bczygan
Well-known member
Show me yours!
What do you make with it?
Have you ever printed the gun file?
Bill
What do you make with it?
Have you ever printed the gun file?
Bill
Well the saying was more for cars. How people would illegally download music and said you wouldn't download a car but now there has been a 3d printed car.???What do you mean?
a 3d printer is just the opposite of a cnc machine
I saw a couple of the 3d printed cars at FabTech, kinda cool but no 3d printed engine or trans.
My guess in a few years just about every household will have one, no more going to the store for throw away plastic stuff, instead you will buy the file and print it at home.
I'm the print lab supervisor at a engineering firm and 3D printing service bureau, and I assure you that the fantasy the media spews about every household having their own printer is just that.
Why would a person wait several hours and spend several dollars printing a coat hanger, when they could go to a big box store and buy a 10 pack for a dollar? Lathes and mills have been easily accessible to the general public for decades, and most people still choose to buy off-the-shelf items, or just farm out the work if they truly need something custom done. I could fire up a lathe to make myself a new bolt, but why wouldn't I just go buy one for a couple bucks? 3D printers, at this point, require a fair amount of mechanical skill to properly build, calibrate, maintain, etc... I can't tell you how many people have come in to our shop with the same story. "Well, we bought a Makerbot and now it just sits."
3D printing is most useful when used as a fast and fairly inexpensive way to prototype parts that will then be manufactured traditionally. Injection molds are not cheap and 3D printing lets you produce a prototype in hours or days instead of the months it takes to have an injection mold machined and the prototype costs a fraction of what the mold will. Also, if there are unforeseen problems that require design changes, you've only got a scrap part not a $10,000+++ scrap mold.
There are applications where 3D printing is the only way to produce a certain part, but they are limited and mostly novelty as this point. I do know Koenigsegg, or some other super car manufacturer, used 3D metal printing to print off exhaust tips since they only needed a handful for the extremely low-run car they were producing. Also, there are some surgeons printing replicas of patients organs from various medical scans so they can get a really good look at exactly what they will be working on before they actually start cutting on someone. So, there are "end-use" applications, they just aren't the norm at this point. Until the quality of the materials and printing technology increases, I suspect that will remain the case.
I'm the print lab supervisor at an engineering firm and 3D printing service bureau, and I assure you that the fantasy the media spews about every household having their own printer is just that.
I saw a couple of the 3d printed cars at FabTech, kinda cool but no 3d printed engine or trans.
My guess in a few years just about every household will have one, no more going to the store for throw away plastic stuff, instead you will buy the file and print it at home.
In 20-30 years I'd bet you'll be right. Most of the average everyday items you'll probably just print. The quality will be excellent, I bet. As for buying the file, oh no. No sir. They'll be so pirated, that they'll simply stop selling them and just have to give them away. Just like microsoft windows.
I disagree. I think people would have said the same about computers when they were the size of main frames and costs more than houses. Or they'd have said "who needs a cell phone, I have a pager."
The march of technology is pretty much unstoppable and time will decrease costs of the 3D printers...look at how much cheaper than are now than they were a decade ago. Dremel sells one for $1000 and then there are kits.
I think there are home uses for it. Kids science projects, toys, DIY types, etc. Especially given the current growth in the UAV/Drone market.
I would be shocked if 10 years from now they aren't fairly common place and are sub-$500.
All that said, the real-deal production ones will still be there and still be very expensive. The company I work for just finished printing a jet powered drone using 3D printed parts. I'm not sure that tech will ever be cheap enough for the average DIY'er, but it's sure a lot cheaper than it was a few years ago.
Here's the 3D printed jet if you wanna check it out. Pretty cool..and it does 150MPH.
http://3dprint.com/104602/jet-powered-3d-printed-uav/
In my experience, a traditionally injected plastic or rubber part is almost always superior to anything current 3D printing technology can produce. The inherent porosity of 3D printing and the layer by layer production method means that you have a potential weak point every .005" (or whatever layer height you were printing in). Printed parts, FDM in particular, behave fairly similarly to wooden parts since they both have a sort of "grain" to them. Part orientation during a print can have a huge effect on part strength.
Foundry patterns, lost-wax casting masters, thermoforming molds, and low-run printed injections molds are also excellent uses of what 3D printing can bring to product development and manufacturing.
I disagree. I think people would have said the same about computers when they were the size of main frames and costs more than houses.
How much 3d printing have you done?
What percentage of your prints turn out well on first attempt without having to add support structure, add draft to overhangs, etc.?
3d printing is really cool but it has a long way to go to be very useful beyond it's current niche. At least, on the low end.