hey look at the source - but anything to help it track straight would be good.
It is a subtle modification, but seems to work surprisingly well. The gen1 version would roll OK, but depending on load might tip forward or backward when rolling. But because the 'channel' behind the HF44's is tight-ish, nothing ever fell out and it wasn't a problem - just an annoyance in that I knew it could be better.
One hiccup was the 1⅛ counter sink holes for the washers and nuts which I planned to use a Forstner bit on. OK for the ends, but the center unit gave me clearance issues (I could not drill a straight/level hole) with my standard cordless drill. This guy saved me from having to take apart the carcass back:
I have not measured it, but the bit center to head housing clearance is noticeably smaller, allowing me to reach against the back.
Here it is in the extended or open position:
And here it is retracted or closed:
It needs a handle, something I'll need to ponder for a bit...
My 1st use with the track saw showed some results below both my expectation and intent for use. In their defense, this saw is most likely aimed at trades in EU and as a bit of a hybrid, shipping it with a 24T makes some sense. JGer's pointed to blades and I copped that Freud you'll see below. Here I discovered an irreconcilable difference - wrong sized arbor. OK, what options are available? Bosch makes
this 56T with a better profile which ticks all the boxes on paper. Except cost. So I ordered a blade. From Europe.

So functionality was not an issue, just time and cost. I used
Axminster Tools and the experience was bar-setting for an international tool acquisition. Fair prices, immediate and clear communication, impossibly fast shipping (2 days LON > DTW) via DHL. A+ on two shipments. I ran a few tests in some leftover scraps of 1/2 Baltic Birch:
No real surprises here either. Faster is better. Better teeth, and more of them is also better. More better:
There are still some blade witness marks I need to work on. Even though not perfect, for me the results are worth it. As I look ahead to the trim in this workbench project, I don't want to have to deal with it so I'll get in some practice and tuning - is that a thing, tuning track saw rigs?
More on that incompatibility; one word. Arbor. As in 30mm. My plan to simply use locally (USA) sourced 7¼ blades, with their 5/8" arbor was toasted upon this discovery. No problem on overall diameter:
The 7¼, being just a bit smaller, meant zero concerns as far as clearance goes. But the Arbor is larger. Much larger. Here you really see the 5/8 vs 30mm difference:
So I thought what if the arbor mount was the same as other Bosch saws and just had a centering spindle that was market dependent (Hey, @Bosch, Pssst.). Negative GhostRider. So here's what I'm considering. The arbor is a very nicely machined unit:
What if I seek out a machinist to talk about turning the arbor mount (I'd order a replacement or 2) down to 5/8"; am I nuts? If you are well versed, TIA for your opinion, please comment. Yes I know I'd have to consider blades and anti-vibration scores on some models. And I'll need to run a micrometer on blade thickness. What else?
Cheers to all,
Mark
[emoji481]