Tell me where you have even one datum supporting your theory? You haven't shown any so far, and I've seen NOTHING to support your theory, just attacks and sneers and smears of what I've stated as "supporting myths" Are you trolling me? don't go there...
As I said, I'm perfectly willing to agree to disagree, but if you want to tell me I'm wrong, or that you are right, support your position with facts...
I suggest Wilton's own recollection of their history as a start. As found on their website:
"From 1941 through 1945, the new Wilton 40S machinist vise was manufactured in Chicago and sold solely to the US Government. Most vises were used in munitions factories or in manufacturing of equipment used during WWII.
After the war ended, the government dumped their surplus of tools and equipment into the marketplace at huge discounts. Because Wilton vises were only sold to the government, and did not have a distribution network in place, the surplus of vises now flooded the marketplace from the government, and nearly forced Wilton out of business."
I read this as a statement that none of the 4-inch vises were offered to the public during the war years. Further, from my experience as a supplier to the military for over 20 years, I never supplied ANY warranty to them. And never did I have to stamp any date other than the week (or month) & year of manufacture.
I read the issue of competing with the surplus after the war as the rationale for Wilton to COMMENCE date stamping. Insofar as no other vise manufacturers were date stamping at that time (nor virtually
any tool makers), why would Wilton have even considered it unless they had to differentiate surplus from civilian sales?
"Theory/myth", it's all the same until factually proven otherwise. The evidence seem to be heading towards true dates on the vises, except for those marked GUAR EXP. The time line being compiled may glean some useful data to that effect.
Finally, chill out. I have not knowingly "smeared, sneared, or attacked" you. If you feel I have, I am sorry. I have much respect for your years of contributions on this forum. I just feel it is important that the dating of these historic vises supports empirical evidence.