Doubly rare because I can’t find another example anywhere except in a drawing from an advertisement in the April 27, 1916 issue of
Motor Cycle Illustrated. Link to full page ad
here.
Excerpt of full-page ad here…
Tracking down the tools to a 1916 Mossberg ad was fun.
But does anyone notice anything unusual about the pouch?
How about now?
This tire irons set pre-dates WWII by a few decades, Mossberg did not supply motorcycle tire irons to the Third Reich, and many of you learned tool hounds already know that the “********”, an ancient Sanskrit symbol for good fortune, was the trademark of the Buffum Tool Company, of the town of Louisiana, Missouri.
Alloy Artifacts dates Buffum to 1908. By 1917 they were running ads in trade mags boasting their self-proclaimed position as the largest toolmaker in the country. It might be true. They were making a wide variety of tools for a wide variety of industries, including bricklaying, blacksmithing, mining, and the nascent mechanic and automobilist industry. At a 1917 trade show, they exhibited over 500 tools, including machinist, engineer, plumber, tinsmith, and gardener in addition to the categories I already listed above. They also made household items, and during World War I, bayonets and airplane parts.
Even though I was well aware of Buffum and their trademark…
…I have to admit that the swastikas on the pouch was a headscratcher.
I found it improbable that Mossberg, who made tools for others in addition to their own output, would have to sub out something as simple as these nickel-plated tire irons. And it seemed equally improbable to me that Buffum would be supplying the pouch.
But I was wrong.
A snippet-only view of page 429 of the 1910 edition of the
Chilton Motorcycle, Motorboat, and Automobile Trade Directory, linked
here, cites “rolls” as one of the may products Buffum had listed in the directory.
Note that the directory says to see page 507 for the full page Buffum ad. That page is also a snippet-only view. I am waiting to hear from the Google Books team on my request to un-lock it for full view, but the directory alone is fairly strong substantiation for the pouch.
(Post 2 of 3)