kwoswalt99
Well-known member
The Parkwego looks like it's missing its collar.
I guess being fourtunate comes from asking questions at sales and focusing on what I am after. You also have to look where every one has either already looked and missed it or look in different places.SPEAKING OF RARE SPECIMENS>>> LOL!!!
This one has been on eBay for AGES, it was about 75 miles from me, and we finally agreed on a price that I would drive through a blizzard for...
Original paint, sharp edges, these ones don't fall out of trees...
Take care y'all!
Mike
My apologies if you have already seen them but thought that these patent drawings for the Dodge Slide Set vice might be of interest.
Thanks drives I will Work on that turnaround time.I guess being fourtunate comes from asking questions at sales and focusing on what I am after. You also have to look where every one has either already looked and missed it or look in different places.

Awesome, thanks!
VA, check this out!
THANKS MCMLVIF100!
Take Care!
Mike
The Parkwego looks like it's missing its collar.

Bagged you need to put that side by side with the similar Parker. it certainly has the Parker style jaws...
No problem. Have twice missed out on the non-swivel base version of the Dodge Slide Set -- once at an auction just up the street from our house and am still kicking myself for not bidding more, and once on local CL where I was the second caller. They are hard to find around here even though they were made within 10 miles of where I live. Someday, I hope to have one.



Picked up this Columbian 203 1/2 today at a garage sale. I got it for $35. Is there any way to determine when it was made? It's missing the pipe jaws. Does anyone have drawings of the jaws for this so I could make a set? Or is there a source to get them?
P.s. Is there a way to flip photos in here?

I'll make you a heck of a deal Kevin, LOL!![]()
I believe that is an "older" Columbian.
Previously posted by Topop101.
The most interesting point is the anvil pad was never ground. Any one have any insight as to why this is?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I want to say it's because it was assembled on Friday at about 4:15 and a cold redeye was calling to the assembler, but it's most likely just as Drive said, they weren't going to install the little square so it didn't need to be machined.
72Highboy just posted one with the square anvil.
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161217/191f8b0d6731455cac10bbdd180749e0.jpg
Those Baby Bullets fit into lunch boxes, don't they?
Maybe that one just never made it to the end of the assembly process.
JKB
No not close, the Dodge's design is very similar to this unknown vise I shown. The nut pivots up from the spring pressure when you back up and releases the finer teeth release instead of the heavy ratchet style used on the Dodge. Interested to see this ratcheting handle Athol also has the quick release. Have we seen one like this posted? The quick release on this Athol works from a cam action on the small turn handle under the meatball handle.



As far as the block attached to the baby bullets I think that it was an option for jewelers who wanted an anvil. Just a guess on my part
Top: yes i agree the screw seems to be a bit longer than it should be so not sure the dust cover (cap) will fit over it. let us know if it does. also Bcom's friend makes some sweet caps that are a few bucks cause machined, but a lot nicer than a freeze plug.
also the original Babies had what looks like a piece of steel plate set on the ANVIL AREA you are talking about so not surprised that anvil area on yours isn't touched.
DrivesI have 4 babies now. Only one has ever had the added anvil pad. 2 have the machined pad 1 , the new one is not machined. 3 don't have dust caps and the screw sticks out far beyond the end of the vise. The newest one is painted inside like it never had one. It is date stamped so I wouldn't think it was carried out in a lunch box like someone mentioned. I have caps thanks to Kevin for them , all I'm missing is the time to restore them.Maybe the added anvil pad was an option for a period. The one I have is dated 1-51 with the pad. The ones without are 52, 63 and 73.
It could be as early as the mid twenties.
I can't tell from the picture but I think I see a tail piece allowing this vise to be bolted down either fixed or swivel. Makers started doing this post WWll or at the end of it nearest I've been able to figure out.
Yes, but even the pre WW2 Columbian vises have that.