wyliesdiesels
Well-known member
Prior voltage drop calculations in this thread are being calculated using only the dc resistance value (0.061 ohms/1000ft for 350MCM AL, for example) listed for the conductor in Table 9.
Vdrop = 2*100A*0.061ohms/1000ft*565ft = 6.893 volts >>>> 6.893V/240V * 100% = 2.88%.
Another site referenced in an earlier post also erroneously uses only the dc value of resistance.
This is an ac circuit and the inductive reactance in an ac circuit also creates additional voltage drop. Table 9 in NEC also provides the effective impedance(Z) for 3 conductors in various types of conduit at a common power factor of 0.85 for 60Hz operation.
(This site will quickly explain the impedance components: http://ecmweb.com/content/calculating-voltage-drop-power-distribution-systems )
Southwire is calculating the voltage drop of a conductor based upon initial voltage, load amps, Cu/AL, distance, impedance(DC resistance plus AC reactance) and permitted voltage drop (%) based upon user inputs.
In order to stay at or below required % Vd, the impedance(Z) required to meet those requirements is calculated and then the conductor with that impedance value (or next lowest) is able to be looked up and the conductor size is pushed out of the app. It is the impedance of the conductor that determines the minimum conductor size.
The conductor ampacity listed in 310.15 (B)(16) actually has nothing to do with the result.***
For 350 mcm AL…..Vdrop = 2*100A*0.073ohms/1000ft*565ft = 7.3 volts >>>> 7.3V/240V * 100% = 3.44% (This fails the 3% limit.)
For 500 mcm AL…..Vdrop = 2*100A*0.057ohms/1000ft*565ft = 5.7 volts >>>> 5.7V/240V * 100% = 2.68% (This passes the 3% limit.)
Southwire app reports back needing 500 MCM AL.
***There is a note in the Southwire app and online calculator that the 60C table is used for conductor sizes in branch circuits. Since 334.80 specifies that NMB, etc….can’t exceed the 60C ampacities, Southwire references the 60C ampacities assuming we are using NMB. NMB is available in #14 - #2 Cu. From #1 and larger, they jump to 75C ampacity references.
They have added confusion and created skepticism by forgetting that branch circuits and feeders can be run with 75C rated insulation in this range without a good explanation of referencing 60C vs 75C ampacities.
It doesn’t matter. Follow the example below:
Situation: 240 vac supply, single phase, conduit, 3% max drop desired, 25amp load, Cu, 250ft distance
From Southwire online calc:
“1 conductors per phase utilizing a #6 Copper conductor will limit the voltage drop to 2.31% or less when supplying 25.0 amps for 250 feet on a 240 volt system.
For Engineering Information Only:
55.0 Amps Rated ampacity of selected conductor
0.4662 Ohms Resistance (Ohms per 1000 feet)
0.051 Ohms Reactance (Ohms per 1000 feet)
7.199 volts maximum allowable voltage drop at 3%
5.523 actual voltage drop loss at 2.31% for the circuit
0.9 Power Factor”
A quick calc by hand:
Vdrop(#6 wire) = 2*25A*0.45ohms/1000ft*250ft = 5.63 volts >>>> 5.63V/240V * 100% = 2.34%
Since we are concerned about eliminating voltage drop, #6 Cu wire must be installed and in order to get ~3% or less Vd, it must have ocp at 30A to maintain this criteria. It doesn’t matter if nmb(55a) or thhn(65a) is used - #6 Cu is #6 Cu.
Where conductor insulation rating and ampacity would matter is in derating for number of conductors in conduit and temperature correction for elevated temps. Elevated temps would increase the dc component of the reactance and effect the Vd. Southwire app makes no adjustment for these two situations.
Thx for reminding me about reactance and skin effect and the need to change the resistance for 2/0 and larger wire....i forgot about that...
I lost one leg of my under ground service to my back garage due to a lightning strike. If I do it again I would use conduit unless the electric company was responsible for the service.
Direct bury wire is NEVER a good idea. It may be cheaper in the short term(no conduit) but it will almost always bite u in the ***.
