Hytekrednek
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2015
- Messages
- 373
I have one and it is sweet. My favorite by a long shot. I wish they had a 1/4'' version
I picked up the Zyklops in 1/4, 3/8, and 1/2.
Let us know how you like them. I don't think you'll find them to be "typical German junk, maybe a toy for a tool polisher" as another poster described them.
Did you return them or keep them and oil them? I was also wondering if they would improve with oil so I'll be interested in the outcome.
I have to admit I'm leaning toward taking the Carlyle 3/8" & 1/4" back and getting a full Tekton set. For $63 for all three...
The Tektons are identical to the Pittsburghs. That's not a dig, they're great ratchets. Do yourself a favor and swap the handles, though. I used a set of Pittsburgh screwdrivers for donor handles, but if I was doing it now I'd use Tekton hard handles.
They don't come apart but it's easy enough to inject some oil around the edge of the anvil.
The Tektons are identical to the Pittsburghs. That's not a dig, they're great ratchets. Do yourself a favor and swap the handles, though. I used a set of Pittsburgh screwdrivers for donor handles, but if I was doing it now I'd use Tekton hard handles.
They don't come apart but it's easy enough to inject some oil around the edge of the anvil.
The Icons seem pretty well-thought-of too...
Analysis paralysis![]()
The Icons are nice. They aren't the screaming deal the Pittsburgh ratchets are but they have a higher tooth count, spin-friendly handle, slightly better fit and finish and can be disassembled for servicing. I think they're as good or better than the Carlyle ratchets for a much better price.
The Icons don't need to beat the Pittsburghs, they need to be at or very near the level of the Carlyles.
If the Pittsburgh Pros are the same as the Gearwrench, I'm going to stick with the Carlyle or Icons. Saw a disassembled GearWrench vs. Icon (non-swivel, so who knows) and the pawls were a bit on the puny side along with a couple other details. Would be nice to find a thread with some pix of the internals, but for now I'm going with the feel vs. the Carlyle pair. Thinking about getting over to HF tomorrow...
The Icons don't need to beat the Pittsburghs, they need to be at or very near the level of the Carlyles.
If the Pittsburgh Pros are the same as the Gearwrench, I'm going to stick with the Carlyle or Icons. Saw a disassembled GearWrench vs. Icon (non-swivel, so who knows) and the pawls were a bit on the puny side along with a couple other details. Would be nice to find a thread with some pix of the internals, but for now I'm going with the feel vs. the Carlyle pair. Thinking about getting over to HF tomorrow...
Badger, how did you replace the handle on the Pittsburgh and what handle did you use from a screwdriver? Got a pic you can share. I’m interested in your work. Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone using The Garage Journal mobile app
The Pittsburgh and Icon ratchets both use the Facom style mechanism. Only difference is the tooth count.
https://www.garagejournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=94832
Icon: Feel really beefy and strong - can't imagine it gives anything away to the Carlyle in terms of toughness.
Aren't the Carlyle's quick release? They appear to be on NAPA's web page. Assuming that's correct, the non-quick release Icon's square drive end is inherently stronger.
I've got all three Pittsburgh Pros (year and a half) and the 3/8" Icon (two months). I reach for the 3/8" P. Pro most of the time - the quick release I suppose. But if I could only keep one, it would be the 3/8" Icon.
Speaking of inherently stronger ...
BEGIN RANT
I recall me breaking a ratchet on just 3 occasions:
- Mid-seventies: Guts of my 42 tooth 3/8" snap-on tear drop - no cheater - barked my knuckles. Didn't like it. Snap-on guy fixed it and I went looking for a better ratchet.
- Mid-seventies: Guts of my better ratchet - an SK roto head 3/8" - no cheater - didn't bark my knuckles - finally bought breaker bars - learned to use my 1/2" flex-head and wondered why SK didn't make a 1/2" roto head.
- Late eighties: Guts of company's no name round head 3/4" drive - with an 8' cheater pipe - no enough clearance to use a breaker bar;not even with a 12 socket - had already told the company they needed a 1" - they replaced it with another no name 3/4" round head.
Moral: If you suspect it's going to break, it a good time to switch to a larger, more robust tool (if you possibly can). Just because it has a lifetime, no questions asked warranty does not constitute a reason to just continue on. If it breaks, best case scenario the tool truck pulls in the driveway at just that moment. The most likely next best case scenario is that the tool truck guy makes it to you in the next half hour or hour or so.
END RANT
...
- it seems like I wind up switching sizes more on 1/4" (I'm mainly thinking engine bay with hose clamps, etc).
...
Apologies - didn't mean to incite a rant. ... ... ... It might be purely my imagination, but the Pit and the Icon feel very different (and, as I said, the Pit feels like a much finer/higher tooth count despite being 72t vs. 100t on the others, so it's entirely possible I'm nuts).
......
I have to say it makes me wonder if the Carlyle is the best of both worlds... .
I have been using both the 1/4 and 3/8 drive pittsburgh swivel head ratchets quite a bit lately doing work on my 95 4runner. they have quickly become my favorites. well worth the small investment.
Noobie question: what is the significance of back drag?
They are still notchy. Maybe I don’t use them enough as a DIYer aka arm chair mechanic.
I went by HF today, and was really surprised by what I found - The Icon has a very different feel than the Pittsburgh, and of course the price disparity is a bit crazy between the three brands I now have in my garage (I'm not keeping them all). I'm going to mess around with them in a day or two and post pix and more thoughts if folks are interested, but the price perspective made me think.
-------Carlyle-----Icon-----Pit Pro
1/2"| $87---------$45-----$20
3/8"| $77---------$40-----$17
1/4"| $60---------$35-----$13
-----------------------------------
All--|$224--------$120----$50
Note that the Carlyle prices are ostensibly sale prices, listing at $108, $95 and $75 normally, and the Pittsburgh Pro are often on sale, qualify for coupons, etc. The Icons brand was excluded from the latest 20% off coupon I saw (which bummed me out).
![]()
Initial impressions are all over the place:
Carlyle:
![]()
Pretty darn notchy and not particularly smooth for 3/8" and 1/2" (the 1/4" feels pretty good), but the 100-tooth mechanism feels extremely beefy and high-quality. I have no doubts at all about the quality. Has quick-release buttons. Hypothetically I would be a little worried about what appears to be a receipt-necessary warranty at NAPA, but I was assured by the guys at my nearby NAPA that it was a walk-in/walk-out thing. Pricey, but not SO pricey, and I'd guess similar quality.
Icon:
![]()
Feels really beefy and strong - 90-tooth - can't imagine it gives anything away to the Carlyle in terms of toughness. Smoother than the Carlyle but also a bit on the notchy side, though the 1/4" did get smoother after some use putting together a HF tool cart, so I'd guess the others (including the Carlyles) would too. The mechanism feels really solid. Despite the fact that the Icon doesn't have quick release (which offers a simpler/stronger part for the Icon and a quicker/easier socket swap for the Carlyle),I don't think there's a practical difference to me between the Icons and the Carlyles, though I did notice the swivel bolt was beefier on the Icon (on the right).
![]()
It sounds like HF's warranty is pretty much "bring it in and we'll swap it out" - haven't heard anyone say they're asking for receipts.
Carlye vs. Icon length comparison:
![]()
Someone at HF apparently used to work in the Apple packaging department:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
While it's cool and all, provides a nice out-of-box experience and a cloth to polish the tool (?? - I'll use it for my glasses...), I have to say it's a little over-the-top. I'd take a $5 lower price to lose the box and cloth.
Pittsburgh:
![]()
(note: this is a 1/2" - story on that at the bottom)
By far the smoothest of the three (in the 1/4" - all three got a notchier at the bigger sizes). Despite being 72-tooth vs. 90 for the Icon and 100 for the Carlyle, it feels the "finest" - not sure how that happens. The mechanism doesn't feel quite as beefy (though frankly I don't have concerns about it). Has quick release. Shorter shaft and oblong handle - it would be better if the handle was round and a more traditional ratchet-handle shape. A lifetime warranty like the other two, and guessing it's also hassle-free at HF.
So.
I bought the Icon 3/8" and 1/4" and I'm keeping them. Pricey, but I like the absolute sturdiness and both will see a lot of use. Based on what I've read here and how it feels, the 3/8" will likely be the first thing I reach for when I need a ratchet.
I also bought the 1/2" and 1/4" Pittsburgh. For twenty bucks, having a 1/2" swivel seemed like a no-brainer without going big on money. I don't use 1/2" for hand-ratcheting a ton, but will be useful when I do. I got the 1/4" so I can have a second 1/4" with another socket instead of having to swap, and I like the quick release as well. I'll use the Pittsburgh when I'm deep and want to make absolutely sure the socket wouldn't come off, and the Icon otherwise (if I'm using just one).
So these are going in the new tool cart:
![]()
![]()
As nice as they are, the Carlyles went back. For $30 less than those two ratchets, I got both Icons and both Pittsburghs. That's tough to beat...
Assuming they are all the same inside you can open them up and adjust the heart shaped spring to reduce/increase friction. Also easier to lube when open.
I like my Pittsburgh Pro,have not broken it yet.
One of my go to ratchets that I use a lotRealistically, I think most of these would be really hard to break when used even close to normally...
3/8 locking flex head SO spoiled me. I ordered a 1/4 soon after. Im not a pro. I just love those ratchets. My tools save me thousands a year and snap on got some of that money this month.