We're having fun here. But I think "collector" is derrogatory. I think even
@Ryan would think so.
And I think there's a subtle difference between having a tool collection and being a tool collector.
For example: A tool collector may seek to have a collection of tools that presents a narrative: a ratchet from each generation from a given manufacturer might be one example. You can view the collection and see the advancements made in that tool. Another may collect every offering/style of a tool from a given generation. A third may collect rare or antique tools.
@Orangina comes to mind.
Alternatively, some people "collect" tools they may someday have a need for. Their tool "collection" isn't so much intended to present a narrative, as it is a bunch of tools they don't need immediately but may in the future. Some of us, myself included, when we encounter a need for a given tool, buy the set, thinking where one is required now, others may be needed in the future. That's like a collection, but we are not collectors.
Whether its woodworking tools, (which I'm more familiar with) or cameras, the pure collectors/non-users, can be extrememly helpful to the broader community and should be treated with respect (and often arent IME). Step one: don't use the terms "tool polisher' or "tool collector" derogatorily.
More:
There's a common narrative here that we are all supposed to be impressed by. I liken it to what I refer to as the Wright Brothers myth. It comes across as someone repairing something or building something to a high standard, with the worst tools and in the worst conditions. I guess we are supposed to be impressed by that and admire the ingenuity of the workmen, who can literally do more with less. Flip side People who have more advantages are considered less than. The only true measure of the value of a craftsman is how filthy they are, or how rusty their tools are.
