
Thanks, Smitty. Those are actually helpful. While a little fuzzy, it's clear enough to ascertain that the lock-downs on the vises in the 1948 locomotive supply company don't look like they have any neck and flange or retaining ring. It's just a long nut or perhaps a nut with a thinner neck above it. I wish I knew the date of the Parker brochure, though, because that lock-down is clearly exhibiting the captive wrench features of the first 1930 patent. The nut is at the bottom of the post, there is a thinner neck above that for getting another bite with the wrench, and a flange at the top retaining the wrench.A few years ago mark posted a page from a locomotive supply company from 1948...[ ]...I found another pic from a Parker brochure that was posted a while back here.
Go figure, I have a spring and a collar on my pre-1867 Parker?
My Parker vise has "balls of steel".
![]()
![]()
![]()
I keep staring at the photo because I can’t decide which one is in the best shape. It looks like you had a great day.Got a chance to do something pretty unusual for me today.
I went out to a fellow collector/enthusiasts home and was shown his collection.
I was also able to snag 3 new projects for myself
A Reed 204R, Reed 403 1/2”, and a Prentiss 99 coachmakers vise!
Awesome experience all around
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro




Thanks. It looks like the only vise that continued using the 1930 patent lock-down design was the 192-1/2X Small Anvil Vise. It's the only one that has a flange at the top preventing removal of the wrench. All the other lock-downs look like the nut is at the bottom of a longer post that allows the wrench to be slipped right off.I’m pretty sure the brochure is from the early 50’s.
What’s wrong with this vise?
Here are some detailed pics of my Parker 2000
This vise is only slightly operational. It seems that the spindle is shorter than it should be. As was already discussed, there is no horseshoe on the front but there is also no provision for a collar or e clip and washer on the shaft. So the dynamic jaw doesn’t open properly when unscrewing.
I see the number 720 on the base. That’s a model number right, not a manufacturing date ?
Not much wear on the slide.
.
Shift is the slide free in the bore, and if its side or top loaded, does it hang up? Maybe it needs liberal lube?

Kept lowering the price and ended up getting $600 for that wilton, so all and all it was a good flip. Paid 375 for both of them, so it was pretty much worth it. That's the only reason I collect vises is because people are willing to pay money for them right now. I also collect Stanley hand planes, railroad stuff, and oxy cutting torches for that exact same reason. People dont know what they have, sell it for cheap, and I turn around and sell it for more. If theres something wrong with making a dollar, then I guess I'm the ******* here for making money.Well asking $1k each should definitely cover travel expenses.
How bad did you lowball the seller? I cant give you 500 for both, but i can do 300 and be there today![]()

Vise:
That’s a beaut! Looks like remnants of battle ship gray are still present along with some nice USN salt air patina.
Nice find.![]()

I see the value of the CP Rotators has hit new highs.---2 years from now they will be 3 Grand.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/CHARLES-PA...608311?hash=item365df59037:g:3OsAAOSwffReUv4B
Fierljeppen, here is a unknown vise I own, 2" jaws that opens to 2-3/4 and weights 12lbs. Got it from Joe a couple years ago. Just have not seen one like it.
Pretty awesome 200-2 Parker you got there Fierljeppen, is it yours?
